|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
AlbeeBoo www.juzaphoto.com/p/AlbeeBoo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Lowepro Flipside 400 AW Pros: Very roomy, comfortable and secure, having the opening on the back. In my opinion a good price / quality Cons: No, it was what I was looking for Opinion: Using it mainly when I travel in Africa (and elsewhere) allows me to carry all the equipment, however, returning in size from cabin baggage. Obviously the weight limit of 7 kg is far exceeded. About 12 kg in the configuration below riportata.rnPuò holds two, in my case 5D3 with mounted 300 2.8 + 1.4, a side removed, 6D, 70-200 2.8 2.8 24-70 (Tamron) the second and 2x extender, just wanting also 50L. In the pockets sd and cf, battery, battery charger, adapter, documents, wallets, foreign currency etc., and other material that would rather have with me and not put in checked baggage. In case of loss I want to be independent from the side picture. Used in trekking for gorillas in total about 4/5 hour walk. Within two bodies with lenses mounted, 70-200 and 24-70 accessories and 1.5 l of water. All perfectly in balance. After several trips seams still in good condition. sent on June 30, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Versatile, compact and lightweight. Af fast and stabilizer though not of the latest generation still very good and fairly quiet. Pump system. Cons: None in particular. Opinion: I kept this lens less than a year, why I was not hurt but because the monkey 300 2.8 IS I won ... rnHo had a chance to use it for two weeks on safari in Botswana and I have to say that I was very pleased. The pump system I find it extremely comfortable and go from 100 to 400 mm and really a matter of tenths of a second. Closed is the size of the 70-200 f4 so it is comfortable. On 6d only slightly unbalanced forward to full extension. Although the project is a few years old, I find it a sharp lens and still unique as versatility and at this price. sent on December 08, 2013 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Quality of the file, iso, ergonomics Cons: None if you buy it with the awareness of the limitations sought by the house. If he lacks what kind af a better system, etc. would be a flurry 5D3 ... Opinion: I was looking for a machine with a file quality better than the 50D, and I found it. Usable up to ISO 6400. As for me up to 1600 do not even noise reduction. Besides if I did not need to go. No particular problem with the af often criticized. For me, better than the 50d. Using mainly the central point I never had any problems, but I had not even with the sides. Compared to the 50d the only limitation is the burst, under certain conditions have a few more shots per second could use. Under certain conditions of bright light tends to underexpose. sent on December 07, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Light weight, build quality, weather sealed, sharpness, stabilization and f at the top. Cons: No Opinion: Taken in 2008, this lens continues to give me a lot of satisfaction. It is an extremely versatile lens, in my various travels I have always carried with me together Extender 1.4 for greater reach. Allows you to travel light to reach 280mm F5.6 and still returns a good quality. The Af very fast allows to use the lens for different types of events. The only "flaw" if you can say so and aperture f4 which limits its use in places with low light. sent on March 02, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
