What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 22, 2013 (15:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice indeed! Congratulations!
See you soon,
Nicholas Davvero molto bella! Complimenti!
A presto,
Nicolò |
| sent on November 22, 2013 (21:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice picture and subject bella foto e soggetto |
| sent on November 22, 2013 (21:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful picture! Bellissima immagine! |
| sent on November 22, 2013 (21:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great ;-) Ottima |
| sent on November 22, 2013 (21:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice, excellent point shooting Roberto.
Greetings
Maurizio Molto bello, ottimo il punto di ripresa Roberto.
Un saluto
Maurizio |
| sent on November 22, 2013 (21:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very very nice compliments molto molto bella complimenti |
| sent on November 22, 2013 (22:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
maybe you could even close to 10, the eye and the sin are a hair out of PDC forse si poteva chiudere anche a 10, l'occhio e il pecco sono un pelo fuori dalla PDC |
| sent on November 22, 2013 (22:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful. bella. |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (7:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wow great shot! Ottimo scatto  |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (11:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful!! Molto bella!!!! |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (12:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice but to me, looking at the full resolution version, the beak and the eye appear out of focus. Molto bella ma anche a me, guardando la versione a piena risoluzione, il becco e l'occhio sembrano fuori fuoco. |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (13:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Luigi
“ .... looking at the full resolution version, the beak and the eye appear out of focus. „
They do not seem ..... I am ..!
Note:
“ With the FF a lot and I had to get close to these distances are quite small (now the subject entering the lens) the image has a narrow pdc „
..... I had already put in a comment to the picture that the image has a very narrow PDC has these distances (just over 4.5 meters) and the multiplier with the possibility to focus on the whole are really minimal unless at least close to F11/13 ...... ;-)
You also have to take into account the size of the file that I posted as is, with no crop and no reduction is completely full frame ....
Just look at the same photo posted immediately to 2400px and defects already seen much less .... ;-)
1200px instead ..... --- is perfect!!
That's why (as the good magician Mulinai) files 1200px should be taken with the tongs and for what they are, this resolution seems to be "all good" ...... trouble (as in this case) can be seen only with better resolution and consistent and correct.
Thanks anyway to you Louis and everyone else for the visits and comments always welcome
Hello and good raga WE ....!
Roby Ciao Luigi
" .... guardando la versione a piena risoluzione, il becco e l'occhio sembrano fuori fuoco. "
Non sembrano ..... Sono..!!
Nota:
" Con il FF ho dovuto avvicinarmi tantissimo e, a queste distanze davvero minime (oramai il soggetto entrava nell'obiettivo) l'immagine ha una pdc risicata"
..... avevo già messo in commento alla foto che l'immagine ha una PDC molto risicata, ha queste distanze (poco più di 4,5 metri) e con il moltiplicatore le possibilità di mettere a fuoco tutto sono davvero minime a meno di non chiudere almeno a F11/13......
Inoltre bisogna tenere conto della grandezza del file che ho postato così come è, senza nessun crop e nessuna riduzione, completamente a pieno formato....
Basta guardare la stessa foto postata immediatamente dopo a 2400px e già i difetti si vedono molto meno....
.....a 1200px invece è perfetta---!!!!
Ecco perchè ( come dice il buon Mago Mulinai) i file a 1200px vanno presi con le molle e per quello che sono, a questa risoluzione sembra "tutto bello"...... i guai (come in questo caso) si notano solo e meglio alle risoluzione consone e corrette.
Grazie comunque a te Luigi e a tutti gli altri per le visite e di commenti sempre molto graditi
Ciao raga e buon WE....!!!
Roby |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (14:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful Bellissima |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (15:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice, congratulations Molto bella, complimenti |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (16:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A beautiful image. The photo is great if you do not open it to the entire resolution.
Your speech on the lack of depth of field at these distances by not acting gets a turn.
I check on a daily basis with the 1DX 400 and 2.8, with or without the multipliers, where there is still
less depth of field, or rather, the frying pan (400 and 600) off even more dramatically
what is in perfect focus from that it is just a bit less.
In my opinion here was also due to the noise (?), A remnant of ac and yield suboptimal
multiplier which loses sharpness off-center. All this according to me, of course.
Greetings
marcello (friend of Maurice L.) Una bella immagine. La foto è ottima se non la apri a tutta risoluzione.
Il tuo discorso sulla scarsa profondità di campo a queste distanze con ff non fà una piega.
Io lo verifico quotidianamente con la 1dx e 400 2.8, con o senza i moltiplicatori, dove c'è ancora
meno profondità di campo, o meglio, i padelloni (400 e 600) staccano ancora più drasticamente
quello che è a fuoco perfetto da quello lo è solo un pò meno.
A parer mio qui ha anche influito l'antirumore (?), un residuo di a.c. e una resa non ottimale
del moltiplicatore che perde nitidezza fuori centro. Tutto questo secondo me, ovviamente.
Un saluto
marcello ( amico di Maurizio L.) |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (17:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@ Marcello:
all ctitiche and advice like yours, are always welcome and only ...!! :-)
It Marcellus, maybe I would have gotten a lot without tisultato certainly better also, of course, the file was elborato and passed under the noise reduction ... ;-)
Thank you so much for your words to be taken into serious consideration ...!
I also hope that with the 1.4x series III many things can only get better (.... given the cost ..!)
Hello Roby @Marcello:
tutte le ctitiche e consigli come i tuoi, sono sempre e solo ben accetti...!!!! 
Si Marcello, forse senza Molti avrei ottenuto un tisultato migliore certamente inoltre, ovviamente, il file è stato elborato ed è passato sotto la riduzione rumore...
Grazie davvero per le tue parole, da tenere in seria considerazione...!!
Spero anche che con il molti 1.4x serie III le cose possano solo migliorare (.... visto il costo..!!)
Ciao Roby |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (17:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Roberto, thanks to you.
you can be sure that the 1 .4 x series III is much higher, but also the 2x III has made more uniform because ..
wasting the quality of the file 1DX/500 F4L with a multiplier up. Certainly not cheap. ciao Roberto, grazie a te.
puoi stare sicuro che l'1.4x serie III è nettamente superiore, ma anche il 2x III ha una resa più uniforme..perché
sprecare la qualità del file 1DX/500 f4l con un moltiplicatore non all'altezza. Certo non costa poco. |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (18:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice clip! |
Sharpness to top
Likes
Mark Bello scatto !!!|
Nitidezza al top
Mi Piace
Marco |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
17.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
