|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gioacchino Martino www.juzaphoto.com/p/GioacchinoMartino  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Pros: AF, IS, price, weight, footprint Cons: At this price no one Opinion: Good quality tele-target for APS-C rooms. The lens is quite sharp already at full opening, it loses only a little detail going beyond 200mm, but nothing significant (especially considering the price). I use it mainly outdoors, so the fact that it's f/4-5.6 doesn't interest me, but for someone using it in low light it could be a defect that forces you to increase ISO by two stops. In any case, considering the price at which it is found you can not expect more: 8/10 vote. sent on July 16, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Price, sharpness, color yield Cons: Af Opinion: Let's start with the only flaw I've encountered: the STM engine doesn't go like other STM lenses. I also own the 55-250mm STM that goes great: much more precise and especially silent! However, leaving out the uncertainty of the AF, I can only find positive aspects: the sharpness is spectacular already at f/1.8, but it is at f/2.2 that it becomes a real blade even in the edges of the image; The chromatic rendering is fantastic and the bokeh very pleasant. It weighs very little and is very small, almost takes no space in the backpack. All in all, considering that there are definitely superior quality lenses (But they cost at least 5 times as much), my rating is 8/10. sent on July 16, 2020 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: Range of focals, fixed opening to f/2.8, image quality, IS. Cons: A little slippery focal point, it's not EF Opinion: A whole other world than the 18-55mm. The quality of the details is wonderful and the chromatic rendering is very faithful, even at the full opening and in the corners of the image. The fact that it is f/2.8 already makes it a fairly bright lens, and the stabilization allows slightly longer shooting times. Overall it's a really gorgeous optics, which I'd regret if I had to switch to FF... however, I do not understand why the dial of the focals was made so "slippery". I thought it might be a flaw in my lens, but reading other reviews I saw that almost everyone complains about it. It is not a very annoying thing, but a lens of this price should not make certain games: it extends and withdraws even with the force of gravity (What is definitely helped by the abundant weight of the lens). sent on July 16, 2020 |
 | Canon 90D Pros: Focus, burst, beautiful to hold, quality of the .jpg, orientable display and precise touch, C-RAW files almost identical to normal RAW for post-production possibilities, battery life, build quality, price. Cons: Missing double slot, 32Mpx Opinion: I come from a 1300D, used for almost 2 years. I was very undecided whether to take a reflex or a mirrorless, but in the end I preferred the feeling, ergonomics and durability that only a reflex can offer. The passage was obviously surprising, the 90D is higher in range than the 1300D and the thing is noted: - The focus works well, even in low light conditions manages to hook the subject well in an instant; - The handle conveys safety and solidity, I never had the impression that the room could slip out of my hand; - The battery seems almost inexhaustible, with a single charge I took home about 90GB of material, of which almost 30GB were video: the battery still had a notch. That said, it must also be said that from a room of this level I expected a slightly better ISO seal: Natural light I have nothing to say, I shot at 8,000 ISO (55mm, f/4 and 1/100) and the level of detail is amazing... Unfortunately in case of artificial light the result is not very satisfactory... I know that the yield is not the same between natural and artificial light, but already at 2,500 ISO the room starts to lose strokes and this I did not expect. In this sense it can be said that its very high resolution is also a weak point in case of low light, however, remaining low ISO the image quality is really spectacular and, thinking about it, there are few cases where I happen to exceed 3,200 ISO, so for me that's fine. With a double slot it would have been perfect. sent on July 04, 2020 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
