|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Luigi Cane www.juzaphoto.com/p/LuigiCane  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Viltrox AF 85mm f/1.8 II Pros: super mechanics, exceptional sharpness, made colors a little cold but faithful and excellent saturation Cons: weight, but that's obvious. lampshed sometimes difficult to put and remove Opinion: gorgeous optics, price all in all affordable. The first model delivered to me by Amazon did not connect with my X-T4 or the X-E4. Made the return immediately and repurchased. Delivered after 24 hours, Amazon works fantastically. Taken few photos for logistical problems but those taken at the surrounding buildings show excellent yield. Saturated colors, cold, but very faithful. The only problem, but of course it's not straight, is that it's very massive and heavy. All glass and steel. super. sent on April 22, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR Pros: Lightweight, handy, crisp, excellent color yield, excellent zoom sliding and clutch Cons: Nothing, that he found Opinion: I'm sorry the few photos I could take are limited to buildings in my street. The pictured church is about 400 meters away while the group of houses is about two kilometers away. Having received it yesterday and not being able to move from home I couldn't resist taking a few shots with the X-T4 at 200 ISO and fire 8. It is true, they are photos of no value, but they give a clear idea of the quality of the goal. The realization is perfect, everything works wonderfully, the stabilization, the sliding of the zoomed, the light but very valid light light. I hope as soon as possible to take photos more in line with the quality of the goal, paid 798 Euros, new to pat. sent on March 26, 2021 |
 | Tokina SZX 400mm f/8 Reflex MF Pros: Excellent construction, solid and well cared for. Handy and, compatible with the nature of optics, with good resolution and color rendering. Well-clutched and precise focus ring. Cons: Nothing, given the nature of the goal. The view is understandably a little dark, as expected from a fire 8. Opinion: After i read Madrano's review, as it was a while since I wanted a mirror, I took it and I'm satisfied. The construction is very beautiful, solid and precise. It is very handy and the focus, with the help of focus peaking, is easy and reasonably precise. I tried it on the X-T4 and X-E4 and the yield is satisfactory for the type and price of the lens. I could not, due to Covid and Milan in red, resume street scenes, only real estate in my street. At 450 meters, 1,000 and about 2,000 you can see the details well (well). With two shots of Photoshop you draw acceptable images, certainly commensurate with the price and type of lens. On APS-C it is equivalent to a 600 on the FF. Place some untouched photos and the same with a slight swipe in Photoshop. As soon as I finish the lockdown I immediately try the road, to catch some cute shots. P.S. : I added a photo of my way to make the photos of the Tokina better understood. sent on March 16, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm X-E4 Pros: Everything: size, handling, speed, resolution. Cons: Nothing, let me think of it. The transport belt slots are a bit miserable, but it's nonsense. Opinion: This is a somely hybrid review, as it talks about the X-E4, the X-T4, and two 27mm Fujis. Pancakes. The first model and the newcomer R WR, called Mark II. Despite having an X-T4 with a large set of Fuji targetss, with a splash of Meike, Samyang and Viltrox, I couldn't resist the appeal of the X-E4 + XF 27mm bundle. 1:2.8 R WR. In fact, if the 27 Mk. II is offered (not yet available)for about 470 Euros and the bundle I bought it on Amazon for 1,100 Euros, or the X-E4 was offered for just over 600 Euros or the 27 was for less than 200 Euros. All delivered in less than 24 hours, I had the bundle last night and today I took about 100 photos with the X-T4 mounted the 27 Mark I and the X-E4 with the Mark II mounted. Well.. the optical yield is absolutely comparable, perhaps with a slight prevalence of the Mark II in focus speed and the great convenience of selecting the diaphragm on the lens itself. But as a handling, ergonomics (albeit in much smaller dimensions) speed of implementation, the X-E4 won big. Exceptional, for this little David of APS-C. I cannot show today's pictures because they are all taken in hospitals. Today, Friday 12/03/21 I posted some photos taken this morning at the market under the house with the X-E4 and the 27mm. Pancake Mark II. They are trivial photos and the lighting was bad. But they give an idea of the definition and tightness of the backlight. sent on March 11, 2021 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
