|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Shrieking www.juzaphoto.com/p/Shrieking  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4.0 IS Pro Pros: versatility, sharpness, construction, weight, Stabilization Cons: dark, weight Opinion: I have this lens for about 1 month, and what struck me the most was the frightening sharpness. Olympus on this one confirms to be one of the Supreme BRANDS. The stabilization... what about guys? On EM1 old, I snapped at 1/2 sec and the image is virtually motionless, microcontrast and sharpness at the edges across the focal range. The robustness and the quality of the materials is really top, the knurling of the zoom ring I find it perfect despite not being rubber. The grip is also perfect with gloves and the size is just for small hands as big as Mine. Usable without too much difficulty unlike microlenses like the 45 or the 17 (which I can not really use with gloves). The weight for me has a double face, as it is both a pro and a cons. It's not too much to curse every time it gets around your neck, but it's also superior to the classic prime lenses that Olympus has used Us. All the pros converge on the versatility, from 12 to 100 mm with constant opening make it the perfect combination of travel. You can do almost 99% of the shots without worrying about anything (tropicalization impeccable), you should not constantly change the lens, you should not worry about carrying several lenses and change them if necessary. The only downside that I would like to emphasize a little is the fact that on M43 an F/4 diaphragm is a bit too little, also given the ability to maintain a dynamic range acceptable to high ISO Sensor. Although there is a small pro on the diaphragm, and is that TA this lens splits the hair in 4, is already sharp at f4, to give the maximum (noticed empirically on my photos) to F 5.6 as almost all lenses Olympus. But for me it is a relative problem because as I click (almost always between 4 and 7.1) I always close it on the 17 f/1.8. I hate the #supermegasipersfocato EDIT: after 1 year of use, the lens is terrific in travel. I don't think there is such a versatile lens and so great optical and constructive quality. sent on January 31, 2018 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 Pros: Small and lightweight, Sharp, perfect assembly, good for the street Cons: A slight purple fringing on the exaggerated backlighting Opinion: Now I use this lens for about 3 years to my satisfaction. Since I bought I never dismantled by EM5, which in my way of seeing the system, it is the perfect body for this lens. Combined silver both makes you feel a little vintage when shooting, and this creates in the subjects taken a feeling of "home", thinking that the machine is a roll of film. The lens is razor sharp, and is perfect for reportage. I love the complexion, very flat. Optical deformations are practically inestistenti, though perhaps suffering a bit of purple fringing, but in very rare cases. The weight is his strong point, because, well being a first lens fast enough and made of metal, it is akin to the m43 system. sent on March 09, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
