|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Vocelibera www.juzaphoto.com/p/Vocelibera  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM Pros: Sharpness and image quality at the top of the category, low distortion to all focal points, contrast and colors, construction and resistance, excellent response of the dials, flare resistance, versatility Cons: weight, price but you know the quality it costs Opinion: objective with an indisputable image quality that is ideal for interiors, streetphoto, even night views until the release of the canon series 3 was the top on the market source analysis: DxoMark and Dpreview, today if they play it at even arms) surely another world for those like me came from the canon 16-35 f4 (excellent lens but lower especially in the distortion that is too pronounced on the canon) the classic focal distance 16-35 allows a good flexibility of use. Opening 2.8 on a lens like this can be useless for the most. but with this lens you can safely do streetphoto and wanting to go further in the even astro and some portrait (at 35mm clearly) the limits are the weight definitely important and the price but on the other hand this lens is worth what it costs and and in line with rivals Canon Nikon alternatives for those who want to experiment and and very good in composition composition I suggest to consider the 12-24 Sony that compared to the competitors in the same focal costs about the meta competition. for us look for lightness can consider the Tamron 17-28 that costs less but and much more sacrificed in the focal range, in my opinion too much in both sides, and qualitatively does not exalt me, rather flat photos less rich in detail and contrast... on the other hand it costs hundreds of euros less... sent on April 25, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Image quality, construction, okay for panoramas Cons: Distortion a little too accentuated, I do not recommend it for streetphoto and eye to distortion in the interior Opinion: Considering its price range it is a great lens for reflex. Good for views. He accompanied me to the deserts in Africa without ever any nasty surprises. Beautiful "stars on the sun" good focus Defects distorts a lot, which you expect from a wide angle under 24mm, but compared it to sony's 16-35 GM, Sony and another galaxy... also as a price... the Canon does not recommend it for streetphoto because of the distortion and also in the interior should be used with caution or you will find unnatural forms due to distortion (and no you will not be able to fix them on Lightroom). sent on April 25, 2020 |
 | Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS Pros: Focal excursion, compact, good yield up to 100mm, price, size and weight Cons: Yield drops much above the 100mm, the zoom in Opinion: According to a well-known lens testing site and the best zoommone better than the Canon L 28-300. Definitely acceptable up to 100mm on almost the entire frame, it becomes more and more soft over the 100mm. I don't know if I would recommend the purchase, I took it to take it in my travels, and smaller than a 70/200 2.8 but autofocus and sharpness are on another galaxy. Small and compact sent on April 01, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
