|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Sandro Longhi www.juzaphoto.com/p/SandroLonghi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Sharpness from 2.8 up to 13 fantastic - precise autofocus - Light and obviously comfortable - pleasing blur Cons: Sharpness at TA - with no significant differences lower model Opinion: 9 has improved the reasons to keep this lens is not as striking, but it is clear that they are and remain subjective views sent on January 08, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: Sharp at all apertures - of course very light and comfortable - the used price - accurate autofocus - very beautiful colors Cons: Maybe a little 'flare but at this price ... Opinion: It states that at the time of writing this is by far, since the days of analogue, my first and only fixed lens. By various test types I've done, I can only be satisfied with the results, which will be fixed are optimized for focal specifications for which they are built, but comparing it with various objectives (zoom) I have at home on some shots taken at the same focal, I would say that if the plays and is even superior to almost triple price lens (say that it was granted?) so much that I'm considering to buy another fixed alternative to a 24-70. The best results I got them in the landscapes and the still life for now only at the test level, the sharpness turned out to be excellent at all apertures, giving me precise and saturated shots with a nice bokeh in the lower ones, I personally have not noticed problems vignetting it another, perhaps the only drawback that must be taken is the flare, a lens hood is a must also alternative to the original rather ish. A will, which is also stabilizedwe want more? sent on November 30, 2016 |
 | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: absolute clarity - alive, saturated color - bright - Price Cons: a minimum of distortion and vignetting to the lower focal but at this price ... Opinion: Among the dozen goals I have tried on my old Canon EOS 500 D this lens in terms of sharpness and precision is inferior only to the excellent paintings Canon 70-200 F / 4.0 L USM that was going to cover the whole upper focal, has to be great, especially in light conditions not excellent considering it is a 2.8 and has an excellent stabilizer, but I also got wonderful shots with portraits and landscapes, also has the standard hood, perhaps the only ones in are noted at 17 mm where shines a slight vignetting and minimal distortion, but its most serious defect is that it's not compatible with FF and I'm selling a great reluctance sent on November 10, 2016 |
 | Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Pros: price / performance ratio - combines several functions - it may surprise you if used in the right conditions Cons: embarrassing autofocus - dark - unsuitable for shots that require alertness Opinion: I received a gift that goal when I was still the owner of my first APS-C, I state immediately that take confidence has not been easy, especially in the use of light conditions are not good but he was immediately very difficult, it exaggerated difficult to start slowly focus so much that I thought to a production error, so I began to try it in broad daylight, and things changed dramatically, in addition to being a decent telephoto in macro mode this lens gave me quite a few satisfactions making me closer to this kind hitherto unknown, the obvious overall yield in terms of chromatic correct sharpness and anything else is not record but with a "cleaned up" in phase of PP the results become more than acceptable. Also I discover only now that the goal is compatible with FF, on my current Canon EOS 5D Mark II things further improves so much that I decided to hold it and to this day, always with the lighting conditions and with a little ' patience to find the giusta distance and angle put in focus, is giving me remarkable shots especially in macro mode even at room temperature with a pleasant blur, and considering the price within the reach of every budget the final results are no less to be considered sent on November 10, 2016 |
 | Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM Pros: Very noticeable field angle, chromatic fairness, sharpness Cons: Vignetting, no sharp edges on the sides, only accepts specific and expensive filters Opinion: My first true wide-angle, I have to say that I had a lot of difficulty using it correctly at the beginning but this is certainly not a goal for those who have just approached photography unless they are content to stop a wide landscape, looking for unusual and unusual perspectives Experimenting several times from different angles this lens offers truly original images and in some cases exhilarating especially at 8 mm. Good sharpness even though on the sides you notice a slight vignetting and a defeat definition that does not compromise however much the final result, I wanted to try it with a polarizer but the lens unfortunately does not accept filters unless some dedicated and very expensive models sent on September 13, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Lightning-fast autofocus, excellent sharpness, very good price-performance ratio Cons: On some occasions you would like stabilized during the long hike is (obviously) taking hold Opinion: I was lucky enough to find this wonderful lens used in mint condition, it was enough to mount it on my EOS 500D and focus on any object to realize that I was holding a quality tool, then giving a glance at the PC to those few shots taken I did not think for a moment more, I have to say that even a body of low-end machine like the 500D with this telephoto makes a quantum leap, and can give images that leave you amazed sharpness and correct color depth a pleasant blur, really remarkable with close-ups. It must say that in light conditions which are no more than good use becomes more challenging and camera shake is lurking, although it is also not a "heavyweight" one morning I've trucked approximately 2 km along a river to "hunt" of herons and I can assure you that hold long strap becomes really uncomfortable. But unless we switch to something morehighborn now very unlikely I could do without this lens that has given me and continue to give me great satisfaction sent on September 13, 2016 |
 | Canon 500D Pros: Great entry level, very valid for daytime photo, with the right goals can dazzle, price Cons: noisy even at low ISO, economic construction but at this price ... Opinion: The sad analogue regression and not exactly brilliant start of the digital I walked away from our passion, when the technology started to churn out cars by the results satisfactory and decided to go back to take the purchase was oriented in what is (in 2011) it was I think the best low-end machine Canon house, among other things purchased with substantial discount and to this day when I'm evaluating a body of quite another category I can only be satisfied with the results and the experience gained with the same. It has obvious flaws and are immediately noticeable, we can not expect an example of speed and accuracy with autofocus but the most obvious flaw emerges with night photos, really too noisy, in some cases a certain grain is known already at ISO 400, but remains a machine that when used with the objectives the settings and the right conditions can give results well above of what we expect in this market segment. sent on September 10, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
