|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Dav www.juzaphoto.com/p/Dav  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D7100 Pros: Body (IDENTICAL to D610) - sensor - raw file workable - construction - weight - good seal ISO Cons: Buffer that does not take much when you shots in RAW (problem on D600) Opinion: after 80,000 shots with a Nikon FF always, the D600, I decided after luuuunghissime reflections to take a step back and retrace DX sensors to leverage their multiplication factor. I will then brief comparison based on my experience from semi-pro photographer (wedding and still life) between the two machines and basically between the two sensors: that's it ... the only real difference I found in favor of more expensive D600 is held at high ISO. For the rest, two identical machines !!! great body resistant, comfortable controls, customizable buttons, dual slot x SD (ottimoooo) !! Really an exceptional car the D7100 !! When I speak of sealing at high ISO, I mean above 2500 as ISO sensitivity up to lower you will notice the difference only croppando. personally I never go beyond this threshold, because the pictures taken at ISO 12,000 sonon unusable for me as well if taken with a D4! rnrnvi advice then to properly evaluate whether to spend 600-700 euro for a FF when you have available theor the same body and the same excellent quality with the D7100 and a DX sensor that lets you zoom in and you can save even more on optical (FF ones cost more!). sent on March 09, 2015 |
 | Sony NEX 3N Pros: Pocket! - Sensor - Price - Retail - yield at high iso - compact - some functions just like the pros but beautiful panorama function - Adjustable screen Cons: Maf a bit 'slow and inaccurate - screen colors oversaturated Opinion: Introduction: I was looking for a second car to be attached to my Nikon Full Frame for those occasions when you can not take 5 kg between optical and body and not to miss even one shot. after a long search (fuji x20 - Sony RX100) I ended up on the Sony NEX 3n (costs much less than the other two mentioned before and has a sensor twice the size) and I must say that fully meets my needs! Produces RAW files lavorabilissimi, it costs very little (located at 260 eurooooooo!!) ??Fits into my pocket so I can take her when I go skiing or when they are on a bike or on the beach! Also, I'm not ripiangere left my camera at home and allow me to photograph opportunities that otherwise I would have lost a good quality and a good seal to the other iso (used also in 3200!). It 's almost like having the quality of a canon 600d with 260 euro! RnrnLa highly recommend it, although it depends on the purpose for which you use it (do not think of being able to photograph distant sports action!) sent on May 13, 2014 |
 | Nikon D600 Pros: Pontentissimo sensor, buttons, almost perfect, light, rendered at high iso D4, handling, NEF high, double SD slot Cons: Hard to find .... maybe .... the menu too divided, and the autofocus points grouped in the center of the viewfinder Opinion: I come from a D300S and the transition to d600 has been highlighted the fantastic sensations: light (you can carry it all day and I miss you miss it!), File quality and impressive performance at high ISO like a D4! RNLA strength of D600 revolves around its FX sensor really full-bodied in dynamic range and quality of the files it generates. The raw files can be recovered easily 4 stop making useless double exposures in the photos paesaggistiche.rnrnHo tried to push to ISO 6400 and the noise you get to see, but be assured that below this threshold is imperceptible! With the D300S could not exceed 1000 iso and if I tried to over-expose as much of a raw pixels were splitting! With the D600 is quite feasible! rnQuoto who said to be a cave use in automatic (I think it's just a gimmick than Nikon). rnrnLa lightness makes it even more appealing, you can forget the weight of some higher-end backs! RNE 'really the solution for those seeking maximum picture quality at an affordable price (with respect to a D4/d800). rnrn sent on January 09, 2013 |
 | Nikon D300s Pros: Indestructible body, buttons, suitable for professional use, burst, af points, double slot Cons: low resistance to high iso, lack of infrared sensor for remote control Opinion: Machine really solid, battle, suitable for all conditions and weather situations. It is distinguished by the setting of the buttons can be used immediately for adjustments last second! Burst unbeatable opportunity to focus in 3D really useful! The real flaw, it is the ISO above 1000 .... I'm not going to have files manageable! If it were not for the noise ... it would be a car to keep for eternal life!! sent on September 25, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
