What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 28, 2023 (10:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent attempt... Successful test in full ;-)
congratulations.
Hello, Carlo Eccellente tentativo... Prova riuscita in pieno
Complimenti.
Ciao, Carlo |
| sent on March 28, 2023 (11:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Carlo digitization hides a few flaws of the lens that in projection instead could be seen well. The sigma of those times was not really a monster, high distortion (by the standards of the time) and weird sharpness profile. Barely off-center areas of the frame blurry and so-so edges. In short, that kit in my hands lasted just over 8 months. Time to understand that I could not mix data that came from sigma with those of zeiss. I think a lot also depended on the unreliability of the canon+sigma fire confirmation. Too bad.
thanks and greetings Carlo la digitalizzazione "nasconde" un po' di pecche dell'obiettivo che in proiezione invece si vedevano bene. Il sigma di quei tempi non era proprio un mostro, distorsione elevata (secondo gli standard di allora) e profilo di nitidezza strambo. Zone appena decentrate del fotogramma poco nitide e bordi così così. Insomma quel corredo tra le mie mani durò poco più di 8 mesi. Il tempo di capire che non potevo mischiare dia che provenivano dal sigma con quelle degli zeiss. Penso che molto dipendesse anche dall'inaffidabilità della conferma fuoco canon+sigma. Peccato.
grazie ed un saluto
p.s.: "nasconde" = maschera di nitidezza e correzione distorsione a cuscinetto + trapezio |
| sent on March 28, 2023 (13:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Common experience, but with the Tamron and Vivitar lenses of the ordinary series, in fact worse than the corresponding Yashica optics. Vivitar Series 1 and Tamron SP, on the other hand, also slightly better than the corresponding Yashica. The only Sigma used was a 400 mm. f. 5,6, not really satisfactory to any diaphragm, but I must point out that I had the claim to use it freehand, without tripod ;-)
Switched, then, to Contax Zeiss, I no longer had third-party objectives until my transition :-P to digital 8-)
Esperienza comune, ma con gli obiettivi Tamron e Vivitar delle serie ordinarie, di fatto peggiori delle corrispondenti ottiche Yashica. Vivitar Serie 1 e Tamron SP, invece, anche leggermente migliori dei corrispondenti Yashica. L'unico Sigma utilizzato è stato un 400 mm. f. 5,6, non proprio soddisfacente a nessun diaframma, ma devo precisare che ho avuto la pretesa di utilizzarlo a mano libera, senza treppiede
Passato, poi, a Contax Zeiss, non ho più avuto obiettivi di terze parti fino al mio trapasso  al digitale 
|
| sent on March 28, 2023 (14:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The "decisive" and contrasted one, characteristic of a sunny day... I very much like, and even if the passage may have hidden / masked a little bit, the attempt / result is top 8-)
Nice pdr ;-)
With Sigma 28-200 aspherical macro, with which I started shooting today with the F100, in digit I had some disappointment, but it was obvious, in analog instead, for years it surprised me and not a little :-o we will see weekend
Salutoni Quello "deciso" e contrastato, caratteristico di una giornata di sole...a me molto gradito, e anche se il passaggio può aver nascosto/mascherato qualcosina, il tentativo/risultato è top
Bel pdr
Col Sigma 28-200 aspherical macro, col quale ho iniziato a scattare oggi con la F100, in digit ho avuto qualche delusione, ma era ovvio, in analogico invece, per anni mi ha sorpreso e non poco vedremo fine week
Salutoni |
| sent on March 28, 2023 (15:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Lino I think there was also a considerable variability between specimens and maybe I touched one not really well. The fact is that there was no competition, at least for the projection, between that 28-70ex 2.8 and the zeiss, not only for the sharpness that in the sigma was still discreet but also for the brilliance of the colors, distortion correction ... If you limited yourself to small prints, however, it was not bad. But I was launched into the projection by now. And so contax was.
Lino credo ci fosse anche una notevole variabilità tra esemplari e forse a me tocco' uno non proprio venuto bene. Sta di fatto che non c'era competizione, almeno per la proiezione, tra quel 28-70ex 2.8 e gli zeiss, non solo per la nitidezza che nel sigma era comunque discreta ma anche per la brillantezza dei colori, correzione della distorsione...Se ci si limitava alle stampe piccole però non era male. Ma io ero lanciato nella proiezione ormai. E così contax fu.
|
| sent on March 28, 2023 (17:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
And to say that it doesn't even look like a slide scan from over 30 years ago. Congratulations. E dire che non sembra neppure una scansione da diapositiva di oltre 30 anni fa. Complimenti. |
| sent on March 28, 2023 (18:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fabio actually a difference between specimens happened very often, more often than with today's optics, I remember reading about it at that time in different magazines, even if the concrete fact remains, that you have to have the "broad shoulders" to be able to compete with Zeiss, and obviously in the projection you have to have the top ... 8-)
Fabio effettivamente una differenza fra esemplari capitava molto spesso, più spesso che con le ottiche odierne, ricordo di averne letto a quei tempi su diverse riviste, anche se resta il fatto concreto, che bisogna avere le "spalle larghe" per poter competere con Zeiss, ed ovviamente nella proiezione devi avere il top...
|
| sent on March 28, 2023 (19:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
............. a see to me very welcome ............... ............. un vedere a me molto gradito ............... |
| sent on March 28, 2023 (19:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great classic dear Fabio!
It is usually photographed in the evening from this perspective, in long exposure.
Well done and seen! ;-) Ottimo classico caro Fabio!
Di solito lo si fotografa di sera da quest'ottica, in lunga esposizione.
Ben fatto e visto! |
| sent on March 28, 2023 (20:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice BW, congratulations! ;-) Bel BW, complimenti! |
| sent on March 29, 2023 (18:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks everybody gli friends
Good evening and A hug grazie a tutti gli amici
buona serata ed un abbraccio |
| sent on March 29, 2023 (19:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A classic glimpse well taken, it looks like a photo with a vintage effect, not a scan.
Congratulations
Elizabeth Uno scorcio classico ben ripreso, sembra una foto con effetto vintage, non una scansione.
Complimenti
Elisabetta |
| sent on March 29, 2023 (19:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations Fabio, beautiful
pdr and beautiful composition in a great b /
w.Hello and good evening,
Paul Complimenti Fabio,
bellissimo pdr e bellissima composizone in un ottimo b/n.
Ciao e buona serata,
Paolo |
| sent on March 29, 2023 (19:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice toning. Good evening Corrado Bel viraggio. Buona serata Corrado |
| sent on March 29, 2023 (19:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice image, I like the contrast and expressive effectiveness of the b /
w.Congratulations for the wise recovery.
Best regards,
Andrea Immagine molto bella, mi piacciono il contrasto e l'efficacia espressiva del b/n.
Complimenti per il sapiente recupero.
Un caro saluto,
Andrea |
| sent on March 29, 2023 (21:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful shooting and b / w :-) Bellissimi scatto e b/n |
| sent on March 29, 2023 (22:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful ;-) great PDR ;-) Bellissima ottimo PDR |
| sent on March 29, 2023 (22:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful image, excellent scan and nice bn, congratulations Fabio!
Bellissima immagine, ottima scansione e bel bn, complimenti Fabio!
|
| sent on March 29, 2023 (23:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A beautiful image ... you did a great job
Congratulations and a greeting, Vito Una bella immagine ... hai fatto un ottimo lavoro
Complimenti e un saluto, Vito |
| sent on March 30, 2023 (0:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
amazement of contrasts
... Definitely high quality, great job! stupore di contrasti
... qualità decisamente elevata, ottimo lavoro! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
7.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
