|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Sebbysebb www.juzaphoto.com/p/Sebbysebb  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 35-150mm f/2.8-4 Di VC OSD Pros: Very wide range - unthinkable sharpness for a non-pro band zoom - minimum distance maf 45 cm - f3.3 up to 90 mm - 10-year polyphoto warranty Cons: indecent lampshade - af a little noisy Opinion: After several attempts to research reviews and rather rare tests on the web, and the absence of reviews and opinions here in the santograal of juza photographers (also due to its recent release, summer 2019) I ventured to compar it. It's a good responsibility to review an optics first, especially for a newit like me, so take it with pliers. CHe say. I've never been happier! Tired of carrying 24-70 and 70-200 (both tamrons of which the first G2 according to G1) I was looking for a zoom that would replace both to have an opticthat that covered 90% of the range of focals i shoot for my habit. The sharpness I find formidable,with great detail, and surprisingly on all the focal points. Where the 24-70 G2 (and not only) decays significantly beyond 50mm (also found in the measurements of some sites such as opticallimits) this remains clear even at the edges at TA, almost up to the long focal points. I like bokeh,maybe even more than 24-70.I have not noticed distortions and important chromatic aberrations.with the profile correction does not vary anything so it is quite regular. The colors are well contrasted, I find them very much in line with the G1 tamrons. The af is good, as well as precision to the two tamron pro ,if anything a little noisy definitely more than the 24-70 G2 which is inadvertent. The stabilization is good, at 1/25 to 150mm brought home 80% of the shots. Another great advantage is the minimum focus distance, only 45cm. a third of any 70-200 that I know, considerable if you want to make close portraits or seize details. I already had the tap-in that allowed me to check the f/b focus and the correction on my specimen was minimal . Of negative I point out the absence of the telemeter (but this is not an optics of the pro line) and the plastic lampshade and with old hook.on the g2 had taken a nice step forward. In conclusion, I can say that I am satisfied with the purchase.820 euros purchased from RCE di Padua that I thank for the treatment also seen the trade-in , for an optic practically guaranteed for life (10 years polyphoto . assuming the reflex world takes so long) is really honest and fulfilling. Probably in an evening event will never replace my 70-200 2.8 that I did not deplete on purpose for diaphragm and extension, but it will make you happy when you go out only with this. I would say that combined with a wide angle 18-35 or the 17-35 osd of the same family, you have completed the all-around kit. sent on October 02, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4 G Pros: Lightness, clutter, blurry and natural Cons: Questionable sharpness, slow, frequent presence of b/f focus Opinion: It is a lens that does not excel at anything, but with positive characteristics maybe a little forgotten. You love her or you hate her. You love it for its not overly contrasted colors, to be absolutely light and compact. too perfect. The af is not at the forefront and you can see it. It should be closed from f2 onwards to have a sufficient sharpness and especially a decent pdc in focus, the bokeh is good but sincerely I prefer that of my tamron twins . Found a virtually illiterate specimen, suffered from front focus.I had to calibrate it in the car at a value of 6 on my D750. Never tried the little brother 1.8G and I can not make the comparison sent on July 09, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF 70-210mm f/4 Pros: Lightness, Practita. Great Af for a vintagr Cons: Almost no one for the price used as vintage (maybe more sharpness) Opinion: Lens from the Practita everyone other than other times: read it for a zoom up to 200 F4 constant, blurred more than good, does not lengthen zooming, and contrariamenre to what many say L AF and rather fast to be ' prehistoric ' (I have new ones no quicker). The The AF ring is very smooth and that of the focal soft. It should be used with the lens hood HN-24 (in the case of FF that I own) to avoid excessive flares and foaks. The colors are not as hot as the regret 35-70 2.8 D which I had but good. The resolve is more than good. In summary, for those who need a 70-200 or similar is an excellent starting point without spending several hundred euros and at the same time avoid variable-aperture zoomons that Jon are worth. Around the 150 euros you will grab a nice toy that will give you satisfaction and excellent practice sent on March 09, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 Pros: Compact and lightweight for a 2.8, decent AF, Prena ' Evergreen ' opportunity in good condition at a competitive price Cons: Risk matting around the corner (fortunately not mine) Opinion: Specific always to be a neocyte then to be taken with the pliers from my point of view (but I also think that the amateur advanced so much or you have certainly already had or points to something vintage of a different budget). I have only a few days this magnificent specimen taken at a very competitive price but especially immaculate. and compact, lightweight, well other than my Sigma art 18-35 that on d7100 and definitely another world like resolution and sharpness (accomplice F 1.8 and its excellent sharpness already at 2.2/2.5). But as colors do not disfigure at all indeed, the 35-70 and slightly warmer, though softer. And anyway usable already TA for close-ups very targeted and to have a good sharp composition you have to climb to other values. Even the pump mechanism (which I had never tried) does not cause difficulties indeed.. And very challenging! I still have not been able to observe the suffering of the flares (although those ' imperfections ' know so much of vintage flavour, perfection sometimes makes a composition cold). Attention to the hood: that you use it on DX or FF there are differences in terms of vignetting. I read that its standard and almost useless and I ordered HB-15 which seems to be the most suitable for DX. It ended with the AF of course noisy as managed by the body but it is discreetly fast and quite precise (certainly nn is so much better than the 18-35 test done also other specimens). Final advice? If you find an excellent specimen free from opacizzaxione take it but nn over 200-220 euros, if you think of doing the deal and then to do it revise, leave it alone. sent on December 09, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-P DX 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G VR Pros: Warm colors, great AF, outrageous price Cons: Excessive featherweight (if you really want to find one at this price) Opinion: Being a newcomer, I will make a description not too detailed as I could not afford it. Give it to my wife (through subliminal messages inflicted), and the best quality lens I have (right now). I like colors, hotter than the Sigma 17-70 C that I own. The data is dark, but a tele is used for outdoor use, events, sports, and as far as I'm concerned it satisfies me. I find it already sharp enough to 7.1 and its maximum and a F10 to average focale.ma anyway at f8 I find it very good at all focal. The AF is never wrong, accurate and very fast, the effective VR, as far as I am concerned I noticed 2-3 stop advantage. and a lens ' zero wastes, has no selectors, the MAF however it handles well and the ring and soft the right. There is not even that VR that should be deselected in the menu (on my d5500 all compatible but eye to older models) of course is a plastic barrel , and excessively light, more weight at these focal gave more stabilita...ma what you want con140 import? My purely performance rating and 8.5, but taking into account that it costs nothing, 10! If you are a novice like me, it will be a great playmate. P.S. the lens hood is not included sent on November 11, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
