|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Andr.ea www.juzaphoto.com/p/Andr.ea  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D700 Pros: Ergonomics, reliability, yield ISO, AF motor, control layout, AF speed, low density sensor that 'digests' also optical not excelled. Cons: The LV activation system is bad is antediluvian. Cloud viewfinder only to 95%. LV devours batterie.rnL'adesivo tire comes off rn Opinion: From amateur photographer I am satisfied to 99.9% made a purchase from a year fa.rnArrivo D7000 which partly disappointed me and I found in this reflex everything bisogno.rnHo I tried to print 13x18 and 15x20, in jpeg room with disabled all kinds of reducing noise control ect ... excellent result. No type of control layout visibile.rnLa noise allows to find every setting in a fraction of fast secondo.rnAF and preciso.rnPessimo the LV activation system: - turn the ring, half-press the shutter button etc ... RNLA I find it suitable for any type of situazione.rn sent on May 23, 2016 |
 | Nikon D60 Pros: Lightweight compact. CCD sensor. Good image quality and color rendering. It exposes perfectly. AF only 3 points but precise. Excellent yield lower ISO. Cons: 1 ring. ISO yield good up to no more than 400/800. Opinion: First SLR. Easy to use and understand. Digest well every optics. He exposes perfectly allows despite its 10Mpx good print resolutions. I usta for 4 years where I pulled my neck and I was always satisfied. Now I rediscovered after selling D7000 and I'm still satisfied. He was always fascinated with the yield of the CCD, for color and tonal range. His humble af missed very few times. The advice to those who have big claims and must learn. sent on July 18, 2015 |
 | Nikon D7000 Pros: Good customization commands. Light and practical. Good resistance ISO. Good dynamic range. Possibility of fine adjustment af in case of BFFF Cons: AF slow and sometimes inaccurate. It needs good optics. It tends to overexpose. Yield colors. Opinion: I landed in this reflex after years of D60 which are in love. The first impact was tragic. Accustomed to yield the CCD found myself with files from color rendering unfaithful to reality and then forced to having to work more on pp. I was surprised once the good yield ISO, up to 1600 and 3200. In addition it must be acceptable to settle. The picture quality is good, provided you do not use optical kits. The af she was often disappointed. Unfortunately it has never taken the spark, and after two years I sold. I consider it a good reflex for those who have no need for af the top, for portraiture and landscape. sent on July 18, 2015 |
 | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: Lightweight Compact Price Sharpness over f3.5 Lens hood included Cons: sharpness at RT. no VC. AF is not always fast Opinion: I chose this perspective because I was looking for a range of focal lengths that I could satisfy more than 50mm, f2.8, and it was especially economico.rnSoddisfatto? Surely! Defects? Certainly! RnNon think it can be compared to 24 70VC but for amateurs Sunday without huge claims offers value QP.rnLa its sharpness is good from f3.5 up, reaches the maximum at f9 f13, besides enters diffraction. At f2.8 is very soft and the focal length of 75 loses a bit 'of dettaglio.rnL'AF although not USM is acceptable (not recommended for use in sports, action shots or where need a fast AF) and only in rare occasions was wrong but I could give even blame the SLR. Missing the stabilizer, I do not find a big problem but in some cases would really comfortable. rnCompatto and light with a lens hood and modest (still a hood / barrel / shots / etc. is!) you bring it around without major ingombri.rnPersonalmente his strong point is the rapp QP. With just over 300E takes home a zoom discreet and many more performinggoals kit similar price. sent on January 21, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Certainly the range of focal lengths and its versatilità.rnBuona sharpness especially from F7.1 to 13.rnOttimo value for money! RnGrandezza and handling of the ring zoom.rnParaluce. Cons: Stabilizer does miracoli.rnAutofocus sometimes delicate pigro.rnBaionetta (plastic). RnScivolamento zoom when pointed down. Opinion: Bought it for my little D60 is stuck for a good 2 anni.rnLo I think a great lens from discrete economic potential and excellent value for money, much more than its direct competitor 16-85, slightly migliore.rnBuona sharpness that offers from F7.1 to 13.rnIdeale for those who do not want to spend a blow and have a good 'all-rounder' that allows (obviously with its limitations) to pass from landscapes to portraits ... rnPeccato eg the AF and VR are 'largely ineffective'. rnInutile speak of brightness, like many others is a 3.5-5.6 and therefore not bright ... rnFastidioso sliding the zoom when I walk with the camera pointing down (but maybe my model). rnLo highly recommend for those approaching the world of photography but especially to those who are already 'entangled' and has many menate for the head. sent on May 20, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Sharpness - lightweight - great value for money - precise AF - good fuzzy Cons: not received ... but perhaps the ugly hood ......... Opinion: Great lens for portraits and creative, light and sharpness already at f2.8 maneggevole.Buona chiudendo.Attaccato that improves the car feel like not remove mai.rnAdatto those looking portraits with a slight edge for the rest (for photographs and street 'landscapes' better a 35mm) rnIl price encourages much and with less than 200 euro you bring home a good lens that will give many soddisfazioni.rnConsigliatissimo! sent on February 17, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
