|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alessandro Sussi www.juzaphoto.com/p/AlessandroSussi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S DX 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Weight, effective VR Cons: Embarrassing autofocus, purple fringing, chromatic aberrations Opinion: Resold and replaced with the Tamron 70-300, which for a few euros more offers much more. It's little more than a lens to take souvenir photos, the sharpness is not who knows that, the autofocus is embarrassingly slow... Frustrating at times. In cases of high contrast, especially at open focals and above 200mm it suffers from chromatic aberrations and purple fringing. Well, the VR, you shoot freehand even at 300mm. It is obvious that at this price you can not expect the quality of a 70-200 2.8, but at similar prices it is located around much better. sent on December 20, 2019 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Pros: Constructive robustness, sharpness, chromatic rendering, rapid autofocus Cons: Exaggerated flares, chromatic aberrations in special conditions, noisy self-focus Opinion: I took this lens found at a heist price on ebay. I use it in conjunction with the D7500 and D3300 (with manual focus, since the autofocus engine is not in the lens, which relies on that of the machine body). Despite the now venerable age, it still churns out some very beautiful rows, personally I love the chromatic rendering, especially when combined with a good polarizing filter. Self-focusing on these focal points may not be often needed, but it is very quick (albeit noisy). You get files with good sharpness, they don't fear the 24 mpx at all, not bad for a lens built when the machines it's aimed at had an average of 12 mpx. The construction is excellent, used in difficult conditions has never betrayed me. I like less, however, the suffering to do really exaggerated, it is normal that on focals so the flare is a problem, but on Tokina is really exaggerated, and in addition they turn out huge. Sometimes he suffers from chromatic aberrations. Overall it's still a very good goal, grade 8. sent on December 19, 2019 |
 | Nikon D7500 Pros: Robustness, burst, size, ISO seal, tropicalized, autofocus that covers virtually the entire sensor. Raw files are very workable, recovering shadows and lights impressive lysc for an aps-c. Cons: The shutter button is definitely too sensitive, but you get used to it after a while. The sensor tends to get dirty easily (although automatic cleaning works well). Opinion: I took this machine to replace my faithful D3300. Well, it's like going from a utility vehicle to a sports sedan. It has many common features with higher-ranking full frame machines, the functions are really many and the related keys are arranged in a very comfortable way. The gust is impressive for a car of this headband, ideal for sports or wildlife photos. The raw files that the machine churns out, then, are really good, very workable and accurate. The ISO seal is excellent for an aps-c, you shoot without problems up to 2500 iso, you get very workable files at 3200, and in case of need you can get to 4000 or 5000 still getting a passable result. The body is then a tank, I took it in the damp, the heat, the dust, the "jungle", the cold, many hikes in the mountains, on iron roads, traveling to Iceland at very low temperatures for several days, and has always worked very well, and the battery he never made jokes. Personally I did not miss a few megapixels, in the end it does not often happen to print gigantographies and the 20.1 that the D7500 offers are also good for wall prints. sent on December 05, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
