RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

If you want, you can even enable or disable specific cookies on the page Cookies Preferences.

OK, I confirm

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM : Specifications and Opinions




Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM



The Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2016. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2091 €;
24 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos





 Specifications
 Focal lenght   16-35 mm
 Angle of view   107.1 - 63.5°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/2.8
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   16 elements in 11 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.28 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.25x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, interal
 Stabilization   No
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   82 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   790 g
 Dimensions   88 x 127 mm

 Buy

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM , buy on Ebay Ebay



Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 213000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





avatarjunior
sent on December 26, 2016

Pros: Image quality: Sharpness + Colors + Contrast + micro contrast; F 2.8: low light + astro-photography

Cons: Weight and SIZE and maybe price

Opinion: Nothing is complete, Best image quality I've seen + one of the biggest wide lenses I've seen. Overall I am happy with the results, even sharper than 16-35 F4L IS!!But the SIZE and maybe the price makes it a hard choice for most. However, I do really wonder why there is not any 15mm, 16mm, 17mm, 18mm small prime lens from canon! 14mm is too wide for my taste and 20mm is not as wide as I want; a 4mm of FL range but an extensive difference. for now I am going to stick to the Zeiss 18mm f3.5 which is wide, and small.

Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on September 29, 2018

Pros: sharpness, brightness, edge yield, contrast and micro contrast, tropicalization, sturdiness, high build quality.

Cons: Price

Opinion: Before him I had the EF 16-35mm f/4l IS USM and later the Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD. This Canon is superior to both without a shadow of a doubt. In my personal ranking is positioned at the top staccato little from the Tamron while farther you place the 16-35 F/4 that Pecca, compared to the first two of less sharpness. Nothing dramatic, but the Tamron and the 16-35 f/2.8 III are really very sharp. The difference between the two is that the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM is always sharp, from 16 to 35, from the center to the edges and even at full aperture. The Tamron does not have sharp edges like the Canon and from 22-24 onwards it deteriorates altogether its performance. In short, this lens is fabulous, it returns you some files that look alive, three-dimensional, with a total yield impossible for the excellent Tamron pur (which I repeat to be an excellent lens) and with an embarrassing sharpness. Rightly the question that is often addressed is whether it is compared to brother F/4 since it costs twice as much. Is this price difference really worth it? For me yes, especially if you have a camera with many pixels that enhance this lens.

avatarjunior
sent on June 30, 2018

Pros: Sharpness | F/2.8 | L Series | Colors | Contrast | tropicalization | Build quality.

Cons: None worthy of note.

Opinion: I state that photographer mainly in weddings and events, then the light optics are obligatory, the lack of stabilization is not felt in these areas since it is not necessary to freeze the action, maybe for landscapes and similar stuff would have done Comfortable but also you use the tripod. The brightness of this 16-35mm makes it perfect for reportage, a stop in more brightness than the F/4 version means that in low light you have a stop in less than ISO getting cleaner photos, then the rendering of this optic with its colors and Contrast make it a perfect lens for its kind. It is not a cheap and very light lens, it is a professional lens of the L series, therefore the top. For amateurs I recommend the F/4 version much cheaper and with almost equal overall yield plus has the stabilization that can help in certain circumstances, for professionals or advanced amateurs who work at the professional level then this is the lens that makes For you. I didn't get to try the previous version so I can't give opinions about it. I hope this my opinion has been of help, a cordial greeting greeting and good light to all!!! ;)

avatarsenior
sent on June 21, 2018

Pros: Brightness, edge yield, build quality

Cons: Price, lack is, size

Opinion: I had the F4 16-35 and last year I switched to the F 2.8 mainly for a speech of brightness (using it a lot, as well as for landscapes, even for photos of reportage and weddings for which the more brightness made me comfortable as well as throat), but if you click Mostly landscape photos I definitely recommend the F4 version. I have not done tests nor ever made and I am interested, but after 3 years of F4 and 1 of f 2.8 III I can say that at the level of sharpness between the two I have not noticed a big difference, indeed.. Surely at F11 I do not think they are recognizable photos made with one or the other lens. Having said that that extra brightness, especially in certain photographic areas, can be really worth it. On the other hand, considering that the f 2.8 costs exactly twice the F4, besides the fact that it weighs more, is more cumbersome and loses the IS, rate really if it agrees this optical or the F4 version, but surely I do not think that the differences are worth twice the Price, which I consider still too high. (I must say that I was amazed at the fact that today there is only a review of this lens, which is probably the best wide angle of the Canon house, there will be some reason...? boh)

