RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM : Specifications and Opinions




Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM



The Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2016. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2029 €;
22 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos




 Specifications
 Focal lenght   16-35 mm
 Angle of view   107.1 - 63.5°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/2.8
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   16 elements in 11 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.28 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.25x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, interal
 Stabilization   No
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   82 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   790 g
 Dimensions   88 x 127 mm
Buy Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM , buy on Ebay


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 200000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





avatarjunior
sent on December 26, 2016

Pros: Image quality: Sharpness + Colors + Contrast + micro contrast; F 2.8: low light + astro-photography

Cons: Weight and SIZE and maybe price

Opinion: Nothing is complete, Best image quality I've seen + one of the biggest wide lenses I've seen. Overall I am happy with the results, even sharper than 16-35 F4L IS!!But the SIZE and maybe the price makes it a hard choice for most. However, I do really wonder why there is not any 15mm, 16mm, 17mm, 18mm small prime lens from canon! 14mm is too wide for my taste and 20mm is not as wide as I want; a 4mm of FL range but an extensive difference. for now I am going to stick to the Zeiss 18mm f3.5 which is wide, and small.

Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on September 29, 2018

Pros: sharpness, brightness, edge yield, contrast and micro contrast, tropicalization, sturdiness, high build quality.

Cons: Price

Opinion: Before him I had the EF 16-35mm f/4l IS USM and later the Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD. This Canon is superior to both without a shadow of a doubt. In my personal ranking is positioned at the top staccato little from the Tamron while farther you place the 16-35 F/4 that Pecca, compared to the first two of less sharpness. Nothing dramatic, but the Tamron and the 16-35 f/2.8 III are really very sharp. The difference between the two is that the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM is always sharp, from 16 to 35, from the center to the edges and even at full aperture. The Tamron does not have sharp edges like the Canon and from 22-24 onwards it deteriorates altogether its performance. In short, this lens is fabulous, it returns you some files that look alive, three-dimensional, with a total yield impossible for the excellent Tamron pur (which I repeat to be an excellent lens) and with an embarrassing sharpness. Rightly the question that is often addressed is whether it is compared to brother F/4 since it costs twice as much. Is this price difference really worth it? For me yes, especially if you have a camera with many pixels that enhance this lens.

avatarjunior
sent on June 30, 2018

Pros: Sharpness | F/2.8 | L Series | Colors | Contrast | tropicalization | Build quality.

Cons: None worthy of note.

Opinion: I state that photographer mainly in weddings and events, then the light optics are obligatory, the lack of stabilization is not felt in these areas since it is not necessary to freeze the action, maybe for landscapes and similar stuff would have done Comfortable but also you use the tripod. The brightness of this 16-35mm makes it perfect for reportage, a stop in more brightness than the F/4 version means that in low light you have a stop in less than ISO getting cleaner photos, then the rendering of this optic with its colors and Contrast make it a perfect lens for its kind. It is not a cheap and very light lens, it is a professional lens of the L series, therefore the top. For amateurs I recommend the F/4 version much cheaper and with almost equal overall yield plus has the stabilization that can help in certain circumstances, for professionals or advanced amateurs who work at the professional level then this is the lens that makes For you. I didn't get to try the previous version so I can't give opinions about it. I hope this my opinion has been of help, a cordial greeting greeting and good light to all!!! ;)

avatarsenior
sent on June 21, 2018

Pros: Brightness, edge yield, build quality

Cons: Price, lack is, size

Opinion: I had the F4 16-35 and last year I switched to the F 2.8 mainly for a speech of brightness (using it a lot, as well as for landscapes, even for photos of reportage and weddings for which the more brightness made me comfortable as well as throat), but if you click Mostly landscape photos I definitely recommend the F4 version. I have not done tests nor ever made and I am interested, but after 3 years of F4 and 1 of f 2.8 III I can say that at the level of sharpness between the two I have not noticed a big difference, indeed.. Surely at F11 I do not think they are recognizable photos made with one or the other lens. Having said that that extra brightness, especially in certain photographic areas, can be really worth it. On the other hand, considering that the f 2.8 costs exactly twice the F4, besides the fact that it weighs more, is more cumbersome and loses the IS, rate really if it agrees this optical or the F4 version, but surely I do not think that the differences are worth twice the Price, which I consider still too high. (I must say that I was amazed at the fact that today there is only a review of this lens, which is probably the best wide angle of the Canon house, there will be some reason...? boh)

