What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 30, 2022 (17:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What elegance! Refined colors!... Really a wonder, congratulations! (Even to the model, it's gorgeous!) :-) Che eleganza! Colori raffinatissimi!...Davvero una meraviglia, complimenti! (Anche alla modella, è splendida!) |
| sent on March 30, 2022 (19:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful
but the umbrella reflected so in the glasses just you can not see
hello bella
ma l'ombrello riflesso così nell'occhiale proprio non si può vedere
ciao |
| sent on March 30, 2022 (21:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Why tattoos and the horrible nose ring like a cow?.... already, it's fashion... Perché i tatuaggi e l'orribile anello al naso come una mucca?....a già, è la moda... |
| sent on March 30, 2022 (22:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree on the reflected umbrella (and on the nose ring but it has nothing to do with it).
Rather: why shoot in the studio at 3200ISO when with flashes you can shoot at 100? I do not understand.. concordo sull'ombrello riflesso (e sull'anello a naso ma non c'entra).
Piuttosto: perché scattare in studio a 3200ISO quando con i flash puoi scattare a 100? non capisco.. |
| sent on March 30, 2022 (22:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
they were probably continuous lights and not flashes. or maybe he used only the pilot light because maybe the trigger at that time was had by others, in fact he is posing for someone else; you will tell me that for a subject laid 1/100 was + that sufficient and consequently even the iso could lower them ... but I don't think the gfx 100s has iso
sealing problems probabilmente erano luci continue e non flash. o forse ha usato solo la luce pilota perchè magari il trigger in quel momento lo avevano altri, infatti è in posa per qualcun altro; mi dirai che per un soggetto posato 1/100 era + che sufficiente e di conseguenza anche gli iso poteva abbassarli... ma non credo che la gfx 100s abbia problemi di tenuta iso
|
| sent on March 31, 2022 (0:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ecco a f4 is much better in my opinion for studio portraits, at least it has that sharpness that is fashionable today, despite the 3200 iso.
Mat Ecco a f4 é molto migliore secondo me per i ritratti in studio, quantomeno ha quella nitidezza che va di moda oggi, nonostante i 3200 iso.
Mat |
| sent on March 31, 2022 (9:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find the reflection on the lens a finesse, it looks like a flower. Trovo il riflesso sulla lente una finezza, sembra un fiore. |
| sent on March 31, 2022 (10:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ you will tell me that for a subject laid 1/100 was + that sufficient and consequently even the iso could lower them ... „
micro-bone risk? (hypotexts) " mi dirai che per un soggetto posato 1/100 era + che sufficiente e di conseguenza anche gli iso poteva abbassarli..."
rischio micromosso? (ipotesti) |
| sent on March 31, 2022 (10:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for the comments (on the photo, while I invite you to avoid those on tattoos and piercings that seem irrelevant to me).
I was in the studio with continuous light, hence the high ISO. With 100 megapixels it takes very little to have microwavy, so I preferred to raise the sensitivity a little more, better a little grain than a blurred photo ;-)
This one I uploaded at full resolution and gives better the idea of the detail of the GFX100S: www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=4208598&l=it Grazie a tutti per i commenti (sulla foto, mentre vi invito a evitare quelli su tatuaggi e piercing che mi sembrano poco pertinenti).
Ero in studio con luce continua, da qui gli ISO alti. Con 100 megapixel basta pochissimo per avere micromosso, quindi ho preferito alzare un po' più la sensibilità, meglio un po' di grana che una foto mossa 
Quest'altra l'ho caricata a piena risoluzione e dà meglio l'idea del dettaglio della GFX100S: www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=4208598&l=it |
| sent on March 31, 2022 (10:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The set was in continuous light because shooting in many people the flashes could not be managed, not even as charging times. In addition, the lens of the GFX is an f4, so not very bright. The reflection in the glasses is a Chinese lamp (not an umbrella) and was mounted on a 400w led monolight with continuous light ;-)
For me this is beautiful Il set era in luce continua perché scattando in tante persone i flash non si potevano gestire, nemmeno come tempi di ricarica. Inoltre l'obiettivo della GFX è un f4, quindi non luminosissimo. Il riflesso nell'occhiale è una lampada cinese (non un'ombrello) ed è stato montato su un monoluce a led da 400w a luce continua
Per me questa è bellissima |
| sent on April 01, 2022 (8:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful her, the pose .....
But the umbrella reflected either you tried to eliminate with the
post, or moved.
It ruined the photo . Bellissima lei , la posa .....
Però l'ombrello riflesso o si provava a eliminare con la post
, o si spostava .
Ha rovinato la foto . |
| sent on April 04, 2022 (10:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In my opinion this is the best. Too bad for the reflection of the umbrella in the glasses Secondo me questa è la migliore. Peccato per il riflesso dell'ombrello nell'occhiale |
| sent on April 04, 2022 (13:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Micromosso on gfx100s? Not detected.
I also shoot with manual lenses at 1/15
sec.Not to mention studio shots at 1/125.
https://www.juzaphoto.com/hr.php?t=4177606&r=68357&l=it Micromosso sulla gfx100s? Non rilevato.
Ci scatto anche con lenti manuali ad 1/15 sec.
Per non parlare di scatti in studio ad 1/125.
www.juzaphoto.com/hr.php?t=4177606&r=68357&l=it
|
| sent on April 04, 2022 (16:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
She is very beautiful.. of course the tattoos she has on her skin know me just ugly (not the tattoos themselves, but those that she has specifically) :-/ Lei è molto bella.. certo che i Tatuaggi che ha sulla pelle mi sanno proprio brutti (non i tatuaggi in se, ma quelli che ha lei nello specifico)  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
21.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
