|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gabriele Cucolo www.juzaphoto.com/p/GabrieleCucolo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Construction, maf dial, solidity, sharpness, blurry and... Weight! Cons: Sometimes he gets it wrong, but no one is perfect! Opinion: It took me a long time to try one. Years. Then I convinced myself. And today I can say that Sigma, at least in this focal point, defeats ANY competitor and (perhaps) is second only to Otus. As for construction and solidity, I dare call it from the past. Handling this "fifty" is real poetry. Some might argue that it weighs: well, in my opinion the weight is an unequivocal demonstration of the enormous quality of this lens, which does not create aberrations and does not pay large differences in sharpness between center, mid point and side. The blur is soft, pasty and progressive. Addictive. Yes, sometimes (rarely) loses fire, but at these levels it really happens to everyone, even those who, not being able to show such cleanliness and sharpness, have become famous for a so-called "magic", which is nothing but the desire of some - mostly fetishists of Canon L, like myself - to forgive flaws to their own expensive jewels. sent on July 11, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Incisiveness, absence of chromatic aberrations and distortions, excellent stabilizer, good construction. Cons: It's not a 2.8. But you knew it. Opinion: It is rare that I write reviews but this time I find it appropriate. This lens surprised me. A lens that has gone far beyond expectations and literally tears the 16-35 2.8 MkII for both incisiveness and cleanliness of the image (especially at the edges) as well as for construction. The stabilizer routs those already present on 24-70, 70-200 and 100 macros. Just think that I managed to shoot in the dark, freehand, at times with which it would have been indispensable a tripod, and while getting swishing stop car, I kept unchanged the incisiveness on static objects. Highly Recommended lens! sent on December 10, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM II Pros: Sharpness, fast and precise auto focus, bokeh, construction. Cons: I have not found it. Opinion: Hardly I write reviews but this time is a must. If some Sigma Art has always said that they were level at Otus home Zeiss, this 35mm completely redesigns the way of thinking for that focus. Precise, quiet, crisp at every opening, it is heavy, but as it should be for a view of this solid, mishandles fixed zoom colleagues and the best of all the competition. Before buying it, I had seen, test in hand, which was recorded by 35 and 50 Sigma Art, but to see it with their own eyes astounds. The price? Well, for a professional perspective of this kind it is an investment. sent on April 23, 2017 |
 | Canon 1DC Pros: Very high quality construction. Robust. Quality of files both in video and in photos. A 4K videos of tremendous value, even in comparison to the latest Sony & company. Grain. Flurry of professional level. Cons: The 4K 25p stops. Opinion: Perhaps now, in photography, 18 megapixel appear a little 'few, but in the face of a slightly less incisive than the average, this machine will get amazing results in terms of noise. It 'a real tank, a flagship without comparison even with the latest 1DX II, which does not have the C-Log. The MJpeg is lavorabilissimo and provides a color depth of the totally unexpected. The unmistakable pasta Canon makes it, in my opinion, clearly superior even to the latest Sony. In the photo, the burst is fantastic. The menu is clear and functions are really endless. At robustness it is then added dependability. Despite the years, he holds the market very well. A car, therefore, that in my opinion will not fear even obsolete for many years. sent on April 14, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 L II USM Pros: From the great sharpness, especially if rapoortata the type of lens and the opening is a lens that can be appreciated for the very blurry and extreme strength, which clearly shows off at every opportunity. Almost no distortion and great color rendition. Cons: The price is a bit 'high but for a professional is a must ... Opinion: Had already recommended a lens on the Canon 5D MK II. Now that the use of 5D MK III, I can feel it a real must, a lens to always carry and use in many occasions. And if it is true - in part - that the weight is a bit 'high, it is also true that I saw him take home perhaps unequaled performances to date. sent on October 27, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM Pros: A great lens from the excellent sharpness and bokeh. Obviously less versatile so noble 70-200 2.8 but it, on its focal length, is even better. Cons: I've never encountered. Opinion: I believe that when you want to point to advertise on a lens rather than another, manufacturers are teachers. The fact is that I do not understand why this lens has always been considered "secondary". In my opinion one of the best zoom lenses first and best that there is available. Highly recommended! sent on October 27, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
