|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Vigna88 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Vigna88  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Distagon T* 21mm f/2.8 Pros: THE Wide Point Cons: nobody considering the ridiculous price of the used otherwise 1600euro for the new was decidedly a con with the capital C Opinion: Since I abhor at the mere thought of mounting a wide under 20mm, this focal is perfect in full never too long nor too short I do not see a single reason not to take this distagon, it is simply perfect in all and now, for general madness and joy pers you can recover in human numbers. virtually absent distortions vignette does not know what it is (I begin to assume that it can cover even a good part of a digital mediform) micro and macro contrast exceptional that make everything much more vivid almost three-dimensional. sent on February 04, 2020 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: A little of everything Cons: Lens not resolved Opinion: I must admit I was a little disappointed to be this magnificent obbiettivo.rnHa really all you need for a modern optical stabilization speed af Crazy excellent sharpness at all focal lengths and performs well in CT ... rnQuello that made me give only 8 of 10 in this lens and the lack of risolvenza and peredita of detail even at very bland crop 20% circa.rnCerto by zooming a bit ce expects it but thought after the thousands of positive criticism that reggese a bit of piu.rnOvviamente for what it costs either new or used worth every penny and more. sent on November 07, 2013 |
 | Mir-1b 37mm f/2.8 Pros: Fixed lens from very low cost, excellent build quality all-metal, preset aperture (double ring selection aperture) incisive resolute on aps c can do a bit of everything (60mm equivalent) rn Cons: You can not put lens hood, manual adjustment maf (although for me it is not a counter) Opinion: Honest opinion on this perspective: the rnQuando I got I was not expecting great things having paid 35 euro including expenses spedizione.rnpoi just tested on the field I put it right in a critical condition. (Fog little rain backlight brightness) RNE son was immediately impressed, reacts very well in any condizione.rnOttica very bright and sharp incisive no distortion or chromatic aberration. RnSe I have to find him a new vignette slightly on APSC then mounted on ff could be annoying. sent on August 02, 2013 |
 | Jupiter 21M - 200mm f/4 Pros: 200mm fixed cost good optical performance and very solid Cons: To infinity loses punch against the disastrous for some could be heavy and of course full manual. Opinion: Optics in my opinion ecceuzionale 50 euro better spent on a vetro.rnAd a first approach with manual lenses may seem cumbersome, but it is mastered in a short time with a lot of pissed soddisfazione.rnLo 20d and the complex actually pesantino but nothing impossible .. . RNA is relatively soft wide open but closed one stop is incredibly detailed and nitidio over short distances, pointing toward the horizon to infinity misfires and backlight completely sbarella but overall it does its job very well. sent on May 23, 2013 |
 | Sigma 24-135mm f/2.8-4.5 AF Pros: cost sharpness brightness blur zoom range. Cons: af noisy inaccurate loss of quality on the sides. Opinion: Optics from the older generation sometimes amazing results with the right light and good stabilization file returns very sharp and a very realistico.rnE incarnate 'an excellent all-rounder because of the focal length and maximum aperture to 2.8 but the best of it by I find instead on portraits rarely suitable for all sigma paesaggistica.rnPurtroppo as both old and new borders hold less than similar lenses of parents, but to get started is a zoom of light from the low-cost and performance all in all satisfactory. sent on March 06, 2013 |
 | Sigma 500mm f/4.5 AF APO (1988 version) Pros: focal length sharpness very low price being a very old lens. Cons: Af slow and noisy, on the 10d canon digital only works on the maximum aperture gives error99 otherwise (canon eos d30 and d60 works without restrictions) Opinion: despite being a very old lens has a sharpness still good, unfortunately on canon unfortunately can only be used to F4.5 but I must say that returns a file good enough you could close would not trade it for anything in the mondo.rnIl weight is not excessive photo sessions 2 to 3 hours maximum freehand strongly recommended tripod. sent on March 05, 2013 |
 | Sigma AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro Pros: great price of used, versatile and lightweight, non-critical condition returns a good quality Cons: Slow and noisy autofocus in low light conditions poor performance to 300mm lacks sharpness. Opinion: Goal must-buy used (maximum of 80 euro) for beginners and want to get closer to longer focal lengths without svenarsi.rnOttimo to determine whether or not to approach in the future to super telephoto lens very costosi.rnCerto not suitable for purists sharpness much less to those who must live in photography but very light and versatile suitable for any scampagnata.rnrn sent on March 04, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
