|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Karl C www.juzaphoto.com/p/KarlC  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: A lot Cons: Little Opinion: I don't understand the criticisms of this excellent lens. The smooth is not even remotely comparable, let alone in low light conditions. There are also those who prefer the version F/4 and the thing, weight apart, amazes me. The F/4 never achieves its result. Version II is higher for AF speed. On the central sharpness are practically identical, on the edges it maintains more the II but nothing dramatic. The colors are a bit warmer on the version I but more contraended on the II. Compare the images in post to believe. The real problem is that Canon does not provide assistance on products no longer in production for seven years. Which also does not concern only this optics and which is not from Canon. sent on November 13, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: Sharpest. Colors. Layout of floors. Great construction. Cons: Nothing at all. Opinion: The 24/70 par excellence. The stabilizer I think is completely useless on this type of lens. It is crisp on all the frame, the colors are superb. It offers a beautiful blur and is handy and portable. It offers some good features such as lock function. It smells great and has a very good floor plan. If you want to find a defect is expensive but at the moment there is no competition. sent on July 09, 2017 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Very sharp. Very beautiful colors. Excellent value for money. Cons: On shadows and dark tends to the magenta Opinion: Great optics. Very sharp. The bokeh is remarkable, in my opinion a bit hard. Stack of really good plans. As already mentioned on shadows and dark tends to magenta. In PP sometimes it is easy to remedy if it is a catalog less on a sunset. Fast and accurate AF. The colors are always full and full of colors. Very beautiful. A level look that you can put in with a small expense. The weight is reasonable considering the quality of the lens. sent on July 07, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: Super sharpness. Fantastic Bokeh. AF lightning. Fantastic colors and poetic set. Cons: Nobody. Opinion: It's a great lens. Very sharp even at TA. Never experienced any problems in this regard. His bokeh has no equal. It's pure poetry. The chromatic rendering is superb. It works well in any light condition and not just for portrait. An absolutely lightning strike makes it very versatile. In my opinion, it is not just about working on 1.2. It is also superb closing. In short, it can not be argued and the files that make me confirm it every time. A 1.2 manages to interpret reality as only he can do. RnCerto is not economical but all the rest that is in production does not reach its magic. Lens to be absolutely. sent on July 06, 2017 |
 | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Scary sharpness. Full and natural colors. Great bokeh. Solid construction and beautiful aesthetics. Cons: Heavy. It's not Canon 1.2 Opinion: Great optics. You can work if you want soft backgrounds as if you want sharpness across the picture. It goes very close to the subject. Chromatic rendering is poetry and has a good variety of uses. Of course it is heavy and not easy to ride but qualitatively can not be discussed. The bokeh is great, creamy, sometimes poetic and perfect. Sigma is working well on the Art series. I insist on the chromatic rendering of all the Art I've tried. It's not just clarity it's also saturation quality with full but natural chromium. sent on June 17, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
