What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 16, 2023 (15:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Capers... If the diaphragm had been less closed and the focal length had been lower, there would not have been the microblur of the little fish and the blur of the Martin's head. I think it's the first time the subject has caught you off guard ;-)
(imho)
Hi, Lauro Capperi... se il diaframma fosse stato meno chiuso e la focale fosse stata inferiore non si avrebbe avuto il micromosso del pesciolino e il mosso della testa del martino. Credo che sia la prima volta che il soggetto ti ha preso in contropiede 
(imho)
Ciao, Lauro |
| sent on October 16, 2023 (16:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Laurel. Yes, the rules are as you say, but, sometimes the mistake doesn't come to harm. You should explain how to show motion in a still image (not a movie). With the blur, there is no other system and in this case I see the "action" and I have also been lucky enough that the prey, although moved, is very legible. That's how I see it, then everyone can interpret it as they want. Hello and thank you for the comment that gave me way to the discussion. Lauro. Si le regole sono come dici tu, ma, a volte lo sbaglio non viene per nuocere. Dovresti spiegare come si fa a far vedere un movimento in una immagine fissa (non filmato). Con il mosso, non c'è altro sistema e in questo caso io vedo l'"azione e ho anche avuto la fortuna che la preda, benché mossa sia leggibilissima. Questo è come la vedo io, poi ognuno la può interpretare come vuole. Ciao e grazie per il commento che mi ha dato modo alla discussione. |
| sent on October 16, 2023 (16:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Magnificent capture. Hi Corrado Magnifica cattura. Ciao Corrado |
| sent on October 16, 2023 (16:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The project is not easy Archangel also because it would take collaborative subjects but the idea of the action, always in my opinion, could have been achieved with the sharp/frozen fish and the microwavy of the martin's head. So, it took very little to achieve it by opening the aperture slightly... Consider that I'm arguing sitting at the computer, in hindsight everything seems easier, but on the field ... :-)
Hello, Lauro Il progetto non è facile Arcangelo anche perchè ci vorrebbero i soggetti collaborativi ma l'idea dell'azione , sempre secondo me, poteva essere raggiunta con il pesciolino nitido/congelato e il micromosso della testa del martino. Quindi, bastava davvero poco per ottenerlo aprendo leggermente il diaframma ... considera che sto argomentando seduto al computer, con il senno di poi sembra tutto più facile , ma sul campo ... 
Ciao, Lauro |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
