|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marcello Lepore www.juzaphoto.com/p/MarcelloLepore ![]() |
![]() | Sony E 70-350mm f/4.5-6.3 G OSS Pros: Lightness and bulkiness Cons: Slow autofocus also on Sony (Nex 7), not very suitable for avifauna in flight. Sharpness at high focal lengths not as I expected reading the reviews Opinion: I was expecting, having read the reviews, something more :( Compared to the vintage lenses I use from 3/400mm (450/600 mm.eq) it is certainly faster in use. However, it is not superior in image definition, (with the same focal length and in optimal shooting conditions) with the Noflexar 400 or the Pentacon 300. sent on August 19, 2021 |
![]() | Sony E 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 OSS Pros: Beautiful, light, well finished, good good stabilizer and autofocus. Cons: The maximum brightness in use canvases and 'too low. It would be better to do a little 'more' wide and heavy but more 'light :(. The image definition is not' particularly good. Towards the focal more 'lost in high definition and contrast. Opinion: I was very disappointed because 'from Sony I expected a lot more' :( .rnE 'a nice little toy, (obligated .... because of the scarcity' of optical human price to Sony offers for Emount :(), but absolutely not live up to 24 megapixel sensor of my Nex 7.rnSe exclude ease of use, (being autofocus and stabilized it is much appreciated in practical use), it is "torn" markedly from optics 30/40 years ago in the definition and brightness (Canon FD 100-300mm f5.6 MF - Jupiter 21M MF 200mm f4 -Canon 200mm f4 MF - Tamron 300mm f5.6 MF) .rnFotografando people over 20mt..avifauna esempio..ed for having the need to crop a little 'trouble starts,' cause the subject loses a lot in definizione.rnConsiglierei other optical, but the problem dell'Emount and 'that there' a great alternative to optical Sony (however few) if you He wants optics autofocus and stabilized .... ahime'.rnrnrn sent on March 01, 2017 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me