RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

MischNat
www.juzaphoto.com/p/MischNat



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by MischNat


zeiss_batis135_f2-8Zeiss Batis 135mm f/2.8

Pros: it is something different

Cons: maybe a little heavy for f2,8

Opinion: I use this lens with Sony mount on my Nikons z (7 and Ff) , adapter Megadap and it works with full satisfaction. It was the choice between the 70-180 , the 70-200 and this one, I own a Zeiss 135 manual f2 and it was the best glass I ever used, now i appreciate AF and finally I decided to give this Batis chance with an adapter. Bought used for half price and I can only say it surpasses my expectations . The Megadap opens Nikon Z for Zeiss AF and the results are impressive, I now look to find the 18 mm used, also from Zeiss. Concerning the results it is difficult to articulate what is the difference between this glass and let's say Nikon . the 80-200 was simply too heavy and Nikon S lenses are perfect , sharp clean etc, but this Zeiss brings in something more something like how I wanted the picture to look when I took it. Maybe this is not objective or in no way a scientific review, but I use Hasselblad XD, Nikon and Olympus systems and this Zeiss lens on Nikon Zf has quickly become one of my favorites, I would compare the results ( if I may say the way a photo speaks to me) with the Hasselblad xd 80mm witch is outstanding and as expensive. my advice to Nikon users: try it

sent on January 11, 2025


olympus_omd_em1_iiiOlympus OM-D E-M1 III

Pros: all you need and more

Cons: limits of the small sensor in 1% of the fotos

Opinion: I use Nikon ff, Olympus and Hasselblad cameras. The Hasselblad files are miles better then the other, and ideal if you do fotos of 1m x 1m and more, I recently did a Fotobook with pictures of my grand son , I just choose the best from last year and reviewing the book (A3) , I can not tell which one is made with what camera. At this size there is no difference. when I show the book to other people, they practically all find 2 fotos better then others, one done with Nikon ff and a Jupiter 44-1 58mm found on eBay for a few € and the other with a Hasselblad XD 80mm. For the rest, the Olympus does a fantastic job. The first difference in landscape photography is what you are ready to carry around, you can take the Olympus with a 12-40mm, put the extraordinary 8mm in your pocket left and the wonderful 75 mm in the other and you go practically for every situation without needing to find a specialist for reeducation of your back after the trip. Of course, their are limits, described in other posts here , limits in comparing the output by sensor size, but 1. you can compensate a lot of these with software and 2. do you really need that for 99% of your images? It makes me think of a lecture I once heard in business school: "when is enough enough?" . I practically do not use anymore the Nikon Z, which is certainly a very nice camera, I take the Hasselblad for critical landscape work and for the rest I enjoy my Olympus, newly with the outstanding 15-400mm.

sent on December 21, 2021


olympus_150-400tc_proOlympus M.Zuiko 150-400mm f/4.5 TC1.25x IS Pro

Pros: light, sharp, quick, a game changer

Cons: price

Opinion: a fantastic lens ! the combination with the new cameras makes a completely new experience possible, most of the tome you can do pictures handheld, and for the rest you do not need a heavy tripod. what astonishes me most is that I get pictures with the system that are better then before with full frame and lenses whiting 3x times more and costing 2x more- I changed to Olympus because the best camera - lens si the system you have with you, or you can carry, and for a very practical experience when Nikon charge me over 700€ for a service on a 200-400 F4 lens I used all in all just 3 times and in good conditions- I do not regret.

sent on September 27, 2021


hasselblad_xcd120_f3-5macroHasselblad XCD 120mm f/3.5 Macro

Pros: outstanding portrait lens, impressive sharpness

Cons: slow to focus

Opinion: this is an outstanding portrait lens, fotos give that "wow" effect, the sharpness is wonderful, in macro work it is difficult when I compare with the ease I can take macro pictures with Olympus or Nikon equipment, and it is not 1:1, but I found that I can increase magnification with a 77mm macro app lens. I did not yet use it in this combination, but test images were more then satisfactory. I like this lens as a versatile small tele to walk around in the nature and to do portraits.

sent on December 04, 2020




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me