This time I made it smaller (not my fault)

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Astrophotography

This time I made it smaller (not my fault)...

16.1 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

I miei scatti View gallery (17 photos)

This time I made it smaller (not my fault) sent on March 16, 2014 (22:50) by Calvi Renzo. 12 comments, 2849 views.

, 1/160 f/8.0, ISO 400, tripod.

La foto (scattata nello stesso posto di quella di giugno 2013,cioè da casa mia) risulta più piccola del 10% in quanto nove mesi fa il nostro satellite come già spiegato era al suo perigeo.

View High Resolution 16.1 MP

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Paolo Dessilani

sent on March 17, 2014 (10:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful studio and lots of patience. Beyond the controversy on the shot, I think is a great example of how sometimes if one engages you will achieve exceptional results. And anyway, a picture (in this case two), I take away all doubt "astronomical" on the possible size of our satellite cameras. :-)

Calvi Renzo

sent on March 17, 2014 (10:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Paolo trust and visit .....
Even last night and spent a few rare plane because in that direction (east) the routes are too shifted with respect to Malpensa airport, but as soon as I chance I will try to redo some shots lucky ..
Renzo

Fulvio Gioria

sent on March 17, 2014 (12:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Renzo Bravo! Good:-P ;-) ... though for my part I had no doubt about the veracity of the other photo ... wow!: Fconfuso: I see that you just took this (taking advantage of the full moon last night), you immediately took the ball to post this simple demonstration!
From the balcony of the new new apartment I also have this view, and the first time I noticed this glance I immediately thought of you! :-D:-D
But I have a 800 ... and then will do the same gray snap or one that looks even remotely! :-(
But feeling a little ', about the Tokina! If you did this shot with an aperture more "normal" what was the result? Also because I noticed that you used 400iso ... and if impostavi f11 or f16 with lower iso was not better? ... Or somethinghappening? wow! ;-)
A salutone! Hello! :-D ;-)

Calvi Renzo

sent on March 17, 2014 (22:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello dear, when I bought the Tokina believed that, as in most of the objectives, the optimum yield was in the intermediate diaphragms, but then one day by chance I tried all the diaphragms, and with surprise I discovered that af 32 the results were not the best slightly.
Do not ask me why, but I know that the data differ from lens to lens.
The proof of what I assert you can see in the photo of the White Horn and that taken at F32.
In addition to ISO 400 it seems to me that the results are very similar to ISO has more bass.
We trust that the tests I've done are very few and do not exclude that it can greatly improve the results.
Hello and good evening.
Renzo

Donna

sent on March 27, 2014 (22:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Interestingly, in addition to the photo itself, the magic of the moon, hello

Calvi Renzo

sent on March 27, 2014 (22:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You say interesting things ... sometimes technology makes us forget things too.
But at least not for me .... that I still believe in simplicity of our items.
Hello .. and thanks for the heartfelt comment.
Renzo ;-)

Andrea Paolini

sent on March 27, 2014 (23:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I have carefully read your photograph and your explanation .....
Congratulations!
Hello
Andrea

Calvi Renzo

sent on March 28, 2014 (9:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Andrea del sincere comment.
I'm not an expert amateur photographer but I like to capture unusual situations and try to understand the mode.
That's fluctuate on a monthly basis of the distance of the moon was a matter that did not know and just lately the passion for photography I was able to give.
Thanks for visiting.
Renzo

Giobanni

sent on September 09, 2014 (20:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I bet you're a fan of you too Margheritona! (Hack) Complimentoni
Gio

Calvi Renzo

sent on September 10, 2014 (0:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for the compliment ....... pl.
They are not, however, appassionatissimo were years that the moon passing behind the cross teased my deepest instincts photographers.
Hello Renzo

Lince

sent on September 24, 2014 (10:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Extraordinary document and made very well.
Congratulations to the technique and expertise.
Hello

Angel

Calvi Renzo

sent on September 24, 2014 (23:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Angelo,
technical expertise and do not know ...
I just try to explain how I shot the photos documenting a bit, especially as in this case, nor did I know of the fluctuating monthly distance earth / moon.
Anyway thanks for your visit.
Renzo

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.