|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marchetto1972 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Marchetto1972 ![]() |
![]() | Ricoh GR Digital IV Pros: Compact, great depth of field, perfect for reportage. Cons: High price of both new when you go out and used. Opinion: The ricoh gr iv is perfect for reportage, more you can not ask, it has an exceptional level of customization for size, all functions can be reached with few operations. In my opinion, the small sensor should not be seen as a flaw in the reportage where it is generally triggered at closed focal points to increase the depth of field. This is not necessary because the depth is guaranteed by the small sensor and the F1.9 brightness allows you to keep ISO low to contain the noise. Ricoh focused on the APSC for market reasons but could have developed the machine perhaps by inserting a 1/1.7" foveon and would have centered as the quality and workable of black and white. Too bad he didn't. However, Ricoh remains the best reporting machine. sent on March 12, 2021 |
![]() | Nikon Z50 Pros: Compactness, grip, iso hold, file workability, autofocus. Cons: Lack of native lenses in dx format!! Nikon give us at least a fixed 18mm and a 23mm. Opinion: The machine itself is perfect even considering the cost. It has everything you need for an even evolved photoamateur. But Nikon has to hurry to produce native dx optics, in my way I see buying a small and relatively cheap body and then mounting the larger and very expensive full frame Z lenses makes no sense. Even less to put the F optics in it unless already in possession. But they must try to sell to new potential customers not only keep the old. They must at least market a 24/70 (equivalent FF) f2.8 and a pair of fixed 28mm and 35mm native only der bodies Z dx, always focusing on compactness then f2 massino. Hello everyone sent on December 31, 2019 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me