|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Luca Berton www.juzaphoto.com/p/LucaBerton  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R Pros: Quality/price, lightness, focal length, contained dimensions. Cons: Plastic Bayonet, chromatic aberration Opinion: Rated 8: Excellent price quality considering that with 100/120 € you can take one used. 80/300 focal length Exploabilissima. F 4-5.6 Good by day (of course evening fatigue). Good sharpness for its price, you notice chromatic aberration in the contrasts. Manual mass infinite focus ring like all Olympus base lenses. Zoom difficult to exploit on video. sent on December 28, 2018 |
 | Panasonic Lumix G 25mm f/1.7 ASPH Pros: Weight, size, price, construction, very good yield Cons: For the cost that has none. Opinion: The Nifty Fifty par excellence in terms of quality/price. In my opinion better than Olympus F 1.8 (costs double, 1.8 versus 1.7) and Panasonic 25 f1.4 (expensive 3 times just to have 1.4 and with pretty sharpness, bokeh and chromatic rendition) The manual focus ring is not as bad as it says , it is soft and fluid and with the assistance of the focus peaking of modern machines is difficult to err. The only flaw of the ring nut is the lack of the focus block min and Max. I use this lens on Panasonic G9 for portrait pictures but also landscape (especially in the evenings) and for videos. Very good AF/AFC focus. Minimum focus distance is not the best but it is not used for this function so I cannot feel it a fault. sent on December 28, 2018 |
 | Olympus 9mm f/8 Fish-Eye Body Cap Pros: Dimensions and excellent for very special photos (use moderated) Cons: F8, very poor optical quality. Opinion: Rating: 6. Lens to use for photos not of high quality but to remove some whim. unusable use with low brightness as indoor or evening, given the opening f8. Quality/Price a bit low (considering that Canon sells at about €120 a 50 mm f 1.8, not excellent but good). It is still a very comfortable and pocket accessory. sent on December 22, 2018 |
 | Panasonic G9 Pros: Autofocus, screen, LCD top (saves a lot of battery), battery life, rechargeable batteries from Powerbank or directly in the room, extreme customization, post-focus, 20 fps or 30 in 6k mode, stabilization, dual slot, file quality Excellent and truly crisp, tropicalization, High resolution mode extraordinary Cons: 150 and 180 fps only with MF, without audio, slowed down in the room and not with the highest quality, Opinion: Born in the World M4/3 I made the switch from a EM10 MII to this beast with a captivating design and the size of reflex. The latter due, I believe, from the amazing Stabilization (6.5 stop), from the upper backlit LCD screen (a must-have for comfort and savings), double SD-slot) and from the battery with considerable autonomy (the same as Gh5 and with Patoa Pro, the one with the Green writings, enough €20). In addition to design also the technical features are at par with high level reflex\\mirrorless of Canon, Nikon and Sony, really good quality photos and videos. Obviously you have to be careful of the low light as you have to take into account that it is an M4/3 (in my parerefoto usable up to ISO 3200-6400). Improved in videos for exploitability at the video editing level (the video clips are Sony for example, although with higher bitrates are workable more easily) Caution: High resolution mode only on tripod because the stabilization is absent since it is Pixel-shifting officer. Only real flaw the slowmotion, seems to have been inserted so much for recreation, you should enter the 120 FPS feature with autofocus, sound-recording and without slowdown in the room. sent on June 04, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
