What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 17, 2022 (16:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
8 shots for such a "flat" subject I find them somewhat useless. Why not do less and use a more closed aperture (as well as lower ISOs, being on a tripod)? 8 scatti per un soggetto così "piatto" li trovo alquanto inutili. Perché non farne meno e usare un diaframma più chiuso (così come ISO più bassi, essendo su treppiede)? |
| sent on June 17, 2022 (16:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for the relevant remark. In fact, the first shots were taken with very closed diaphragms, but the contour "twigs" that I wanted to be highlighted better (the title is "In his kingdom") were somewhat blurred. Therefore 1 shot on the back, 2 on the legs, 2 on both claws, 1 on the tail and 2 on the very prominent twigs (deliberately a little blurred) with respect to the plane of the subject.
Have a nice weekend. Grazie per l'osservazione pertinente. In effetti i primi scatti sono stati effettuati con diaframmi molto chiusi, ma erano alquanto sfuocati i "rametti" di contorno che volevo venissero evidenziati meglio (il titolo è "Nel suo regno"). Pertanto 1 scatto sul dorso, 2 sulle zampe, 2 su entrambe le chele, 1 sulla coda e 2 sui rametti molto prominenti (volutamente un po' sfocati) rispetto al piano del soggetto.
Buona fine settimana. |
| sent on June 17, 2022 (16:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I could not load the image (38 mega) „
To be able to observe the photo in high resolution without skimming too much especially with monitors of classic size better to insert images of 3/4000px " non riuscivo a caricare l'immagine (38 mega)"
Per poter osservare la foto in alta risoluzione senza scarrucolare più di tanto soprattutto con monitor di dimensioni classiche meglio inserire immagini di 3/4000px |
| sent on June 18, 2022 (20:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful shot, I really like the composition and excellent technique, congratulations!
Hello Bellissimo scatto, mi piace molto la composizione e ottima tecnica, complimenti!
Ciao |
| sent on June 19, 2022 (2:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you, Marco, for your welcome visit and even more so for your appreciation.
Have a nice day. Grazie, Marco, per la tua gradita visita e ancor più per l'apprezzamento.
Buona giornata. |
| sent on June 19, 2022 (13:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice.
Greetings Molto bella.
Un saluto |
| sent on June 19, 2022 (14:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks, Daniele. Have a nice Sunday. Grazie, Daniele. Buona Domenica. |
| sent on June 28, 2022 (15:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
........... very but very interesting ..... I like it a lot .....
7 hello Ray Palm- ...........molto ma molto interessante .....a me piace un sacco .....
7 ciao Ray Palm- |
| sent on June 28, 2022 (15:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You make me smile, Ema. And then they say that with digital it is easier ... as always it depends ...
Your Abarth :-P :-P :-P :-P I really like, even as a setting. On focus stacking, manual or in the room, I think it was necessary. Even at f 16, at this distance, the pdc is insufficient for a whole in focus.
Excellent also the light and colors.
Congratulations!
Cage65
Mi fai sorridere, Ema. E poi dicono che con il digitale è più facile ... come sempre dipende ...
Il tuo Abarth  a me piace molto, anche come ambientazione. Sul focus stacking, manuale o in camera, credo fosse necessario. Anche a f 16, a questa distanza, la pdc è insufficiente per un tutto a fuoco.
Ottima anche la luce e i colori.
Complimentissimi!
Gabbia65
|
| sent on June 28, 2022 (16:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like it very much and it seems to me very well executed, congratulations.
Hello
Antonello A me piace molto e mi pare molto ben eseguita, complimenti.
Ciao
Antonello |
| sent on June 28, 2022 (23:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Ray, Gabbia, Antonello.
@ Ray, seeing your mustache fills me with joy (even red noses, for the real :-D )
@ Cage: FOR ME, digital is extremely more complicated and much less fun than analog. I spent
whole days in the darkroom for the development of b / w and give and I had certainly more rewarding results than
today. Now, to suffer less, I have eliminated all the automatic mechanisms from my Nikon, leaving only the
priority of the apertures. Maf strictly manual, post-production practically zero. But how do I live
happily!!! Grazie Ray, Gabbia, Antonello.
@ Ray, vedere i tuoi baffi mi riempie di gioia (anche i nasi rossi, per il vero  )
@ Gabbia: PER ME, il digitale è estremamente più complicato e moooolto meno divertente dell'analogico. Trascorrevo
intere giornate in camera oscura per lo sviluppo di b/n e dia ed avevo risultati certamente più gratificanti di
oggi. Ora, per soffrire meno, ho eliminato tutti i meccanismi automatici dalle mie Nikon (la prima -d700- comprata
usata per "allenarmi" col digitale) , lasciando solo la
priorità dei diaframmi. Maf rigorosamente manuale, post-produzione praticamente zero. Ma come vivo
felice!!! |
| sent on June 29, 2022 (21:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
:-) :-) :-) strange to think that even today, if you want, you can take photographs.
However, if you are consoled, Marianna Santoni who has embraced the exposure to the right, also removes the automatic white balance.
I still remember with pleasure, the amused comment of a photographer, to one of his courses. When Marianna said to remove all kinds of automatism including white balance, this person of great spirit said that he had just spent a lot of money on a camera full of automatic devils, stating that having known it before he would never have done it :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D We all laughed with him, but the moral is unequivocal.
Good light, Ema49, and lots of fun!
Cage65  strano pensare che anche oggi, se vuoi, le fotografie le puoi fare tu.
Comunque, se ti consola, Marianna Santoni che ha sposato l'esposizione a destra, toglie anche il bilanciamento del bianco automatico.
Ricordo ancora con piacere il commento divertito di un fotografo, ad un suo corso. Quando Marianna disse di togliere ogni tipo di automatismo compreso il bilanciamento del bianco, questa persona di grande spirito disse che aveva appena speso un mucchio di soldi per una macchina fotografica piena di diavolerie automatiche, affermando che avendolo saputo prima mai lo avrebbe fatto Con lui abbiamo riso tutti, ma la morale è inequivocabile.
Buona luce, Ema49, e tanto buon divertimento!
Gabbia65 |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
22.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
