|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Franky.ski www.juzaphoto.com/p/Franky.ski  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x Pros: Good image rendering, robust build quality more than proportionate to the price, AF responsive and secure, lightweight. Cons: It is not weather sealed; the body does not have the quality of Canon lenses (white series). Opinion: Opinion: This afternoon after just two days after ordering, I got the two multipliers of Kenko (1.4x and 2x DGX PRO 300). after some test shots (5D Mk III and EF 200 f2.8 L) first impressions are positive. I state that I can not make any comparison with other multipliers, but only a comparison of the quality and the speed of AF, with and without. In principle, there is no sensation or degradation of the difficulties in the use of AF. Use in cascade (1.4 + 2) AF had some uncertainty about just "subjects" special. I am referring to white clouds and dark areas heavily (in the evening). As soon as he returns to the 1.4 or 2, you do not feel even the uncertainties in the AF. The picture quality is about the same. Obvious that losing one or two stop the effect will be different from f2.8 bouquet. Let us also that the light passes through an additional group of lenses. On balance "the game worth the candle!" For the record with the 1.4x from f2.8 to f4 switches; while with the 2x f2.8 you passin at f5.6; both (1.4x and 2x) moves from f2.8 to f8. On the 5D Mk III AF problems whatsoever, whether individually mounted is fast and has no uncertainty! sent on September 12, 2014 |
 | Kenko Pro 300 DGX 2.0x Pros: Good image rendering, robust build quality more than proportionate to the price, AF responsive and secure, lightweight. Cons: It is not weather sealed; the body does not have the quality of Canon lenses (white series). Opinion: This afternoon after just two days after ordering, I got the two multipliers of Kenko (1.4x and 2x DGX PRO 300) .rndopo a bit of test shots (5D Mk III and EF 200 f2.8 L) first impressions are positive .rnPremetto that I can not make any comparison with other multipliers, but only a comparison of the quality and the speed of AF, with and senza.rnIn principle there is no sensation or degradation of the difficulties in the use of AF. rnNell'uso cascade (1.4 + 2) AF had some uncertainty about just "subjects" special. I am referring to white clouds and dark areas heavily (in the evening) .rnAppena it returns to the 1.4 or 2, you do not feel even those uncertainties nell'AF.rnLa picture quality is about the same. Obvious that losing one or two stop the effect will be different from f2.8 bouquet. Let us also that the light passes through an additional group of lenses. On balance "the game worth the candle!" RnPer the record with the 1.4x from f2.8 to f4 switches; while with the 2x f2.8 you switch tof5.6; both (1.4x and 2x) moves from f2.8 to f8.rnSulla the 5D Mk III AF problems whatsoever, whether individually mounted is fast and has no uncertainty! sent on September 12, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 8-15mm f/4 L USM Fisheye Pros: Quality construction and L series lenses; Range of use; Weight. Cons: Can not mount a protective filter for the lens; price. Opinion: I purchased this light after a bit of inner dilemmas. I was torn between the 16-35 f2.8 L and ottca in questione.rnLa choice fell on the FishEye sostanzailmente because I wanted a perspective that had a focal length of 15 to 16mm in order to get the views as far as the eye can see. RnInoltre mounted on a APSC me becomes a 16-24mm (approx) which is not bad as optics for street light travel (APSC, fisheye and 50mm). rnL'utilizzo to 8mm is purely creative (on FF) and in different circumstances returns photos different from the usual shot! rn sent on May 29, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: It 'a lens with exceptional characteristics. At f1.2 has a rendition of "poetic" (with this is to say that donates one blurred and unparalleled contrast - in the area in focus - that does not weigh down the photo). If you diaphragm (from f3.2/5.6) there is a three-dimensional image to be delighted. Cons: The only counter that can move is the price (if taken in Italy following the Italian channels). Otherwise has no cons. Opinion: I have this lens for about seven months before writing my impression I wanted to wait a while 'to understand it. In fact, for those coming from the zoom (24-70 f2.8 and 70-200 f2.8) to switch to a fixed may be initially painful, it should read in the need to build the frame because of the focus and not the possibility to use the zoom to build it (more easily). rnEbbene, after having taken his hand, I can confirm all the positive aspects that you read about and, for negative I can refute those seguito.rnIl Bokeh lens is one that offers the of the best (along with 85 f1.2 that surpasses it for the obvious reasons why a lens with a longer focal length royal fuzzy greater at full aperture). rnPer weight and bulk I just say: you had a neck 24-70 f2 .8 L? In relation to the weight of this lens (which use for obvious reasons), and the machine body (5D MkIII) the cinquantino irrisorio.rnPer is the "softness" to the entire opening or the difficulty of focus, same as for the tempor need to familiarize yourself with the lente.rnDa last say, with an example, that Ferrari is an excellent machine, but those looking for what Ferrari did not deem it did not live up to what is required! rnCiaorn sent on January 20, 2014 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: And 'second only to the 1DX. So AF excellent, good ergonomics (very good with battery grip), dual-slot, high ISO management superb, excellent display, menus and intuitive features, durability and weather sealing, the quality of the RAW file shooting (burst and silent mode). Cons: Hmmm, price a little above the competition especially if you take it with Italian warranty. excessive cost of some accessories such as battery grip or GPS. Opinion: B heavier than a tablet) connect with the CF adapter and download them ... a little 'less easy ;-) rnComunque, which are by amateur photographer (not professional) I believe that the 5D Mk III is a great evolutionary leap. The only drawback compared to the 450D battery that lasts much, much less, probably due to the electronics present, because the lenses are stesse.rn sent on April 24, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
