|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fdise www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fdise  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM Pros: Brightness, edge yield, build quality Cons: Price, lack is, size Opinion: I had the F4 16-35 and last year I switched to the F 2.8 mainly for a speech of brightness (using it a lot, as well as for landscapes, even for photos of reportage and weddings for which the more brightness made me comfortable as well as throat), but if you click Mostly landscape photos I definitely recommend the F4 version. I have not done tests nor ever made and I am interested, but after 3 years of F4 and 1 of f 2.8 III I can say that at the level of sharpness between the two I have not noticed a big difference, indeed.. Surely at F11 I do not think they are recognizable photos made with one or the other lens. Having said that that extra brightness, especially in certain photographic areas, can be really worth it. On the other hand, considering that the f 2.8 costs exactly twice the F4, besides the fact that it weighs more, is more cumbersome and loses the IS, rate really if it agrees this optical or the F4 version, but surely I do not think that the differences are worth twice the Price, which I consider still too high. (I must say that I was amazed at the fact that today there is only a review of this lens, which is probably the best wide angle of the Canon house, there will be some reason...? boh) sent on June 21, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: Sharpness, size and dimensions new objective lens hood, AF Cons: Lack of the SI and price Opinion: I was very undecided whether to sell my 24-105 to move to 24-70 for a number of reasons, among which in the first place: greater outlay of money, as in less than 35mm focal range and loss of the stabilizer. Besides all I was undecided whether to take the 24-70 Canon or that of the Tamron, that at half the price offered as well stabilizer. I eventually sold the 24-105 and I opted for the Canon and I must say that expectations have not left me disappointed. I use it mounted on the 6D and pulls out the images with clarity / quality really impressive, so I can say that I am satisfied. Of course I could not say if the price difference compared to 24-105 is justified or not, but I believe that there is a right answer or a wrong, but it depends on the needs and availability of each. As for the comparison with the Tamron would not know because in the end I got to try it. But I can say that compared to the excellent Canon 24-70 The difference is, for image quality, size, weight, paralight much less cumbersome and finally the lens is closed at 24 and extended to 70 and not vice versa as in the first version (which frankly was decidedly uncomfortable). sent on March 10, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
