JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2016. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2039 €;

30 users have given it an average vote of 9.5 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	16-35 mm
Angle of view	107.1 - 63.5°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	16 elements in 11 groups
Min. focus distance	0.28 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.25x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	No
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	82 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	790 g
Dimensions	88 x 127 mm
Buy
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM , buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Ttak

sent on December 26, 2016

Pros: Image quality: Sharpness + Colors + Contrast + micro contrast; F 2.8: low light + astro-photography

Cons: Weight and SIZE and maybe price

Opinion: Nothing is complete, Best image quality I've seen + one of the biggest wide lenses I've seen. Overall I am happy with the results, even sharper than 16-35 F4L IS!!But the SIZE and maybe the price makes it a hard choice for most. However, I do really wonder why there is not any 15mm, 16mm, 17mm, 18mm small prime lens from canon! 14mm is too wide for my taste and 20mm is not as wide as I want; a 4mm of FL range but an extensive difference. for now I am going to stick to the Zeiss 18mm f3.5 which is wide, and small.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Editore

sent on September 29, 2018

Pros: sharpness, brightness, edge yield, contrast and micro contrast, tropicalization, sturdiness, high build quality.

Cons: Price

Opinion: Before him I had the EF 16-35mm f/4l IS USM and later the Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD. This Canon is superior to both without a shadow of a doubt. In my personal ranking is positioned at the top staccato little from the Tamron while farther you place the 16-35 F/4 that Pecca, compared to the first two of less sharpness. Nothing dramatic, but the Tamron and the 16-35 f/2.8 III are really very sharp. The difference between the two is that the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM is always sharp, from 16 to 35, from the center to the edges and even at full aperture. The Tamron does not have sharp edges like the Canon and from 22-24 onwards it deteriorates altogether its performance. In short, this lens is fabulous, it returns you some files that look alive, three-dimensional, with a total yield impossible for the excellent Tamron pur (which I repeat to be an excellent lens) and with an embarrassing sharpness. Rightly the question that is often addressed is whether it is compared to brother F/4 since it costs twice as much. Is this price difference really worth it? For me yes, especially if you have a camera with many pixels that enhance this lens.

Maurizio Cascone

sent on June 30, 2018

Pros: Sharpness | F/2.8 | L Series | Colors | Contrast | tropicalization | Build quality.

Cons: None worthy of note.

Opinion: I state that photographer mainly in weddings and events, then the light optics are obligatory, the lack of stabilization is not felt in these areas since it is not necessary to freeze the action, maybe for landscapes and similar stuff would have done Comfortable but also you use the tripod. The brightness of this 16-35mm makes it perfect for reportage, a stop in more brightness than the F/4 version means that in low light you have a stop in less than ISO getting cleaner photos, then the rendering of this optic with its colors and Contrast make it a perfect lens for its kind. It is not a cheap and very light lens, it is a professional lens of the L series, therefore the top. For amateurs I recommend the F/4 version much cheaper and with almost equal overall yield plus has the stabilization that can help in certain circumstances, for professionals or advanced amateurs who work at the professional level then this is the lens that makes For you. I didn't get to try the previous version so I can't give opinions about it. I hope this my opinion has been of help, a cordial greeting greeting and good light to all!!! ;)

Fdise

sent on June 21, 2018

Pros: Brightness, edge yield, build quality

Cons: Price, lack is, size

Opinion: I had the F4 16-35 and last year I switched to the F 2.8 mainly for a speech of brightness (using it a lot, as well as for landscapes, even for photos of reportage and weddings for which the more brightness made me comfortable as well as throat), but if you click Mostly landscape photos I definitely recommend the F4 version. I have not done tests nor ever made and I am interested, but after 3 years of F4 and 1 of f 2.8 III I can say that at the level of sharpness between the two I have not noticed a big difference, indeed.. Surely at F11 I do not think they are recognizable photos made with one or the other lens. Having said that that extra brightness, especially in certain photographic areas, can be really worth it. On the other hand, considering that the f 2.8 costs exactly twice the F4, besides the fact that it weighs more, is more cumbersome and loses the IS, rate really if it agrees this optical or the F4 version, but surely I do not think that the differences are worth twice the Price, which I consider still too high. (I must say that I was amazed at the fact that today there is only a review of this lens, which is probably the best wide angle of the Canon house, there will be some reason...? boh)