Photos taken with Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM

Foto
"Dragon Eggs"
by Roksolyana Hilevych
185 comments, 9366 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Return to Home
by Luisa60
138 comments, 11370 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 4.2 MP

Foto
“White chrome”
by Roksolyana Hilevych
33 comments, 3792 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Elena
by Elfiche
170 comments, 8004 views  
HI RES 9.8 MP

Foto
My Iceland
by Gianni Zanella
55 comments, 6973 views
Foto
" The Young Sculptor of Sappada "
by Tiber
59 comments, 3649 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 22.7 MP

Foto
Lighthouse de la Entallada
by Elfiche
186 comments, 3885 views  
HI RES 27.5 MP

Foto
Great Buddha
by Marco Tagliarino
39 comments, 3225 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 4.2 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Northen Light in Senja
by Luisa60
63 comments, 7184 views
Foto
Let the light be.............
by Elfiche
189 comments, 3171 views  
HI RES 24.9 MP

Foto
Sunset in Bruneck
by Nicolò Vedele
42 comments, 3722 views
Foto
Love
by Elfiche
142 comments, 2283 views  
HI RES 14.1 MP

Foto
Julia and the curves of the fountain
by Elfiche
164 comments, 4600 views  
HI RES 13.1 MP

Foto
The Charisma
by Elfiche
191 comments, 2972 views  
HI RES 6.6 MP

Foto
"Fire lily"
by Roksolyana Hilevych
31 comments, 2275 views
Foto
Who am I? What are they?
by Elfiche
167 comments, 2336 views  
HI RES 24.4 MP

Foto
The Far West? NO It's FUERTEVENTURA 2
by Elfiche
174 comments, 2273 views  
HI RES 23.5 MP

Foto
Sunrise in Fuerteventura
by Elfiche
178 comments, 2699 views  
HI RES 28.9 MP

Foto
Common Owl-Long eared Owl
by Fabrizio Moglia
35 comments, 2777 views
Foto
THE FAR WEST? NO It's FUERTEVENTURA
by Elfiche
155 comments, 2322 views  
HI RES 30.1 MP

Foto
The Dome of the Rock - Jerusalem
by Elfiche
149 comments, 2547 views  
HI RES 23.6 MP

Foto
Lauren
by Peppe Cancellieri
99 comments, 1990 views  
HI RES 18.6 MP

Foto
Alessia
by Elfiche
165 comments, 2784 views
Foto
Appearances are deceiving
by Federico Delucchi
27 comments, 3568 views  
HI RES 50.3 MP

Foto
A prayer for Paola Tim and all of us from Juza
by Elfiche
137 comments, 2132 views  
HI RES 14.7 MP

Foto
Aurora lagoon
by Luisa60
49 comments, 4361 views
Foto
"Ice Flower"
by Roksolyana Hilevych
32 comments, 2282 views
Foto
Sexy Bride
by Alessandro Colle
21 comments, 6492 views
Foto
Lights and Shadows on Genoa
by Elfiche
188 comments, 2647 views  
HI RES 18.5 MP

Foto
Happy Christmas Wishes
by Elfiche
221 comments, 3040 views  
HI RES 8.8 MP

Foto
Colors of the Tovel
by Nicola Valsecchi
44 comments, 1056 views
Foto
Flowers
by Lucas88
14 comments, 2346 views  [editors pick]


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Bled
by Federico Antonello
29 comments, 1153 views
Foto
Fly Alessia flies- On the St. Charles Bridge in Prague
by Elfiche
130 comments, 2004 views  
HI RES 15.3 MP

Foto
Hamnoy, classic view
by Nicola Valsecchi
40 comments, 1392 views
Foto
"Halo of Gold"
by Roksolyana Hilevych
34 comments, 1222 views
Foto
"Spring Awakening"
by Roksolyana Hilevych
29 comments, 1476 views

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me