Reviews written by Dizeta

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Dizeta
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Dizeta

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Dizeta

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D

Pros: Light, compact, very good value for money

Cons: Soft to TA, quality construction, blurry hard, automatic MAF only for cameras with AF motor

Opinion: Undoubtedly, the Nikkor af-S 50mm G is better across the board than the old "D": sharpness already at TA, anti reflex treatment, internal af (precise and quiet), blurred softer, anti-dust rubber on the bayonet. Yet, perhaps because of the compactness, perhaps due to the presence of the aperture ring, perhaps for the chromatic rendering, for the blurry hard and nervous but characteristic, the old "D" has a fascination and a vintage yield (perhaps also because the design of the optical diagram goes back to The late 1970s). And even if TA is not sharpest, after 2.8 becomes very incisive, perhaps even more than the "G". It also has no distortion. In short, for the price at which you can find it for sale, is nothing short of convenient.

sent on May 30, 2018

Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 G

Pros: Weight, discrete optical quality, price

Cons: Plastic, absence VR, automatic MAF only on cameras with AF motor

Opinion: The materials and the construction made in economics can easily lead to think that the one between the hands can be nothing but a goal, composed of funds of bottle. Surprisingly though, the overall quality of the lenses is not that bad. Indeed from 70mm up to 200mm the optical yield is good; Over the 200mm decade but it still remains usable. Undoubtedly of qualitatively better alternatives (with VR and built-in AF motor) there are several; But for those who did not have special needs and for those who were satisfied with a telephoto zoom economic, light, with slow (and noisy) but precise, could be a valid choice. At the bottom, this 70-300mm, his work plays it more than decently.

sent on May 28, 2018