What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 22, 2021 (19:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not bad, what times did you use, astro tracker? Non male, che tempi hai usato, astro inseguitore? |
| sent on November 22, 2021 (19:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Kean, it's 30 Lights and a dozen Dark, 6 seconds and 1600 ISO. Made with A5000 full spectrum + Star Adventurer (defective, which is why in recent years I had tried to do astrophoto several times, without bringing home a decent shot, but now I have found a way to solve the problem) Y's a test shot, next session I will definitely lengthen the time, reducing the ISO! Ciao Kean, sono 30 Lights e una decina di Dark, 6 secondi e 1600 ISO. Fatto con A5000 full spectrum + Star Adventurer (difettoso, motivo per cui negli ultimi anni a più riprese avevo provato a fare astrofoto, senza portare a casa uno scatto decente, ma ora ho trovato il modo di risolvere il problema) E' uno scatto di prova, prossima sessione allungherò sicuramente i tempi, riducendo gli ISO! |
| sent on November 22, 2021 (21:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello Bender, very nice, bravo ! 8-) is my opinion, rather than lowering the ISO, you could reduce the noise in post production. if you use photoshop, with camera raw filter you would get an excellent result in a short time. ciao Bender, molto bella, bravo ! a mio avviso, più che abbassare gli ISO, potresti ridurre il rumore in post produzione. se usi photoshop, con filtro camera raw otterresti in breve un eccellente risultato. |
| sent on November 22, 2021 (22:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Serafix, actually with Color Range + Camera Raw you can eliminate much of the noise without introducing artifacts :-P Grazie Serafix, effettivamente con Color Range + Camera Raw si riesce ad eliminare buona parte del rumore senza introdurre artefatti |
| sent on November 23, 2021 (19:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have already told you in the dedicated topic, but I renew the compliments ... great first attempt! Te l'ho già detto nel topic dedicato, ma rinnovo i complimenti... ottimo primo tentativo! |
| sent on December 11, 2021 (2:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good, good first, many nice details! Concoding with Serafix to leave the ISO unchanged, in addition to the PP you could in the next session contain the noise by making darker (between 30 and 50) to be added to the stacking program together with bias shots; with my Micro four thirds (which of noise abounds of its own) the noise is decently contained with 50 dark. Buona, buona la prima, molti bei dettagli! Concordo con Serafix per lasciare gli ISO invariati, oltre alla PP potresti nella prossima sessione contenere il rumore facendo più dark (tra 30 e 50) da aggiungere al programma di stacking insieme a degli scatti bias; con la mia Micro quattro terzi (che di rumore abbonda di suo) il rumore viene dignitosamente contenuto con 50 dark. |
| sent on December 11, 2021 (18:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Zanidem, surely I will have to devote more time to both lights and darks, on bias I have read conflicting opinions, do they actually benefit? Grazie Zanidem, sicuramente dovrò dedicare più tempo sia ai lights che ai darks, sui Bias ho letto pareri contrastanti, portano effettivamente beneficio? |
| sent on December 11, 2021 (22:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If you use flats yes, that way you can correct the flats (I forgot to mention them!) from the noise they carry with them - which is different from that generated by the dark. Se si usano i flat sì, in quel modo puoi correggere i flat (ho dimenticato di citarli!) dal rumore che si portano dietro - che è diverso da quello generato dai dark. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |