Reviews written by Guido Muratore

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Guido Muratore
www.juzaphoto.com/p/GuidoMuratore

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Guido Muratore

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Wimberley Sidemount WH-200-S

Pros: Lightness, robustness, maneuverability

Cons: Nobody

Opinion: The head I use for years. We attack the 100-400, the 300 2.8 and the 500, never bent, thanks to the important section. The fact that it does not have L bracket makes it lighter and less cumbersome for travel or long walks. Now I have also ordered the extension to make it a full gimbal, so that it has a double choice in case of more goals Heavy. The finishes and knobs indicate a precision in the construction that I hardly saw on other heads. What about ... perfect :)

sent on May 21, 2017

Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD

Pros: Excellent sharpness and detachment plans

Cons: Made against the

Opinion: Great lens, especially if placed in relation to what it costs. The thing that impressed me the most is the good three-dimensionality of the picture, which I did not expect it sincerely. Even the sharpness is very good, impressive even when closed to f4 or f5.6. A bit 'disappointing performance against the light, but a lens that costs less than € 300 you can not expect miracles!

sent on August 18, 2012

Canon 50D

Pros: Gust, accurate AF with the central point

Cons: Poor performance at high ISO (say, over the 800-1000), AF points lateral ineffective for fast-moving subjects

Opinion: It 'was the camera that has replaced the 40D (which I've never had a particular feeling) and I have to say that the progress has been remarkable. A much better performance at high ISO (though not always to lofty levels). Precise autofocus with the center point (I have used with the 400mm f5.6L and misses very few photos this pairing). Unfortunately, using the AF points side is utopia for birds, if you do not have a solid background not hardly ever catches fire. If you want a good car, you do not want to spend so much and not interested in the video there is no better machine than the 50D

sent on January 08, 2012

Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM

Pros: AF, lightness, sharpness

Cons: Unique: lack of stabilizer

Opinion: Bringing you unique, lightweight and crystal clear, perfect for the mountain where a 300 2.8 hours led to destroy you. With its light weight hand is not felt, the quality is spectacular and also allows good crop without excessive loss of detail. The only drawback for static subjects is the lack of the stabilizer, with a lens that would be even more perfect!

sent on September 29, 2011