RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Andrea Chenich
www.juzaphoto.com/p/AndreaChenich



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Andrea Chenich


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

nikon_d3300Nikon D3300

Pros: Probably the SLR with the best quality / price ratio in the world used Nikon. The quality of the images it churns out is embarrassing, as are its more expensive contemporary SLRs (see 7000 series). It's damn small, light and discreet. It is the cheapest SLR compatible with AF-P lenses. The battery lasts forever. You can't get it off.

Cons: First of all the AF department, but you know and matter only if you photograph subjects in moviemnto constantly. For occasional action shots or still subjects it does its own. And then missing all the knick-knacks, levers, buttons, functions, articulated screens, U1-U2, wifi, Bluetooth, etc. of more expensive models that make it less immediate, but precisely it is an entry level made to be essential. It is still paired with the AF-S 18-55 VR II which cannot fully stand up to its 24 Mp. 95% viewfinder.

Opinion: Do you like photogrfia? Do you like to take a relaxing walk and take home a couple of nice well-made photos? Are you a penniless person who wants to learn photography? Do you want to take home some nice photos from the trips without hanging up your luggage and without the anxiety of dragging around you expensive and without the wide angle of the mobile phone? She is the answer. You stick the Nikon 35mm 1.8 DX on it and challenge you to be able to leave the house without the temptation to put it in your backpack or shoulder strap under your coat. If you want to exaggerate the vices as well with the AF-P 10-20 VR and AF-P 70-300 VR DX. Taac and the Nikon DX Dream Team is done. Or it goes well, there are also af-P 18-55 VR to match if a* wants the "normal" zoom. Obviously if a* wants to make a specific photogrfia look elsewhere (FF for portraits, DX pro for photo hunting, etc.), as well as for videos. For everything else, that is the most spontaneous and relaxed photography there is her. 24 Mp are a bang and unless one finds the winning photo to print in A0 or to spend hours retouching on the PC, it goes to god with jpeg small basic (file + light -> less slam) if one progrmma well (for those who chew English I refer to his page on Ken Rockwell's site). I read about a lot of spec masturbators complaining about poor ISO tightness, but what do you want?! Either go and spend at least 3 times as much for a full frame or a mirrorless or go directly to buy a flash. At 12800 ISO it churns out photos at the height of any social or medium/small print. The autofocus and the viewfinder are the only two notes a bit sore: 11 focus points positioned very central leave you with your neck pulled. But everything that falls into those 11 points focuses on it perettametne and without hesitation, especially when combined with AF-P lenses. Even in low light the fire catches it, and this without even the auxiliary illumiantore. You will not be able to get enough of your friends who ask you for the photos of the last evening. The viewfinder is fine, it's small, but you know, and it's 95% (oh, even Full Frame semi-pro Nikon have comuqneu the coverage of the viewfinder at 95%) which does not help for the compositions, but after a while you either get used to it or you use the Live View for shots composed to the millimeter. Even for short videos on a tripod it does not fare badly, it certainly will not have the adjustable screen or the stabilized sensor, but unlike the D3400 and D3500 it has the jack socket for the microphone. In the second-hand market it is found below 200 euros. There are renowned photographers out there who have become who they are with only a simple and essential camera combined with a normal lens, because instead of making saws on the data or wanting to show off the latest model they focused on the photogrfia and what they have in their hands is just a tool, a link between their creativity and something tangible like a file or a print. I think this damn thing is a ticket to get on that road. Then it goes well, as mentioned above, for specific things one uses dedicated professional tools, for everything else there is that small cheap SLR that churns out embarrassingly beautiful photos.

sent on March 31, 2022


nikon_100_f2-8eNikon 100mm f/2.8 Series E

Pros: f2.8, 6 cm long, 200g, 52mm filters, done as Nikon did the lenses last millennium, sharp already from f2.8, no distortions, excellent backlight resistance, damn discreet, simple and effective optical scheme, infinite hard-stop in the MAF, the II series has the diaphragm with 7 straight slats that produces beautiful stars.

Cons: light chromatic aberrations, solvable by advanced bodies or in PP

Opinion: He is literally the unlucky brother of the 105 2.5 ai-s. Slightly inferior optically it is a little lighter, more compact and in the second-hand market it is found at less. You start to understand us about photography, don't you have too many pretensions and holed pockets? This is the medium bright canvases that suits you. At concerts it does not disfigure and is only one stop darker than the 50 and 35, offering at least twice the focal length, but sacrificing autofocus. I don't even bring up the 80-200 2.8 that are big, heavy, expensive and tacky, or the 85 1.8 that people keep them tight and are not always easy to find used. Last thing that can go unnoticed, but that I appreciate a lot: on the aluminum ring, at least in the II series, there is a small stud to indicate the high while mounting it on the body, very useful for making a lens change in the dark (type in the theater or during the star sessions)

sent on July 14, 2021


nikon_50_f1-8dNikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D

Pros: Clear from fear, light, compact (you literally put it in the jeans pocket), metal frame, if you find it used in excellent condition at 60 euros (the 35 DX, you find it on average twice), the cheapest Nikon f1.8 lens there is, does not suffer from flares or ghosts, on DX you put all the filters you want me not to vignette , excellent bokeh better than 35 DX, has distance scale, accepts 52mm filters, hard stop to infinity for focus, much more reliable than 35 DX

Cons: Sometimes it is long when mounted on DX indoors, it needs a machine body with internal AF motor, in poor light while looking for the focus it can be noisy, they did not yet do them with the gasket around the attachment, it does not have internal focus so pump air in and out, does not have the bayonet attachment for a possible lampshed

Opinion: NB: I write all this as a DX owner. That is the objective. Anyone who is in second arms with the photograph should give away their entry level and take a used semi-pro machine body and this lens here. It has impressive versatility, from landscapes, portraits, street, low light photos, astrophotography. On DX it becomes a 75mm 1.8 which is very close to 85mm (I leave it to the reader to draw their own conclusions). It's smaller and lighter than the 35, more reliable because the focus is screwed and there's no risk of swm leaving you at home. A f5.6 is self-ree, but is fully exploitable at f1.8 in the dark and f2.2-f2.8 during the day. It can be long if you want photos in the interior: for a headshot it takes 1.5m, for a bust 2.5m, while for an erect whole body it takes 4.5m. Mounted on the body doesn't even seem to have it on. The front lens is quite inside the lens, so you can remove a possible UV filter without too much fear, so as not to lose that stop fraction in low light. With him you have a lot of fun and it makes you genuinely appreciate photography. Along with any 18-55 and the 35 DX is part of that pink of small lenses that you may never detach from the body. Even here the usual sulphate (:P) about the fact that it is very informative because being a fixed you have to move a little to find a good composition. With a little english knowledge just take a tour of Rockwell's blog and read his opinion to fall in love with it a priori.

sent on June 25, 2021




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me