JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 G : Specifications and Opinions

Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 G

The Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 G is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2000 to 2019 (discontinued). The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 147 €;

26 users have given it an average vote of 8.1 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-300 mm
Angle of view	34.4 - 8.3°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4-5.6
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	13 elements in 9 groups
Min. focus distance	1.50 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.26x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	In-camera AF motor
Internal Focus	No
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	62 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	425 g
Dimensions	74 x 117 mm
Buy
Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 G, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Takeao

sent on April 11, 2024

Pros: Second-hand price, lightness. Other PROS? Don't have it.

Cons: Optics (at least the one I have) poor, not VR

Opinion: Regretted the purchase because, although it has two camera bodies, I was not able to take a photo worthy of being called such. I didn't do well not to take it without VR because my wrist is very wobbly but even on a tripod it returns very bad images. On long focal lengths? It is better to draw a veil of pity! Yes, it's true I paid little for it but it was wasted money... even if they are few. Wanting to resell it seems to me like throwing a bin at someone else: Nikon, but what have you done?

Cristian.s

sent on October 13, 2023

Pros: Light weight, discrete optical yield considering the cost range. Economic.

Cons: Completely made of plastic, slow AF, the silver version (which I still have) was combined with the silver analog F55 (which I still have). It is not stabilized.

Opinion: It is a G-type optics, so the diaphragms are controlled by the camera body. Autofocus only works with digital cameras with internal focus motor (type D90; D300 etc), in the other (entry level) without internal focus motor it is necessary to focus by hand and on this lens it is not easy to do so because the ring is very narrow. The yield on film was not bad. One day I came up with the idea of trying it on the D90 and I was amazed at the more than decent performance, it also returns (not if it is my impression) a very "analog" rendering with soft and soft colors. You have to be careful of the flare in the backlight, but I personally liked them in certain photos. You also get good blurs at high focal lengths. Attention in digital because in the F55 it sucked a little dust.

Oldman76

sent on December 19, 2019

Pros: Light, excellent yield (in relation to price) very effective anti-reflective treatment, wide excursion, up to 200mm sharp and defined already at TA, minimum focus 1.5 meters. Low price

Cons: Except the lenses are all plastic, at the maximum focal length loses in sharpness, is not very bright, does not have the physical ring of diaphragms, af not very fast and not motorized, the silver version is unwatchable

Opinion: Optical purchased in 2002 to have a battle canvas to use on an analog f65 turned out to be a good lens especially in relation to the purchase price. Dusted on the d200 (where it becomes a 140-450 mm) and currently in use on the d600 surprised me for the excellent yield up to 200mm, after you have to close a few stops to have good results, the colors are quite neutral, maybe just tending to the cold. The anti-reflection treatment is excellent, flare and ghost practically absent, just a slight loss of contrast in the most extreme situations, very solvable in post, at most just mount its lampshade. It has a pleasant blurry, which combined with the focal length allows you to make close-ups remaining at a proper distance, useful when between you and the subject there are, or there must be several meters. the resolution is great, from 70 to 200 you can use ta or at most close a couple of stops, besides it is better to close at least f8 or f11 to have a good definition. This problem is felt more on full frame, on the apsc is better because because of the crop factor, it takes only the best part of the lens, the center. Light and unwieldy, it allows you to walk, car around the neck without playing the cervical to the sera.la minimum distance of 1.5 m combined with the long focal allows you to take "almost macro" photos to objects not too small ( flowers, butterflies, insects medium.large). Let's come to the downsides. The construction is cheap, all plastic, even the bayonet, so be gable to take shots on the lens. the zoom dial is not bad, but at 300 mm the lens doubles its length and you feel a certain game of the barrel, the maf's dial is instead small, uncomfortable and has a short and completely free ride, difficult to sew into manual if you do not have small fingers . The brightness is what it is, but with recent bodies you can climb with iso with some tranquility. The AF takes advantage of the engine of the machine, so for entry levers that do not have the engine in the machine body, no AF. The speed is not comparable to the current AMs but it is not even that bad, I also used it for sporting events in AFc mode and if it got away with it with dignity, the speed depends on the body machine in these cases. As in all G lenses lacks the physical diaphragm diaphragm, on modern bodies no problem, but on analog you may have limitations, on my f90x, I can use it only in P mode. For the price at which it is today I would like to recommend it to those who have made the switch to full frame and is discovered on the canvas side( and on the financial side). For less than 100 euros you take a good lens, a little plastic but with an optical compartment still very valid, to carry around without too many patemi and weights. If you decide to buy it, the silver version costs on average 20 euros less than the black, but it is really tamarrissima.

