RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Edmondo
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Edmondo



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Edmondo


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

olympus_40-150_f2-8Olympus M.Zuiko ED 40-150mm f/2.8 Pro

Pros: All

Cons: Nothing

Opinion: What can I say, I can only answer Mattia.a who finds the Zuiko 12-100 f.4 Pro this 40-150 f.2.8 Pro and even the 150-400 f.4.5 PRO and who knows what other optics of the Olympus brand poor sharpness and other incomprehensible defects. There are two things, or he does not know how to photograph or he does not understand a blessed mace, I find that these three optics are absolute masterpieces for construction but above all for sharpness and microcontrast, with all three I have made 70x100 prints and I can guarantee that the difference with Full Frame does not exist absolutely also owning Sony. Before making reviews you should make peace with the brain and above all know how to take photographs ??

sent on September 30, 2022


panasonic_g9Panasonic G9

Pros: A great camera that today you buy at really inviting cost, great autofocus unlike the bullshit that some users write, image quality, ergonomics, really unique general functions.

Cons: Nothing perhaps unlike the Olympus EM1X with which I work as MICRO4OTERZI a lower resistance to high iso, it seems to me that over 1600 and already these are already a limit in my opinion, there is a really annoying noise that can still be solved in post production.

Opinion: Great camera repeat that today you buy new under 1000 euros and it is worth them all, lightning autofocus 0.4 seconds a crazy speed, on the tip and shoots maybe only Olympus with the EM1X equals it but it costs twice as much, having also Sony and having worked with Fuji I can say that this jewel of Panasonic outperforms them. Nothing can be said about tracking, in my opinion having used it both on sports and naturalistic photos is very good, better than Olympus that struggles more but certainly not better than Sony alpha 9 that I use for the most. Otherwise a camera with many merits, I believe that some users should first learn to photograph knowing at least the fundamentals of photography and then judge, I read reviews on this site that I sometimes consider a real fun for the stupid ities that are written, however in my opinion an absolute 10 camera to recommend absolutely with an unsurpassed quality price ratio.

sent on May 27, 2021


olympus_150-400tc_proOlympus M.Zuiko 150-400mm f/4.5 TC1.25x IS Pro

Pros: Superlative optics, really crazy sharpness, great portability with the possibility of leaving the tripod at home weighs only about 1,800 gr. practically more or less like a Canon 70-200 f.2.8, unique focal extension with built-in multiplier a 375-1000mm. f.5,6 fixed multiplied externally with Zuiko TC 1,4X you get to an extension of 1400mm. F.8 with a still satisfactory image quality, externally duplicated with Zuiko TC 20x you get to 2000mm. F.11 but not advisable in my opinion made extremely soft and almost useless, it could be interesting at this focal probably only for some long-distance video shooting. High cost but worth every euro, extremely impeccable construction, a unique lens of its kind that every photographer who deals with action photos such as sports and nature should have.

Cons: An excellent quality optics that is penalized only by machine bodies that do not amplify its quality as they are still very far from the self-focus tracking systems especially of Canon and Sony, although I must say that the Olympus EM1X when it manages to hook the subject the few frames it manages to capture are absolutely perfect.

Opinion: A lens as already mentioned of very high cost and definitely below the Canon and Nikon standards that in addition to costing about twice to be transported it would take a sherpa, heavy over 3kg. The Zuiko 150-400mm. you can consider a top of its kind for decidedly unique characteristics, great sharpness at all focals great three-dimensionality, detail that does not even drop to 1000mm. Very respectable focal for those who deal above all with naturalistic photos, zoom extension with internal movement, tropicalized with a granite construction like the optics of this class while weighing only 1,800 gr. A dream lens that deserves a nice 10 and highly recommended and clearly to those who can afford it.

sent on May 20, 2021


olympus_em1xOlympus OM-D E-M1X

Pros: Compactness-stabilization always at the top, in my opinion Olympus is leader-high resolution decidedly improved

Cons: Quality in extreme situations, high ISO still high seas, overpriced price.

