Fly Kaja fly | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Sport

8.5 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Volley View gallery (23 photos)

Fly Kaja fly sent on February 23, 2023 (22:26) by Pittis. 2 comments, 102 views.

at 85mm, 1/1250 f/4.0, ISO 6400,

#pallavolo

View High Resolution 8.5 MP

2 persons like it: Flavio Bucciarelli, Indulal

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Elleemme

sent on February 25, 2023 (13:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Good freezing but it was preferable: a) do not
give 15mm b)
do not cut your hand c) include the ball
because it jumps the triangulation she who sees the ball we see her who sees the ball
Council: For these occasions better go in search of a used ff with guarantee ;-)
85mm on apsc is equivalent to 136mm size 35mm
to 85mm on ff you would not have excluded the ball
(imho)
Hello, Lauro

Pittis

sent on February 25, 2023 (18:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Lauro, even in this case I can only agree.
At the time of taking an FF there is no talk of it, when I am so close to the field I could use the 24-105, although the yield of the 70-200 I prefer it.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.