|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lorenzomira84 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lorenzomira84  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 G Pros: Good price for performance. Tropicalized. Very good field depth. Net depth of field. Cons: Makes curious about brother f1.4. Opinion: A good optic would say. F1.8 at high magnifications are visible traces of aberration in the contours but also in this lens is resolved at the next stop. The best yield between incisiveness in the foreground and blurred place at f2.8. At f 3.5 I would say that it is already at the maximum of sharpness. Closed diaphragm degradation is quite contained. Sharpness is almost excessive in the portrait but can be solved by lowering the machine's sharpness at the same time, and at the same time you can appreciate it for glimpses of landscapes or more naturalistic images. sent on August 24, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Very affordable price, works fairly well. Cons: All I bought was resistant to any climatic conditions (it also has a gasket to the body behind it, but before it does not seem so sealed as the hike and backslide are communicating to the outside of the lens by varying the internal volume. Opinion: Those who do not want to go beyond f1.4 have a decent alternative. F1.8 at high magnifications can be visible light contours aberrations chromatic, but not excessive, after a stop is resolved. At f2.8 it works very well eaf 4 i would say it is to the fullest detail. No undesirable degradation is known even to very closed diaphragms. RnDo not forget maybe that having the front lens somewhat snoozed, leaves plenty of void space between any protective filters. In special light, intense, flash, or backlight conditions if unexpected effects occur, remember to make the naked eye work. I'm in favor of the protectors because the optics can always be cleaned and not having to clean is better, but always keep in mind that optics are designed with naked and hooded. sent on August 24, 2017 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: Fullframe. Discrete battery life. Accepts all optics with Fmount Attack including those of the modified Nikon Ft. Clear eye view. Large handle and pen positioned controls. Tropicalized in large part. Very detailed and complete functions. Preview depth of field, complete functions for using flash drives. Stable to slightly higher iso. The sensor also drops to iso 50 Cons: Call me home. 24mega pixel. The uneven or uneven mirror mirrored cmq mechanism. The price could be right, in optimum conditions and without the unexpected. Opinion: Socket for switching from d5200 Dx to Fx Fullframe. I clicked off manually, and I needed a wide and sharp view of the frame even to focus manually. The battery gives good autonomy, even if one or two batteries are better to have them. RnBack up all versions of previous goals. Goals G, D full-featured, AI goals. It also accepts pre AI and Q-AUTO lenses if modified to pair the diaphragm with the meter. (Modify who knows about mechanics, with caliber and metal file can also do it at home). The machine has a good grip and good position of the controls. With a little patience setting up well and learning a bit, the eye is no longer out of sight. Holding a bigger iso is not infinite but there is. At 400-800 iso still has a decent picture. Well acceptable even at 1000-1600 iso. RnThe fine resolution is discrete, but pixel density is still halved compared to dx 24mega sensors. ThisIt should be said because who like me comes from this road the difference is the note right away, and this difference must be seen with awareness before a purchase. To take advantage of the Fx optics to their entire visual field however, it is a good advantage to put on the scale plate . RnOn less positive notes .. Tropicalization is present, but not complete as the wiring on the screen seems inadequate. Potential risk of shutter blocks seems to be taken into account, and the defects in the interior of the room box are not a problem for the backlights. Although I am not among the serial ones I still have this flare problem that splashes horizontally against the sensor with intense lights even off-field. The hood does not minimally solve the problem. All the while official assistance promises that they will also solve my case. In view of this I think the theoretically good and fair price for the type of product performance, less appropriate for the discomfort I'm having now and that I will have when I send it to help if everything goes for the best. During l% 2In addition to the problem already documented, I will also report excessive unbalancing of the mirror to the lift as it does not limit the free long handouts. I've always been quietly in security, so I'm struggling to stay in it. In this case, the microregion always has a precise direction, and it is definitely due to the counterclocking of the mirror that it feels to touch the hand. Good m-up function in cases where it can be used eg for tripods, but not for normal shooting. RnSpecify a spear about shooting times .. only 14,000 can even go .. For many years they shot with 500 -1000 and 2000 .. There are also ND filters if you need to ... sent on August 24, 2017 |
 | Nikon D5200 Pros: 24m pixels on sensor 18x24mm. Accept any lens with Fmount attack in M ??mode. Never had dirt on the sensor. Cons: Small handle for medium and large hands. Not high autonomy. There is no basic function. Opinion: Fine detail resolution overcomes all other nikon including 36mega full frame pixels. Counting on the hand there is little to say about this point. A full frame should have nearly 50m pixel to have the same detail. Conversely, it forces you to not shoot at bigger than 400iso, otherwise noise makes the fine detail useless. Despite that I used it very well at night and flanked on a telescope with good results at low ISO long minutes always win although this requires more laborious placements like Bigourdan. The sensor never broke me despite endless gear changes (almost fixed focal lengths) and nighttime hours with the open sensor with mirror telescopes. Not very good battery, one battery can be enough to discharge, in other cases two or even three depending on the use. The handle is very small and with a firm grip almost certainly presses the cross cursor involuntarily. Accept lenses even in the Q series and at least in M ??allows you to use some good old optics. RiguardOr settings unfortunately lack fast-timing sincroflash, and some m-up type functions to separate the mirror motion from the shutter. A thumbnail preview would be appreciated. The telescope orientable display is a jolly not just as in other unfavorable positions. I think this is a commercially speaking low-key car that, if well exploited, can give you the best bites at the top of the peak, although unfortunately you must remember that you can not have the flexibility and completeness of other more professional models. sent on August 24, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
