RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Antonellomora
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Antonellomora



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Antonellomora


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

nikon_z24-120_f4Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Pros: Focal range, quality returned to all focal lengths/apertures, build quality, customizable ring.

Cons: Vignetting present at full opening.

Opinion: An excellent all-rounder, honestly I would never have thought to see such image quality returned by a 5x zoom: great sharpness in the center and in the midframe, it drops a little at the edges but still remaining in the field of excellence. And this at all focal lengths and all apertures! I made a direct comparison with the 50 f/1.8 S photographing the same scene with both lenses (the 24-120 clearly set to 50) at f/4: I didn't use laboratory techniques, but at sight the results are perfectly superimposable, only at the edges you can perceive the best quality of the fixed. I was very amazed by this zoom performance. I have not yet detected chromatic aberrations, instead I have noticed a rather evident presence of vignetting at f/4, more or less at all focal lengths; easily solvable in post anyway. Coupled with a fixed light (I chose the 50 f/1.8 S) it constitutes a compact, effective and very high quality kit; of course it has its cost, but for me (especially if you find it used) the money you spend is worth it all. Highly recommended!

sent on December 03, 2024


nikon_z50_f1-8sNikon Z 50mm f/1.8 S

Pros: Sharpness up to the edges of the frame, no aberrations, good blur.

Cons: Weight and bulk for a 50, concave front lens.

Opinion: A great lens, a 50 mm that returns stunning sharpness from edge to edge, at all openings; only at f/1.8 the extreme angles are a little weaker (but just a little) but already at f/2.8 and even more so at f/4 it is almost disarming for how sharp it is, from edge to edge. Chromatic aberrations not received, not even vignetting, excellent resistance to backlight; Those who are more experienced than me could object to a bokeh that is not exactly textbook, but for my needs it is still very pleasant and is more than fine in this respect too. Excellent build quality, fast and silent focusing, nothing to complain about. I put the concave front lens among the cons as I notice that it makes it a little more difficult for me to clean than a convex lens, but I'm really looking for the nitty-gritty. I accompany it with the 24-120 f/4 S and for my needs I have a very effective, compact and very functional kit. Absolutely recommended.

sent on December 03, 2024


nikon_z5Nikon Z5

Pros: Image quality, size, dynamic range, very effective stabilization, design (but this is subjective), dual SD slots, value for money, battery.

Cons: Non-BSI sensor, sometimes shaky and uncertain autofocus with low light, very slow burst, video compartment (which I don't use anyway), lack of superior display.

Opinion: It's my first FF camera, I've been using it for a few months and I must say that I'm very satisfied with the purchase: the sensor does its job very well with an excellent dynamic range and resistance to high ISO even without being back-illuminated, up to iso 6400 the files are completely usable and workable, losing a little more detail only in the shadows. The construction is solid and with good ergonomics, heavy enough, big enough. The only aspects that I would describe as real defects are: 1) the tendency of the autofocus to be slow, wobbly and sometimes uncertain when the light is low 2) a burst that is certainly not lightning fast. The video sector seems not to be up to the times, but it doesn't matter to me as I don't use it. The stabilizer works really very well, used with Nikkor Z lenses it works at its best and allows you to really gain 4 or 5 stops. In short, in my opinion it is a perfect camera for those who want to enter the FF world, suitable for the advanced amateur photographer let's say, which allows you to take excellent photos in almost all areas excluding perhaps only action and sports photos; I paired it with the 24-120 f/4 S and the 50 f/1.8 S, both of which are great lenses for me and cover everything I need at the moment. Definitely recommended, although not for professionals.

sent on December 03, 2024


fujifilm_xf10Fujifilm XF10

Pros: APS-C sensor, excellent image quality, raw files, bright optics, compact and lightweight, ok up to ISO 3200, beautiful to see and touch

Cons: AF, unsealted, 35 mm and 50 mm virtual usable only in jpg and not in raw, 4k movies in fact not achievable

Opinion: I was looking for a camera that could combine compactness and image quality and I must say that in this Fuji I found what I was looking for; purchased new for about 300 euros I have been using it for about 1 year and I must say that the impressions are very positive, it responds perfectly to my needs as an amateur photographer. As already mentioned and restated the AF is not at all a lightning of war, so I do not recommend this camera for a "dynamic" type of use (sports, action scenes, etc ...), however setting it on a single point and using the touch display to point with your finger where you want the focus does not work badly; I also find the MF very well usable thanks to the help that comes from focus peaking. The images it churns out are really good in all situations, you have the opportunity to shoot in raw (absolutely recommended choice), and if you equip yourself with a tripod you can also take great photos when the brightness is low or even at night (the constellations recover well, I still have to try the Milky Way). Too bad that the 35 and 50 mm virtual lenses are usable only if taken in jpg and not in raw, also do not consider this camera if you are going to make videos in 4K. The aspect that I definitely regret the most is the fact that it is not stabilized, though.... everything must also be compared to the price you pay; for 300 euros I have an APS-C sensor combined with a high quality optics, all in a solid and well-built body that fits in a pocket, with manual controls that allow you to use it in almost every field of photography (amateur), so perhaps even asking for a stabilization would have been even too much for this price. Rating 10.

sent on November 18, 2021




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me