Dizeta

sent on May 28, 2018

Pros: Weight, discrete optical quality, price

Cons: Plastic, absence VR, automatic MAF only on cameras with AF motor

Opinion: The materials and the construction made in economics can easily lead to think that the one between the hands can be nothing but a goal, composed of funds of bottle. Surprisingly though, the overall quality of the lenses is not that bad. Indeed from 70mm up to 200mm the optical yield is good; Over the 200mm decade but it still remains usable. Undoubtedly of qualitatively better alternatives (with VR and built-in AF motor) there are several; But for those who did not have special needs and for those who were satisfied with a telephoto zoom economic, light, with slow (and noisy) but precise, could be a valid choice. At the bottom, this 70-300mm, his work plays it more than decently.

Vaake

sent on August 21, 2017

Pros: Light and compact, discreet the smoothness of the zoom ring, optically very good almost equal to the 70-300 AF-S VR, beautifully blurred ... but above all Pro Pro is ... the price !, amazing!

Cons: Plastic bayonet and entry level construction, AF lens but precise, then obviously the absence of the VR that imposes high ISO shots to stay in safety. FX lens that can not be used in non-motorized DXs.

Opinion: Unknown lens, no coincidence is the first review here on Juza. Unknown but still in production, it is now only in the black version at prices to say the least tattered, I took it again to less than 100 euros! And for that figure I was not expecting any kind of optical rendering, comparable to the heavy and expensive AF-S 70-300 VR years ago, so very clear up to 200, then softens, but the 300 with a good PP are usable. Highly recommended for those who like me use the canvas very sporadically and do not want excessive burdens in the backpack. The AF is certainly not suitable for flying birds, but it is not slow. Not having the VR for the shutter speeds you have to stay with the high ISO, but for the recent FX as my D750 is not a problem. Surprising for value for money, prove it.

Photos taken with Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 G

"Sturm und Drang" ..

by Gionskj
383 comments, 27488 views

HI RES 5.1 MP

Photographer!

by Giorgio Meneghetti
104 comments, 11178 views

Overview of Torrechiara

by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
3 comments, 6263 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Fishing

by Miloga
158 comments, 5305 views

Into the Wild

by Bruno Di Bernardo
26 comments, 4514 views

A model .... in Piazza Grande

by Fabrizio Pocci
119 comments, 5628 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Grand Canyon - Arizona - USA

by Afrikachiara
2 comments, 4336 views

Absorbed in thoughts

by Fabrizio Pocci
85 comments, 5000 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

New Year's Eve Fireworks!

by Gionskj
75 comments, 877 views

HI RES 12.6 MP

An angle of light

by Fabrizio Pocci
89 comments, 2710 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

Comacchio

by Giorgio Meneghetti
25 comments, 3086 views

Just one look

by Fabrizio Pocci
58 comments, 3163 views

HI RES 10.9 MP

I will go to distant lands ..

by Gionskj
32 comments, 1972 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

The dawn

by EnricoGiuliani
23 comments, 525 views

HI RES 10.6 MP

Lunch time

by Toffa77
25 comments, 1641 views

Between the fog

by Fabrizio Pocci
62 comments, 2160 views

Resist

by Paoloanchini
24 comments, 3093 views

The good I want you

by Miloga
60 comments, 1457 views

Class of yesteryear

by Fabrizio Pocci
34 comments, 2849 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

To each his own world

by Miloga
64 comments, 2597 views

Our fog

by Miloga
74 comments, 2034 views

Age

by Giorgio Meneghetti
23 comments, 3648 views

Poppies

by Bruno Di Bernardo
8 comments, 2745 views

Hands!

by Giorgio Meneghetti
20 comments, 2769 views

Lotus flowers

by Miloga
38 comments, 2358 views

Kneeling by you

by Miloga
54 comments, 2452 views

Puffin 1

by Toffa77
19 comments, 1221 views

HI RES 16.1 MP

5 colors on the lake

by Fabrizio Pocci
20 comments, 1944 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

Puffin at will!

by Toffa77
21 comments, 1176 views

An unusual image from the valley

by Fabrizio Pocci
60 comments, 1410 views

HI RES 6.5 MP

Abandoned houses

by Fabrizio Pocci
31 comments, 2110 views

HI RES 9.6 MP

The show of dolomite peaks

by Fabrizio Pocci
62 comments, 1753 views

Customs and traditions

by Fabrizio Pocci
32 comments, 2004 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

Thoughts ...

by Civic76
11 comments, 1917 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

The Moon of July 15 now high

by EnricoGiuliani
14 comments, 368 views

HI RES 10.6 MP

Imaginary train

by Civic76
16 comments, 2091 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

The Super Moon of the Deer

by EnricoGiuliani
11 comments, 494 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Nikon » Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 G

Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 G : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 G