Opinion: I can not express myself at best, but still proved today in a demonstration, it seemed excellent from an ergonomic point of view but it was also before, I left Olympus two years ago and already with the OMD EM1 Mark II The ergonomics was already at the top, so from the aesthetic point of view there It is little to admire, I would have expected a more appealing look, (clearly personal opinion). I was always a big fan of Olympus but from the shots made today I could ascertain that the high ISO quality remains a sore point, even if it is normal given the small size of the sensor, up to 1600 ISO quality is satisfactory and I emphasize satisfactory , then the file degrades and the quality drops almost irreparably, however the knead file is low dynamic range, since the product is aimed at an audience that makes the nature and sports photos the kind of primary importance, we are not, who works in These sectors know perfectly what it means to shoot when the light does not allow you and therefore you are obliged to raise the sensitivity. Certainly ten years ago, when Olympus made its debut with the WD EM5 there was a kind of revolution, I sold all my Canon material to move to Microquattroterzi, and I must say that all these years, then passing from the OMD EM5 Mark II to the OMD EM1 and Then at MARK II, I enjoyed a world, little weight and so much quality. Unfortunately it is when you use in extreme situations that Olympus must give way to the larger sensors, currently working with Canon, Sony, and Fuji, and I could no longer go back, the quality is excellent, and in extreme situations work quietly especially with Canon and Sony at 6400 ISO sometimes as in the case of Canon EOS 1DX MARK II I pulled up to 16,000 ISO photographing the Palio of Siena at 9.00 in the evening, thing impossible for Olympus, also if ten years ago one of the strengths was the practicality today was overtopped by Sony and From Fuji, cameras that are equivalent to weights, for example with Sony Alpha 9 + 100-400 We are around the 2 kg grip included, ditto with Fuji with XT3 and 100-400, but unlike we do not forget that the sensors are larger. In The last thing that I was most disappointed was the price, 3000 euros are an exaggerated amount, there you can ' buy almost a Sony Alpha 9 top camera in all respects and full frame, and anyway a Fuji XT3 that I consider a crazy camera in my Even more performanc for speed, for example in cropping mode you go from 26 to 16 mega but reaching 30 frames per second, and it costs about a third. That said I do not want to denigrate the qualities of this new product Olympus that I do not know in its entirety, surely will find in the already owners of the brand of safe buyers, but personally I was hoping for something really new and revolutionary that I It would have encouraged to return owner of one of the brands that I have always loved, so it was not, patience, Olympus remains a strong compromise with interesting qualities but also huge problems that today you can no longer afford because the market has changed a lot and Brands like Sony & Fuji make it and will be the master for many years to come.

sent on February 16, 2019


olympus_omd_em5Olympus OM-D E-M5

Pros: Lightweight, compact design combined with robust construction, magnesium alloy body and especially to tropical autofocus lightning in all lighting conditions, virtually no noise up to 800/1000 ISO, excellent management until 3200 and also very good at 6400 iso , excellent AF-C tracking, unique 5-axis stabilization system works spectacularly speed 'operational 9 frames per sec.riprese video magnificent, excellent management and quality' in both jpeg in Raw, definitely excellent viewfinder and sharp even in low light, inltre information-rich, high-quality touch display 'very good.

Cons: As far as I'm concerned none of relief, and 'a new system and as a first approach to define the product unique and quality' really beautiful at 360 ° ..

Opinion: I think the OLYMPUS OMD EM5 a unique product and superior to restricted competition, its success and 'due largely to the huge demand that prompted both domestically and not, the Japanese are' really doing major numbers that recall the success output in 1972 of the OM series, which gave much trouble to the competition of the time, it happens in the first place CANON and NIKON. Personally, I use to work also with bodies CANON 7D - 1D Mark III - 1D Mark IV with different optics, but I must admit that I prefer to take the exit of the WCO with the latter usually harbor with me 3 complete bodies of battery pack + 10 / 11 optics and everything weighs as much as a MARK IV equipped with the zoom 70-200 IF L II, for what concerns the quality 'not nothing to envy to the big market, I believe that only the FF sensors can really make a difference . Over the years I've gone from embracing different genres to CANON NIKON OLYMPUS four thirds and to another, but the quality 'of this camera leaves you flabbergasted, and many of my professional friends have been banned in the view filesthis jewel can bake, characterized by dynamic range and a micro-absolutely gorgeous. Another praise the quality 'optical undisputed Zuiko lenses for Micro Four Thirds that sometimes come at a cost equal to one third of the houses more' noble but with a quality 'truly amazing. Now you can not 'nothing but wait for Photokina where for sure there will be new news' and also' to confirm that the system is' young and growing, but that the product 'can, in my opinion to tackle any photographic situation, from reportage to landscape, fotonaturalistica (pending optics right) to the photo studio etc etc without any limitation.

sent on July 20, 2012




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me