|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bernardoenri www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bernardoenri  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Lightness, autofocus, versatility, sharpness (for lens type) Cons: Plastic, 18 mm vignette (automatically corrected) Opinion: I bought this lens almost a year ago and but I use with satisfaction in coupled to my a6400, as I mentioned in the pros has an enviable sharpness to be a superzoom, the autofocus is fast and quiet. Purchased as a kit is definitely to have, buy it individually for 600 euros even not. The construction is a bit too plastic, it should not be tropicalized but I used it in Norway in the pouring rain for several days and did not give me any problems. The 18 mm vignette in the elaborate raw nn shot is exaggerated it seems like a design error, but still with a click it solves everything sent on September 22, 2020 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Focal excursion, stabilizer, lightness, flare resistance, price Cons: Too plastic, never really sharp, distortion Opinion: I had this lens for a year and I got to test it on various trips, it was my first real wide angle and its focus gave me the opportunity to experiment with new camera angles. It has an excellent stabilization, at 10 mm I managed to shoot even at 1/2 of a second in some cases, it is very light, it resists well to the flare (with lampshade mounted) and has a great value for money. It's a plastic, but at 250 degrees what can you expect? The thing that made me turn my nose up is that to start it will also be fine, but when you start to develop a RAW file and maybe you are going to make a 100% magnification you notice all the optical defects of this lens: distortion (even if just one click to corr "It's a very bad thing to do," he said. sent on October 24, 2019 |
 | Tamron AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC Pros: Versatility, price Cons: Sharpness, AF, inbright, stabilizer Opinion: The classic bottle bottom. This lens is just the perfect example to understand that if you buy a reflex/mirrorless (interchangeable goal) you have to put in to account to spend money on goals, otherwise better buy a compact. Some time ago I decided to buy this optics to match my eos 1300 d, never chosen was more wrong. I'm just telling you that the 18-55 kit is much sharper, more responsive. This lens has as pro only the focal excursion, otherwise it is really bad in everything. Bad sharpness to all focal points and all diaphragms (at TA the RAW file is truly unwatchable), built very badly (all plastic, including bayonet), and also suffers from chromatic aberration. Distortion quite accentuated, but with this focal excursion you put it into account. If you want a lens to start with which to experiment all the focal points less than 200 ok, otherwise leave it alone. sent on September 20, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
