|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Maxmax1956 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Maxmax1956  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X-S20 Pros: Beautiful and design, minimal size, featherweight, ergonomics and grip, flash, battery life, responsiveness, totally settable dials and buttons, very fast autofocus, good and totally articulated LCD, image quality, stabilized, price. They say quality videos. Cons: Plasticky, fragile appearance, lack of physical maf S-C-M selector, small viewfinder, mechanical shutter noise a bit jarring. It is not a flagship. Not tropicalized. Opinion: The aforementioned pros make it extremely pleasant to have with you, certainly it does not have the portability of a Ricoh III, but with the fixed Fuji f2 we are talking about 650 g and with the Sigma 18-50 800g. The three dials can be set at will and I organized them as I had them on the T4 and Pro3, including the four scrolls on the display. In fact, once everything is organized, it becomes rare to have to open the menu, only for particular settings, such as curves, various colors, etc. In addition, when necessary, my menu makes life easier. (Will Fuji come to churn out basic menus?). Unlike the other Fuji it does not have the physical selector for single/continuous/manual focus, and I don't like this, I consider it the most serious lack of the S20. For the rest the camera is fast (excellent processor 5) in any function, it turns on immediately, the af locks instantly and never gives up, it leads you to remove the A and work with the M, you manage well and quickly any exposure parameter without taking your eye off the viewfinder which, even if a little small, is enough to compose. The sensor is exceptional, I think that 26 mpx for an aps-c is "perfection", then managed by a cutting-edge processor like the 5. Files with the right weight (shot in JPG+RAW) well workable, partially croppable, low noise with high ISO, with a range that tolerates and forgives exposures against the laws of physics. Now it's 40, but for an aps-c I personally find the 26 more balanced and the results satisfy me. I use it as a second body, the first is a ff of 60 mpx and from 1200 g upwards depending on the case and with rows from another planet, however going out with the small and light S20 is fun, it puts you in a good mood. It starts as a toy and then becomes a cool and engaging shooting. It can be found new at about 1200 euros, used on 800, the f2.0 Fuji are taken used between 200 and 300 euros, so with 1100-1200 you have a good quality configuration, on the other hand you have to try to defend yourself from these freewheeling increases in the prices of the new. I share with Joofer that he is more than an entry level. With the Sigma 18-50 then it's a lot of stuff. For me it's a 9.5. sent on July 10, 2025 |
 | Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Pros: Like everyone else: optical quality and reliability. Contrary to all: THE WEIGHT and the COST (and I would also add the DIMENSIONS) Cons: If you start from the idea that you wanted to buy a zoom that covers you 24-82 with constant f/2.8: NONE Opinion: I've been using it for several months and I'm totally satisfied, on the road it's not true that it's heavy (on the T-30II total 1070 grams real, on the X-PRO3 total 1192 grams real) as in the interiors (with 2.8 and a bit of ISO there are no limits). Tropicalized indeed, with top-notch optical quality and made almost to military specifications. But the reason why I felt the need to include this review is that what I read in many of the previous reviews does not seem well thought out, as the weight and cost are always indicated in the "cons", and here I explain: this lens costs about 1100 euros and weighs 655 g; But have you seen how much the similar Zoom of other brands cost and weigh? Ok, I'll save you the trouble and I'll tell you: CANON RF 24-70 f/2.8 2449 euros and 900 g: NIKON Z 24-70 f/2.8 2188 euros and 805 g; PANASONIC LUMIX S PRO 24-70 1989 euros and 935 g....... And I'll stop there. So, in the light of these data, if you still think about the cost and the weight.... well! Better to sell it and replace it with three f/2s. I personally am sorry that it is about to go out of production. sent on May 10, 2024 |
 | Manfrotto Tracolla e zaino medio (MB MA-BP-TM) Pros: Elegant, refined and good quality materials Cons: Cross shoulder straps preposterous Opinion: It's definitely nice to see compact, top quality materials and shape geometrically defined and smooth, soft but at the same time not "Arsene and" neither empty nor full. Is divided into two sections, the lower one with compartments variables by means of Velcro Industries allocated to equipment photos and above all open set to what you want. At the bottom I enter two mirrorless (XE2 and XT20) with mounted lenses and other three lenses including the big 55-200, besides other three batteries with battery charger, flash, bulb, and other little things. The extraction of the rooms can be made without it off from the shoulders ruotandoselo on belly and its opening doesn't cause objects to fall. You can prepare it with cross-straps but, as he has already reportedly Diego, is uncomfortable neck and trim: unworkable. Only with traditional horizontal shoulder strap but sadly no messi at the front which fixed everything with more stability. Suitable for ML, given the cost, I don't know if I'd buy. sent on April 11, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