Photos taken with Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM

Foto
Gelada
by Marco Gaiotti
172 comments, 20448 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Autumn sunsets
by Marco Gaiotti
160 comments, 5819 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Suspended between peaks
by Marco Gaiotti
84 comments, 8292 views  [editors pick]
Foto
"Dragon Eggs"
by Roksolyana Hilevych
183 comments, 8033 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Return to Home
by Luisa60
136 comments, 10692 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 4.2 MP

Foto
“White chrome”
by Roksolyana Hilevych
32 comments, 3210 views  [editors pick]


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
All lined up on the Kussharo
by Marco Gaiotti
61 comments, 4725 views
Foto
Arctic summer
by Marco Gaiotti
32 comments, 1809 views
Foto
Sumatra oranges, wild specimen
by Marco Gaiotti
41 comments, 4384 views
Foto
Elena
by Elfiche
155 comments, 5801 views  
HI RES 9.8 MP

Foto
Lighthouse de la Entallada
by Elfiche
170 comments, 2866 views  
HI RES 27.5 MP

Foto
Gelada after the thunderstorm
by Marco Gaiotti
36 comments, 2795 views
Foto
Great Buddha
by Marco Tagliarino
39 comments, 2698 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 4.2 MP

Foto
Northen Light in Senja
by Luisa60
63 comments, 6785 views
Foto
My Iceland
by Gianni Zanella
53 comments, 5494 views
Foto
Sumatran orangutan
by Marco Gaiotti
28 comments, 3823 views
Foto
Let the light be.............
by Elfiche
181 comments, 2265 views  
HI RES 24.9 MP

Foto
Sunset in Bruneck
by Nicolò Vedele
42 comments, 2891 views
Foto
Love
by Elfiche
132 comments, 1748 views  
HI RES 14.1 MP

Foto
Julia and the curves of the fountain
by Elfiche
164 comments, 3951 views  
HI RES 13.1 MP

Foto
The Charisma
by Elfiche
187 comments, 2394 views  
HI RES 6.6 MP

Foto
Misty peaks
by Marco Gaiotti
34 comments, 1974 views
Foto
Who am I? What are they?
by Elfiche
153 comments, 1844 views  
HI RES 24.4 MP

Foto
The Far West? NO It's FUERTEVENTURA 2
by Elfiche
151 comments, 1558 views  
HI RES 23.5 MP

Foto
The last stars
by Marco Gaiotti
27 comments, 2644 views
Foto
Sunrise in Fuerteventura
by Elfiche
174 comments, 2137 views  
HI RES 28.9 MP

Foto
Lake Fausse Pointe, New
by Marco Gaiotti
27 comments, 1227 views
Foto
"Fire lily"
by Roksolyana Hilevych
31 comments, 1558 views
Foto
Flowering in the desert
by Marco Gaiotti
37 comments, 2138 views
Foto
Common Owl-Long eared Owl
by Fabrizio Moglia
35 comments, 2253 views
Foto
The Dome of the Rock - Jerusalem
by Elfiche
147 comments, 1984 views  
HI RES 23.6 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
THE FAR WEST? NO It's FUERTEVENTURA
by Elfiche
150 comments, 1908 views  
HI RES 30.1 MP

Foto
Playing pool among the northern montains
by Marco Tagliarino
38 comments, 1225 views  
HI RES 4.2 MP

Foto
Appearances are deceiving
by Federico Delucchi
27 comments, 3248 views  
HI RES 50.3 MP

Foto
Alessia
by Elfiche
145 comments, 1929 views
Foto
Scottish beach
by Marco Gaiotti
19 comments, 1294 views
Foto
A prayer for Paola Tim and all of us from Juza
by Elfiche
133 comments, 1832 views  
HI RES 14.7 MP


Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me