What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 30, 2023 (18:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What a detail! Che dettaglio! |
| sent on September 30, 2023 (18:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sigma 17mm is scary. Sigma 17mm fa paura. |
| sent on October 01, 2023 (11:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Have you compared it with other lenses you have used? The minimum focusing distance is interesting Hai avuto modo di confrontarlo con altre lenti che hai usato? É interessante la minima distanza di messa a fuoco |
| sent on October 01, 2023 (11:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Directly I did not compare with fine wide angles, indirectly I downloaded files of the Voight 15mm and I chose the Sigma.
Before I had a Tamron 20mm f2.8, the Sigma is clearly a superior lens.
It quietly keeps up with the Sigma 35 f2 and 65 f2 I have.
Download this at 42 mpx without corrections or anything else and watch it with your viewer from edge to edge.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1smGRPxDzzmhhQcFJk6UxBTgobP2FTow2/view?usp=sharing Direttamente non ho confrontato con grandangoli di pregio, indirettamente ho scaricato file del Voight 15mm e ho scelto il Sigma.
Prima avevo un Tamron 20mm f2.8, il Sigma è nettamente un ottica superiore.
Tiene tranquillamente il passo con il Sigma 35 f2 e 65 f2 che ho.
Scarica questa a 42 mpx senza correzioni o altro e guardala con tuo viewer da bordo a bordo.
drive.google.com/file/d/1smGRPxDzzmhhQcFJk6UxBTgobP2FTow2/view?usp=sha
non guardarla sul browser che peggiora, scaricala. |
| sent on October 01, 2023 (12:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Oh not bad... I'm torn in this period whether to return to fixed optics selling the 16-35 pcs, and this sigma is interesting, although in the reviews one does not recommend it because it is "too perfect"
I read now that it is your review haha Eh niente male... sono combattuto in questo periodo se tornare alle ottiche fisse vendendo il 16-35 pz, e questo sigma é interessante, anche se nelle recensioni uno lo sconsiglia perché é "troppo perfetto"
Ho letto ora che é la tua recensione ahah |
| sent on October 01, 2023 (12:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I hope you understand the irony of the review :-D Spero si capisca l'ironia della recensione |
| sent on October 01, 2023 (14:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Actually I don't know, because I've already read someone who criticized the optics too perfect ... I had the Voigtlander15 and I loved that lens, then I switched to zoom for versatility. Only if about the photos I take with the new 16-35, they are very sharp but there is something that does not convince me all the way, but I do not understand what In realtà non saprei, perché ho già letto qualcuno che ha criticato le ottiche troppo perfettine... io ho avuto il voigtlander15 e ho amato quella lente, poi sono passato allo zoom per la versatilità. Solo che se riguardo le foto che faccio con il nuovo 16-35, sono molto nitide ma c'è qualcosa che non mi convince fino in fondo, ma non capisco cosa |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
