|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Aletexano www.juzaphoto.com/p/Aletexano  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art Pros: Versatility, build quality, autofocus speed, stabilizer, sharpness, blurred, contrast, colors, flare resistance, no distortion. Cons: 24mm vignette. Opinion: It's a real "everything do" and it does everything right. Five basic focal points in a single lens (24mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm and 105mm) allow you to do virtually any photograph. Ideal to take on the go, it allows you to face any photo release without any particular regrets. The sharpness is remarkable for a zoom. It has a very good contrast. Never had a chromatic aberration problem. The autofocus engine is fast and precise (my model showed no front/back focus problems, a problem that unfortunately afflicts many Sigma). No distortion on the entire focal excursion. Constant F4 opening. Against all odds, it has a very nice F4 blur that is able to return excellent portraits. Only neo: vignette a lot at 24mm, but the problem is easily solved in post production. Strange. sent on August 27, 2020 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness, contrast, f1.4 opening, flare resistance, colors, bokeh. Cons: Unreliability of focus Opinion: It's one of my favorite goals. The 35mm are very versatile, allowing various types of photographs, from street photography, to the portrait set, to the portrait in the foreground. The sharpness of this lens is unreachable, even at maximum openness. Closing a stop and, therefore, at F2 achieves an exceptional sharpness, maintaining a pleasant blur. The blurred is beautiful, but "nervous": this creates problems when in the background there is the sky and a figure, polygonal because of the strong contrast that determines an artificial effect (type "cartonate"). He does not suffer from chromatic aberrations. Focus is a disaster. I spent hours with the dock station (fundamental) and after two calibrations it improved a lot. However, at maximum opening, it often errs on the focus (by taking three photos in identical sequence, you will find three different focus points). With a lack of light, the focus becomes virtually impossible. These are important problems, but the quality of the photographs it produces largely justify the purchase. Recommended. sent on August 27, 2020 |
 | Zenit Helios MC 44M-7 58mm f/2.0 Pros: Compactness, sharpness, bokeh swirly, flare resistance, price, vintage Cons: Nobody Opinion: One of the most beautiful surprises among the vintage goals tried. Unreachable value for money. Sharp even at maximum opening. Manual fire easily manageable thanks to the wide and generous dial in the calibration. Incredible flare resistance. It features beautiful portraits featuring its famous bokeh swirly. Impossible not to have in the kit. sent on August 25, 2020 |
 | Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/1.4 (C/Y) Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, optical and constructive quality, flare resistance, colors. Cons: Nobody Opinion: It's a great target. At first it is very difficult to use. The exclusively manual fire and the aperture of the F 1.4 diaphragm are difficult to reconcile. I confess to having hated it at the beginning: frustrated by so many shots out of focus. Then, I figured out how to use it: light overexposure and slight compensation of the frontfocus. And it was love. Sharpness over every limit, an incredible bokeh effect, vivid colors. In general, it can give the photographs a magical effect. It literally leaves open-mouthed. It became irreplaceable in my kit. A MUST have! sent on August 11, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
