|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Simlev www.juzaphoto.com/p/Simlev  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XC 50-230mm f/4.5-6.7 OIS II Pros: optical quality in relation to price - lightness compared to the focal Cons: lack of the diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm - breath of air -- dark -- autofocus Opinion: It is true that with little expense you take home a zoom tele with optical quality of respect, but you have to be aware of the compromises that you go to meet. Inside at 230mm does not focus! Aside from focusing manually, you can use the trick to focus at 50mm and then zoom in: usually (not always) it manages to get the fire right. Otherwise endless hunting, erroneous focus, impossible focus: for close-ups in the interior I would say that is not the right goal. I count on the outdoors, but also to shoot safaris and birds in flight you need good autofocus performance. In addition, it puffs air from the viewfinder (directly into the eye) when zooming out and forces you to use the bad front wheel (X-T30) if you want to adjust the diaphragm. sent on January 07, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18-55 f/2.8-4R LM OIS Pros: -Fast autofocus-nice to use-brighter than the typical zoom from kit-so much quality, proportionate to the price-solid and robust, at least appearance-all metal and glass, as far as I am given to see Cons: -Noise of slight but sensible focusing-continuous noise of the stabilizer, not eliminable-depending on the camera body, it weighs almost like the camera-you have to hold it with your left hand, if the camera body does not have a good grip-the market offers More and more economic objectives, small, light, versatile and suitable for video. This is not the case-minimal focus distance disappointing. For comparison, the Nikon AF-P DX 18-55 offers a magnification ratio of 0, 38x while this only 0, 15x. Opinion: Just touch it to realize that you have in your hands a special object, belonging a bit ' to another era in which the objectives were all like this: cold and heavy masterpieces of glass and metal. But it is mounted that is a pleasure on the modern Fuji mirrorless, also from the taste rounded. Using it is a pleasure, and I would never stop shooting. The images seem to me very sharp, the autofocus rather fast, the shots of the diaphragms emit reassuring sounds that know of solidity and precision. Having from 2/3 to a full stop of maximum opening plus is a convenience that you don't expect in a zoom kit. Unfortunately it is not great for videos, in the sense that the noises emitted are all faithfully understood by the microphones embedded in the camera: Focus, change of aperture of the diaphragm, even the zoom, also complicating the friction of the fingers. This adds up to a constant background noise, probably due to stabilization, which cannot be eliminated. Just close the ear with the machine turned on and immediately becomes apparent. Another flaw is the ease with which you can change aperture inadvertently, and the separate selector A-M for the diaphragms (due to I guess at the minimum non-constant aperture). The minimum distance of focus is disappointing, I create problems especially taking up the children who can get close attracted by the camera to be completely... Fuzzy. Finally, it is disproportionate by weight and size compared to small cameras, like the X-T30, which have practically no grip. sent on May 22, 2019 |
 | Fujifilm XC 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS PZ Pros: Optical quality-wide side focal-focus hike-close-up side Wide-amazingly small and light Cons: It is so small only at rest, to be used must first lengthen-it takes a second at the ignition to move into operating mode-so much plastic, it looks like a toy-lacks the indication of focal-noise when turned on Opinion: At rest is very small, it "opens" when you turn on the camera and retracts when you switch it off. For some this delay is unacceptable but for me it is only time to bring the car to the eye. Quick and responsive to the controls, you can adjust with the coarse ring (large focal changes) or the small one (small adjustments). Only in manual focus mode the small ring-nut controls the focus instead. Speaking of focus, it is noteworthy that in wide angle focus is a few inches away: You can not call macro but offers interesting perspectives. In my opinion the fact that the zoom is motorized is not a handicap, you just have to take your hand (or have used consumer cameras or compact cameras). They could have added the indication of the focal, at least in the viewfinder if not impressed on the barrel, instead they opted for a simple bar that merely indicates the position between the extremes W and T. By making videos I discovered an important flaw: it emits a continuous noise when the camera is turned on, inevitably recorded by the microphones on the camera body. I have not found a way to delete it, the noise is also turning off stabilization and autofocus, even in playback mode. Obviously to this we add the noises of zoom and focus, both motorized. I wonder if I received an unlucky specimen or so "by design". Are they so all Fujinon? Compared to the XF 18-55 is less bright, ugly, clumsy to use; The autofocus is slower, the stabilization less effective, the noises more pronounced. But I still find it preferable in general: it has a more useful focal range (for family, groups of people, sefie, landscapes), is lighter (about half), compact (it shortens when not in use), scales well on the X-T10/X-T20/X-T30, is easy to use even with A single hand (to turn the ring nuts just the tip of the middle finger of the hand that wields the camera), focuses from very close (wide side) and the optical quality is still good. More portable, versatile and economical. sent on April 02, 2019 |
 | Fujifilm X-T30 Pros: -Retro Look-manual controls-quality of the available products and optics-compactness of the body machina especially coupled with lighter lenses-good reactivity to be mirrorless-convenient charging via USB Port C Cons: -Not really popular launch price: There are equally capable DSLRS that cost half-key Q too easy to inadvertently press-App so slow in initialization that I have passed the urge to use it-no external charger: it recharges however Via USB Port C-Low power (1A) of the supplied USB power supply-Reduced Eyepoint Opinion: First experience with a Fuji, choice for the presence of manual controls that the other homes are struggling to propose if not on high-end products, big and expensive. Along with the zoom 15-45 is so small that it looks like a toy, but the photos are of an impressive quality. The electronic viewfinder should be set in boost mode as recommended by all online, then the fun is assured. Solid body and "dense", unfortunately the ergonomics is penalized by small dimensions: difficult to grip firmly without inadvertently pressing a few buttons. Eyepoint 17.5 mm annoyingly short: Having relatively long lashes I often find myself preferring the LCD to the viewfinder. Immediate use also on the part of has never taken in hand a Fuji before, offers good customization options: Color adjustment, noise, focus, dynamic range... I am not a video expert but the results seem to me to be rich in details, both in FullHD and 4K. App of a terrible slowness to take control of the machine, I will not use it unless forced. Transfer photos to your phone, but for me it is more practical to extract the SD memory card and insert it into a player, exactly as it was 10 years ago or more. sent on April 02, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
