|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Spiritolibero83 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Spiritolibero83  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 20mm f/1.8 G ED Pros: compactness, weight, sharpness, brightness, aesthetics, screw filters... etc... Cons: Not stabilized nor (seriously) sealed Opinion: A fixed of this focal I think is not very usual and yet has its why. It will not be built with "premium" materials but it is sufficiently solid as well as aesthetically pleasing, with a good lens hood and light almost not to be heard despite the great luminosity. Strong point, a bit like all fixed, sharpness. Comfortable the possibility of mounting screw filters (I would say a rarity on wide) and beautiful colors for excellent photos of landscape. The stabilizer would also give a hand on these focal lengths since, Freehand, at some point the blur comes. Nice on APS-C because it becomes a 30mm to be used even more frequently. It is not sealed except for a gasket on the bayonet. In any way not bad... sent on May 15, 2018 |
 | Tamron SP 35mm f/1.8 Di VC USD Pros: Construction, compactness, solidity, image quality, stabilization, tropicalization... etc... Cons: Some chromatic aberration at very open apertures. Opinion: Bought a few months after having previously excluded the two Nikkor (the F 1.8 because objectively poorer and the F 1.4 because frighteningly expensive without being so much better) after a quick runoff with Sigma Art. F 1.4. The latter, perhaps better with regard to sharpness and even nicer aesthetically, cost something more by offering something less (see stabilization). Of the Tamron I can only speak well, I like it! Nice solid but not too heavy and cumbersome, hyper effective stabilization so much to get almost 1/4s freehand, sharp (although a little less than the Sigma from this point of view having the stabilizer sometimes makes a difference as well on these focal lengths) , resistance to flare excellent with unique neo of chromatic aberrations at very very open apertures... Recommended! sent on May 14, 2018 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: Versatility, sturdiness, adequate size, reasonable price... Cons: A little something but nothing tragic... Opinion: Bought a few days to replace the albeit acceptable AF-P 18/55 found in kits with the Nikon D5500 after a long runoff with the Nikkor 16/80 (really too expensive to be just DX). The first sensation is that of a "more photographer" instrument than that of the kit with nice dimensions, weight and aesthetics. Although I have not yet tried to the end I must say I have not regretted the purchase, indeed... has a good sharpness, beautiful colors certainly not turned off, an adequate focal length thanks to which it shows a good "handyman" and a dignified opening of the Diaphragm (f 2.8/4) sufficient for daily use. Well after the merits touches the flaws... I noticed a certain difficulty in focusing in low light, some chromatic aberration, a bit of flare in addition to the possibility that the lens extends alone towards the maximum focal (for honesty I have to Say that holding the machine around the neck while moving I have not noticed big problems but if you put it upside down and you shake it a little is not so "stopped"). I had read a few comments strongly negative about the distortion especially at 17 mm but, maybe because I still have not squeezed too much, I have not detected any particular flaws... Anyway if you want something compact, from the discrete potential and that does not cost a salary I can only recommend this Sigma 17/70 Contemporary... with good peace of my original lightning strike (Nikkor 16/80) not so much better according to the tests of Lenstip... sent on June 19, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
