What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 09, 2014 (20:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Inside ... even free hand. Compliments Inside ... even free hand. Compliments |
| sent on March 09, 2014 (21:42)
Thank you again Mcs. Hello |
| sent on March 11, 2014 (13:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Zman follow you .. you know .. a few years back atmosphere always beautiful .. if I would tell you that you've captured the Flower is a phalenopsis
Good light
Ciao Zman ..ti seguo da qualche anno ..sai restituire atmosfere sempre bellissime..se posso vorrei dirti che il Fiore che hai immortalato è una phalenopsis
Buona luce
|
| sent on March 11, 2014 (16:51)
Thank you Msilenu for your appreciation. Hello |
| sent on March 12, 2014 (17:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very beautiful! very beautiful! |
| sent on March 12, 2014 (17:42)
Thank you Diego for your nice comment. Hello |
| sent on March 12, 2014 (18:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I bet the focus in the central part, in the heart of the flower as well as yourself picture is confused and not very pleasing to the vision because, in my opinion, you have not highlighted the aspects that make it beautiful. The fact that the sides are in focus, in my opinion, does not make much sense as annoying as I find the inclusion of that piece of petal at the bottom right.
If you still have at your disposal the subject might do some other test ;-)
Of course mine is just a personal opinion .... and by the way the only critical with respect to all those who have preceded me.
The important thing, in the end, is that the photo you like and then from the right weight to my words. ;-)
Hello Zman! ;-)
Michela Avrei puntato la messa a fuoco nella parte centrale, nel cuore, del fiore che così come da te ritratto risulta confuso e poco piacevole alla visione perchè, secondo me, non hai messo in risalto gli aspetti che lo rendono bello. Il fatto che siano a fuoco le parti laterali, a mio parere, non ha molto senso così come trovo fastidiosa l'inclusione di quel pezzettino di petalo in basso a destra.
Se hai ancora a tua disposizione il soggetto potresti fare qualche altra prova
Naturalmente il mio è solo un parere personale....e tra l'altro l'unico critico rispetto a tutti coloro che mi hanno preceduta.
L'importante, alla fine, è che la foto piaccia a te e dunque dai il giusto peso alle mie parole.
Ciao Zman!
Michela |
| sent on March 12, 2014 (18:24)
Greetings Michela and thank you for your sincere opinion. As for me and what I wanted to show in this shot is the red lines that make a nice curve inside. I am not shooting a flower to show the sharpness . It is an abstract shot. I take your comment very dearly and I appreciate your opinion highly.
Hello |
| sent on March 12, 2014 (19:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ As for me and what I wanted to show in this shot is the red lines That Make a nice curves inside „
If this was your intention maybe you could get most of that particular sharpness with a smaller aperture.
To emphasize a particular sharpness is still needed on this ... I think you'll agree with me.
I also really love to play "artistically" in the macro and flowers with blurred but I do it just to concentrate, with selective focus on a particular one.
If you like this genre, let me advise the vision of the beautiful photos of Joseph Guadagno who knows how to combine technique and artistic expression in a wonderful way: I call it "the Master." :-D
Thank you very much for this exchange of views and for your willingness to discussI appreciate that very much.
Best wishes! :-P
Michela
PS: the flower you photographed is not an Iris but orchid species Phalaenopsis ;-) " As for me and what I wanted to show in this shot is the red lines that make a nice curve inside"
Se questa era la tua intenzione forse potevi ottenere maggior nitidezza di quel particolare con un diaframma più chiuso.
Per dare risalto ad un particolare la nitidezza resta comunque necessaria...penso che su questo tu possa essere d'accordo con me.
Anch'io amo molto giocare "artisticamente" nelle macro ai fiori e con lo sfocato ma lo faccio proprio per concentrarmi, con messa a fuoco selettiva, su un particolare.
Se ti piace questo genere, permettimi di consigliarti la visione delle splendide foto di Giuseppe Guadagno che sa unire espressività artistica e tecnica in modo meraviglioso: io lo chiamo "il Maestro".
Ti ringrazio molto per questo scambio di opinioni e per la tua disponibilità al confronto che apprezzo molto.
Cari saluti!
Michela
P.S.: il fiore che hai fotografato non è un Iris ma un'orchidea della specie Phalaenopsis |
| sent on March 13, 2014 (6:38)
Greetings Michela. This is the beauty of exchanging ideas. I always consider myself an amateur and a student and I agree with your opinion and thank you for your explanation. At my age I sometimes forget my wife's name and call her Honey and again I missed the name of the flower. Yes it is an orchid. Thank you. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
18.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
