|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gianni Manuel Polo www.juzaphoto.com/p/GianniManuelPolo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 Pros: yield very good quality stabilization ok colors slightly dimmer than the Canon but correctable rnsolido but better carry it in a scabbard sheathed by a few euros on Amazonrnpiùmore than Sigma that tires too much in traveling hunting Cons: a bit heavy but understandable for good front lens construction to be protected with UVrnma there are no other negative feedbacks Opinion: good objective that next to the Canon 100/400 mark 2 with bodies 5D mark 3 and 80 Drnforse a better constructive choice would have been a 300/600 fire 5.6 fissorn obviously improves if used on a good tripod rnad every way recommendable choice quality ratio best price I believe it is having a good success since Vedorn sent on December 01, 2017 |
| Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 Pros: yield very good quality stabilization ok colors slightly dimmer than the Canon but correctable rnsolido but better carry it in a scabbard sheathed by a few euros on Amazonrnpiùmore than Sigma that tires too much in traveling hunting Cons: a bit heavy but understandable for good front lens construction to be protected with UVrnma there are no other negative feedbacks Opinion: good objective that next to the Canon 100/400 mark 2 with bodies 5D mark 3 and 80 Drnforse a better constructive choice would have been a 300/600 fire 5.6 fissorn obviously improves if used on a good tripod rnad every way recommendable choice quality ratio best price I believe it is having a good success since Vedorn sent on December 01, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 1.4x III Pros: no one else will have been a technical evolution from the first extender Canon Ii opinions are very divided and heterogeneous Cons: price and I think compatibility if you do not have goals canon largemouth Opinion: I own the first type I with a Canon Extender 70/200 f 4 IS always stabilized Canon and Canon 400mm f 5,6ho also multipliers Kenko Pro 1.4 and 2 300 DGXvale is worth selling the extender Canon I? and then you need to buy a new one for my lenses? or advantage is irrelevant? rnho noticed that on my 400 my Extender does not work well ..autofocus slow .. .drivetrain data ... rnmentre on 70/200 if the cavarni Kenko maintain automation and are fast nell'autofocusrnil decay of image however enough notevolernora I have a new body 5D Mark III and for this I make these questions sent on October 31, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM Pros: objective light and relatively cheap place to rnscelta plus other ottichernsembra ideal for 7 Drncomperato reservation by Fotocolombo (the price on the most interesting new) rngaranzia Italy Cons: there is limited opening rnnon stabilizer but you can not have everything Opinion: thanks for your advice, I sold my 300 f 4 and the 2x multiplier always Canonho just received the Canon 400 5.6 and made an exit before to Massaciuccoli (where there was little heat and pollution) seems to me a very objective easy to handle and with a mass rapid fire I can not say much about the quality but I hope well I wonder if it's worth checking to make retrofocus from Canon service then I think to try the Kenko multiplier which you say beneconfermo the excellent opinion on the forum JuzarnG.Manuel Polo sent on July 27, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
