What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 10, 2021 (14:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
why f2.8? perchè f2,8? |
| sent on February 10, 2021 (16:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Maybe he wanted to do some proof of the yield of 2.8? Sisi will tell us
Bel landscape with a nice reflection Forse ha voluto fare qualche prova sulla resa del 2.8? Ce lo dirà sisi
Bel paesaggio con un bel riflesso |
| sent on February 10, 2021 (20:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But were you free-hand Diego? :-/ Ma eri a mano libera Diego?  |
| sent on February 10, 2021 (20:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I really like the sense of depth that photography expresses.... but 2.8...
ao fabrizio Mi piace molto il senso di profondità che esprime la fotografia....però 2.8...
ciao fabrizio |
| sent on February 10, 2021 (21:04)
The light in the clouds is fantastic.
Hello: Delphinus
|
| sent on February 10, 2021 (21:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I don't
the history of the nd filter, but to increase the depth you had to close the diaphragm... iso base... and time if be occupied the car, all the more so having the easel you would not have had problems with the exposure time. Holding f2.8 there's nothing on fire practically and it's a shame Non capisco la
Storia del filtro nd, ma Per aumentare la profondità dovevi chiudere il diaframma...iso base...e del tempo se be occupava la macchina, a maggior ragione avendo il cavalletto non avresti avuto problemi con il tempo di esposizione. Tenendo f2,8 non c'è nulla a fuoco praticamente ed è un peccato |
| sent on February 10, 2021 (22:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
yes but closing the diaphragm I had to increase the times and I didn't want the clouds to spread, although I usually like to photograph with long exposures. si ma chiudendo il diaframma dovevo aumentare i tempi e non volevo lo spappolamento delle nuvole, anche se di solito mi piace fotografare con lunghe esposizioni. |
| sent on February 10, 2021 (22:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
removing the nd filter I could close the diaphragm more, this I meant... togliendo il filtro nd potevo chiudere più il diaframma, questo intendevo... |
| sent on February 10, 2021 (23:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm sorry, but I don't understand...
don't close the diaphragm so you don't have a long time because you want the clouds still but then you put an nd? of how many stops?
were even only 3 stops of nd... taking it off you could have kept f5.6 keeping the same exposure time and it would have been a little better
in my opinion if the exposure had also lasted 8 seconds the clouds would not have been too moved and the photo would have gained a lot.
the beauty of the scene you have taken is the reflection in the water of the clouds, which balances the whole sky, only at f2.8 it is all blurry and almost bothered the eyes. scusa ma non capisco...
non chiudi il diaframma per non avere un tempo lungo perché vuoi le nuvole ferme ma poi ci metti un nd? di quanti stop?
fossero anche solo 3 stop di nd...togliendolo avresti potuto tenere f5,6 mantenendo lo stesso tempo di esposizione e sarebbe andata un po meglio
secondo me se anche l'esposizione fosse durata 8 secondi le nuvole non sarebbero state troppo mosse e la foto ne avrebbe guadagnato molto.
il bello della scena che hai ripreso è il riflesso nell'acqua delle nuvole, che bilancia tutto il cielo, solo che a f2,8 è tutto sfocato e da quasi fastidio agli occhi. |
| sent on November 07, 2022 (15:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beyond the shooting data and criticism of general judgments I find this photo a unique beauty. As a painter that I am it is a painting, distinguishable but without that sharpness like "crispy". If we want to say it all this photo should be seen printed, 35x50 format, and not from a monitor of just 2k zooming to 200%. Congratulations dear Diego, ad maiora
Aldilà dei dati di scatto e delle critiche sui giudizi generali io trovo questa foto una bellezza unica. Da pittore che sono è un dipinto, distinguibile ma senza quella nitidezza tipo "crispy". Se vogliamo dirla tutta questa foto va vista stampata, formato 35x50, e non da un monitor di appena 2k zoomando all200%. Complimenti caro Diego, ad maiora
|
| sent on November 07, 2022 (18:20) | This comment has been translated
Thank you! Cheers |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
43.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
