RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm



 
Floret...

Macro e Flora

View gallery (21 photos)

Floret sent on February 05, 2013 (23:32) by Nons66. 8 comments, 687 views. [retina]

, 1/1000 f/2.8, ISO 100, hand held.




View High Resolution 6.7 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 193000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on February 09, 2013 (14:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A "macro" without shooting data leaves little room for comments ... one can only say: good or bad ......

avatarjunior
sent on February 09, 2013 (23:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

which is what every artist wants ... we do not ask whether the director has used a certain type of room or what filters he used to make his film, we simply emozioniamo to see his images and friends tell us that liked best.
it's nice to be able to write good or bad!
Hello Nunzio :-)

avatarsenior
sent on February 10, 2013 (14:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Forgive me, but your example does not fit at all with the spirit of the forum ...
However, if you are an artist, then I apologize ... ;-)
By virtue of the fact that I'm not, comment with the spirit of the forum: to share opinions and criticism with the goal of mutual growth. The board is not an art gallery or a personal website. By virtue of this I find reductive limited to the good or bad. Comments of this kind I would love not having to ever receive.
Arrogance aside, at times, a few suggestions can help us to grow as well as inspire any emulators ... of course, unless you want to remain mediocre artists ...
Hello and thank you for the comparison ;-)
Giorgio

avatarjunior
sent on February 10, 2013 (15:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Every now and then me "shooting" and I like to argue, but I agree with you ... and also why I'm on this site. In the end we are all "Artists" Hello Joeb to the next! :-P

avatarsenior
sent on February 10, 2013 (18:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In the end we are all "Artists"


I do not consider myself an artist, even though I think I can learn a lot from the shooting data that the user enters the picture. This leads me to reflect and try to interpret the success or failure of the photo, assimilating the good things or bad to imitate them or exclude them from my work. That's why the shooting data are important.
In this case, the success of your work may like or not, but I think you are more gratified if the viewer can write two lines of what the shot can convey. It seems very superficial write beautiful or ugly, or click on the button I like it.
Here I feel that the sharpness is lacking and the pp is a bit 'heavy, leading to have oversaturated colors.
& Of course andgrave, a simple opinion of a person always willing to learn in the hope that with the experience to make less and less mistakes.

avatarjunior
sent on February 11, 2013 (0:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

We say that we are "Artisans of Photography."
I never managed to descivere emotion "clearly" but often "full" strength.
I personally find that the precise reproduction of reality is more useful to an excellent catalog for the sale of products.
as regards the shooting data are useful to the simple description of each single photo published, and little need for its reproduction on the field ... too many variables in reality even after only a few minutes, to use the same.
good job to all
Nuncio

avatarsenior
sent on February 11, 2013 (10:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You're absolutely right, but personal tastes always lead to choices. In fact, I love artists like Raphael, Giotto, Michelangelo and the various Picasso.

avatarjunior
sent on February 11, 2013 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Finally in tune Michelangelo is my "Myth"! ... But poor Picasso also has its own why. ah ah ah!
The next Pigi47
Nuncio



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me