|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Curad www.juzaphoto.com/p/Curad  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 24mm f/3.5 DG DN C Pros: Manufacturing, optical rendering Cons: At the moment no cons as surrender. The magnetic lens cover, with the lens hood in the position of use, does not come off even if my daughter who has sloth nails tries to. Opinion: After a period of reflection I came to the final choice of the 24mm, and I opted for this lens. In my brain ranking the Voigtlander E 21mm f/3.5 Color-Skopar Aspherical stood out, but due to physical problems I need an AF lens. I looked at a few images on the internet produced by Sony bodies with 24mm of various brands and I read everything and more, the Voigt remains, for me, the most similar to my eyes, so I should have switched to a 20mm of another brand, but why do it? That is, it's like wanting a four-seater sofa that you've seen and it's beautiful and very comfortable but it costs more than you can afford and there's a very similar three-seater that you like almost as much and that you can afford, you won't look for another four-seater, because with the others there's no history, So get a three-seater that will then surprisingly satisfy you 100%. To remain light and with little bulk I gave up the 0.66 compared to the f2.8 lenses even if Sony produces a very small one, but from what I saw it did not give me the same emotion as the Voigt, which instead dares to do almost the same as the Sigma. So I plugged in the lens and started shooting in B/W, because I like it so much, but with wide Raw, I discovered a formidable lens, with beautiful and many grayscales and thanks to the sensor (A7r III) you can recover any. What more do I have to tell you, I have been photographing for about 45 years and the feeling that this 24mm gives me is of pure fun and pleasure, no muddled horizons, no abnormal distortions, the electronics take care of correcting very well both in camera and in post, if I have to go up from 100 to 200 iso, I don't worry even for a second, PDC Limited? Yes but only in comparisons with f1.4-1.8, plus it has a minimum focus of 10/12 cm, I don't remember, and this allows for a blur, of course, greater if you get closer to what you want to photograph. sent on May 08, 2025 |
 | Nikon D3x Pros: Reliable, do what you want. Cons: Comparing it to modern reflexes or ml, it would have dozens, but it would be a nonsensical comparison. Opinion: Good morning, I've owned this car for a year. I find it perfect for me, yes the weight is relevant but comparable to a D850 with bg. So, the D3x is a machine that I find fun to use, it's my first ever flagship, and I have no previous comparisons to do either as a body or as an mpx, my previous ones were at most 16 mpx in apsc or 12 mpx format in ff format, so what this machine gives me back, for me is fantastic. It has all the controls ready, it's quick to do what you set it to do, yes yes the burst at maximum raw resolution is a sloth, but in the studio with flashes is sufficiete. There are so many admirers of this camera and I understand them. Compared to modern machine bodies, it lacks many things, be it physical, the joistick for focus points, the non-tilting monitor, stabilizer on the sensor, as for software, does not chase the eyes, does not have Focus Stacking, does not get to 102,000 iso and many other things. But for what she owns is a machine lady, the end result, which is what we should all aim for, to me satisfies 100%. I mainly do studio photos, easel use or monopod because holding it for several hours I fatigue and then tremble, which does not happen to me with the Fuji X T1, but it is another speech. I use it with the 50mm 1.8 G, the 85mm 1.8 G and the 24-120 4 G, the latter almost never in the studio. I love the b/n and if imodifyed with this age-changemachine comes out something remarkable like this (https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&t=3199113). I am very satisfied but it is not said that I will not switch to a lighter body that can give me the same type of file, but if it must be an ml, that it is really light, otherwise I keep the D3x sent on July 10, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