Photos taken with Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM

"Dragon Eggs"

by Roksolyana Hilevych
188 comments, 15058 views [editors pick]

Return to Home

by Luisa60
139 comments, 13893 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.2 MP

The clock is ticking

by Lucas88
51 comments, 6952 views [editors pick]

“White chrome”

by Roksolyana Hilevych
37 comments, 5534 views [editors pick]

My Iceland

by Gianni Zanella
59 comments, 12189 views

Fanal magic forest....

by Valerio Colantoni
41 comments, 5394 views [editors pick]

HI RES 8.2 MP

" The Young Sculptor of Sappada "

by Tiber
59 comments, 7970 views [editors pick]

HI RES 22.7 MP

Elena

by Elfiche
173 comments, 13148 views

HI RES 9.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Lighthouse de la Entallada

by Elfiche
193 comments, 6416 views

HI RES 27.5 MP

Northen Light in Senja

by Luisa60
65 comments, 9595 views

Let the light be.............

by Elfiche
193 comments, 6161 views

HI RES 24.9 MP

Sunset in Bruneck

by Nicolò Vedele
42 comments, 6257 views

"Fire lily"

by Roksolyana Hilevych
34 comments, 4422 views

Julia and the curves of the fountain

by Elfiche
165 comments, 7174 views

HI RES 13.1 MP

Love

by Elfiche
144 comments, 4784 views

HI RES 14.1 MP

The Charisma

by Elfiche
193 comments, 5239 views

HI RES 6.6 MP

Common Owl-Long eared Owl

by Fabrizio Moglia
35 comments, 4577 views

Who am I? What are they?

by Elfiche
171 comments, 4906 views

HI RES 24.4 MP

Sunrise in Fuerteventura

by Elfiche
184 comments, 5476 views

HI RES 28.9 MP

The Far West? NO It's FUERTEVENTURA 2

by Elfiche
176 comments, 4319 views

HI RES 23.5 MP

Lauren

by Peppe Cancellieri
99 comments, 4100 views

HI RES 18.6 MP

The Dome of the Rock - Jerusalem

by Elfiche
154 comments, 5048 views

HI RES 23.6 MP

THE FAR WEST? NO It's FUERTEVENTURA

by Elfiche
163 comments, 4986 views

HI RES 30.1 MP

Alessia

by Elfiche
180 comments, 5203 views

" Peter and the Distant Lake "

by Tiber
63 comments, 3489 views

HI RES 38.4 MP

"Ice Flower"

by Roksolyana Hilevych
34 comments, 4101 views

Sexy Bride

by Alessandro Colle
21 comments, 9504 views

Flowers

by Lucas88
17 comments, 5442 views [editors pick]

Appearances are deceiving

by Federico Delucchi
28 comments, 4611 views

HI RES 50.3 MP

A prayer for Paola Tim and all of us from Juza

by Elfiche
137 comments, 3696 views

HI RES 14.7 MP

Aurora lagoon

by Luisa60
49 comments, 5714 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Lights and Shadows on Genoa

by Elfiche
194 comments, 4675 views

HI RES 18.5 MP

Colors of the Tovel

by Nicola Valsecchi
46 comments, 2421 views

Happy Christmas Wishes

by Elfiche
221 comments, 4859 views

HI RES 8.8 MP

"Halo of Gold"

by Roksolyana Hilevych
36 comments, 2716 views

Hamnoy, classic view

by Nicola Valsecchi
43 comments, 2890 views

Misurina, 180 seconds of sunset

by Gianni Zanella
26 comments, 2512 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM