|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Franco Santi www.juzaphoto.com/p/FrancoSanti  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon F-1 Pros: Extremely serious and intelligent modular design that allows to intervene with ease on the faults, however very rare. Excellent materials and proof of false manoeuvres, screws, threads that are hardly spanned and in short, done well! . Possibility of double and over shows in perfect alignment, field framed in the viewfinder 100%, possibility of framing with cockpit etc. and finally a flood of accessories. Cons: Weight, though...... A certain tendency to dirty the retarder of slow times, 1 "-1 \ \ 2" Currently you have to intervene (little thing) on the power of the light meter having changed the voltage of the current batteries (without mercury) but this is the fault of the batteries. At Mercury was 1.35 v now 1.5. Opinion: I own a body from 1973, it works well, it never made me trouble. If you went to the Amazon, and you had it, you should take it as the only choice!!! Maximum reliability with high temperatures and humidity levels, maximum resistance to falls and ill-treatment. I don't think she owns plastic parts. If the pictures will not be beautiful pictures, believe me, it will not be the fault of the CANON F1 OLD, it will be our fault. sent on February 04, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: good sharpness, speed of action Cons: nothing special except the bulk, but it is so, unfortunately it is not foldable. Opinion: I've been trying for a long time even 2.8, but I honestly prefer the less bright. It is much more precise and incisive. One of my colleague sold me to buy 2.8 instead! However, it is a good optic, but it does not hurt the previous one. Of course, I keep it tight, and even though I use it with a limited frequency, it has technically given me some great satisfaction.rn sent on October 01, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM II Pros: Very convenient in maneuvers, good handle, more than good sharpness, covers almost every need. Cons: If positioned at 24mm, by shoulder strap, tends to move to 105 mm by increasing the bulk, probably the weight exceeds the friction of the screw. I hope the "flex" for this extra work will not be used and will break before the expected. For now I have repaired with an elastic brake. The shoulder strap could be improved by increasing the "grip" on the shoulder. (Sic) Opinion: An "honest" lens that does his job well. The price is in line with the quality offered. Undoubtedly if the lens's incisiveness was that of the old canon fd 100 mm f2 it would be excellent. But not always the high incisiveness is a good thing. For prints on paper up to 20x30 between a Leica elmarit and a canon 24-105 there is no difference. Perhaps canon seems even more engraved. With prints over 50x60 Leica says the law with its "plasticity". Yes, I know it is only adjectives, but the difference is visible. You must have STAMPARE.rn sent on July 25, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
