What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 05, 2014 (11:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very striking image with a perfect title ;-)
Hello Hello Salvo Immagine molto suggestiva con un titolo perfetto 
Ciao Ciao Salvo |
| sent on August 05, 2014 (11:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Salvo! Grazie Salvo! |
| sent on August 05, 2014 (15:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful moment of light, but cut to the right
crooked horizon, sky noisy
primoi on the floor you could do better
my 2Cents, f
bel momento di luce, ma tagliato a dx
orizzonte storto, cielo rumoroso
sul primoi piano si poteva fare di meglio
my 2cents, f
|
| sent on August 05, 2014 (15:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fracas Thanks for your comments, very helpful ... in fact I can not share ...
On the first floor do you mean, you could do better? Would you give me an opinion a little more detail?
In my view the fact of leaving the foreground in shadow so would have to direct attention primarily on the rays of light, so I did not give much importance to the first floor ... how did you played?
Thank you! Hello! Grazie Fracas per le tue osservazioni, molto utili...in effetti non posso che condividerle...
Sul primo piano cosa intendi con si poteva fare meglio? Mi daresti un giudizio un pò più dettagliato?
Nel mio intento il fatto di lasciare il primo piano così in ombra avrebbe dovuto indirizzare l'attenzione soprattutto sui raggi di luce, per cui non ho dato molta importanza al primo piano...tu come l'hai interpretata?
Grazie! Ciao! |
| sent on August 06, 2014 (12:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello,
- I mean that I would not have included the trees cut on the left, raising the camera or maybe pointing to the right +
- However, raising the camera would move down the line of the horizon with the advantage of devoting + part of the frame to the main subject, leaving the sea and headland to act as a context.
- Maybe I even left a bit of detail in the foreground in shadow: I personally see + deep black with a silhouette recognizable (a lighthouse, a tree, a person), but in this case a little (but just a little) detail could help
- + In addition to pointing to the right (as well as + above) could help not to cut the spokes on the right
I hope I was helpful
francis ciao,
- intendo che non avrei incluso gli alberelli tagliati sulla sx, alzando la fotocamera o magari puntando + a dx
- peraltro alzando la fotocamera si sarebbe spostata verso il basso la linea dell'orizzonte col vantaggio di dedicare + parte del fotogramma al soggetto principale, lasciando mare e promontorio a fare da contesto.
- forse avrei anche lasciato un filo di dettaglio nel primo piano in ombra: personalmente vedo + il nero profondo con una silhoutte ben riconoscibile (un faro, un albero, una persona), mentre in questo caso poco (ma proprio poco) dettaglio poteva aiutare
- in aggiunta puntando + a destra (oltre che + in alto) poteva aiutare a non tagliare i raggi sulla dx
spero di essere stato utile
francesco |
| sent on August 06, 2014 (13:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello,
certain that you have been helpful, thank you for giving me a more profound opinion (not often ;-)).
I understand better what you mean .. I actually did several shots with various shots but I do not remember why I put this right ... The point was that, if you want to include the full width of the area affected by the rays of the sea on the horizon, I had to stay with the shortest focal length with the result of having the main subject much smaller than the entire frame.
Hello! Ciao,
certo che sei stato utile, ti ringrazio per avermi dato un parere più approfondito (non capita spesso ).
Ho capito meglio cosa intendevi..in realtà ho fatto diversi scatti con varie inquadrature ma non ricordo perchè ho inserito proprio questa... Il punto era che, volendo includere tutta l'ampiezza della zona di mare colpita dai raggi all'orizzonte, avrei dovuto stare più corto con la focale con la conseguenza di avere il soggetto principale molto più piccolo nell'intero fotogramma.
Ciao! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
17.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
