RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Nudo
  4. » Untitled Photo

 



ATTENTION! This gallery shows artistic nude photos, included full frontal nude, both male and female. DO NOT visit this gallery if:

1) You don't are at least 18 years old.

2) You get easily annoyed by nude photos (the definition of 'artistic nude' is rather subjective, so some photos may be unpleasing).

3) Do not visit this section if you want to see only good photos: as for every gallery, the quality of the photos goes from excellent to very bad.



If you are over 18 and you want to see these photos, click here.


To save your preference, join JuzaPhoto!



portraits

View gallery (21 photos)



Attention: the definition of 'artistic nude' is very subjective and some photos may look inappropriate.

If you don't want to see the photos or this user, click here: ignore this user


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 195000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on February 02, 2013 (18:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The phrase I like very much but alas ... you can see the shake! 1/80 - 1/100 sec. I think it would be safer! Hello and .. congratulations!

avatarsenior
sent on February 02, 2013 (22:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Elegance that is beautiful, natural and sensual without falling into the vernacular, is a magnificent photo.
Were you able to have a very good connection with the model, we see that she is comfortable and this contributes in particular to give the picture an atmosphere of shared intimacy.

I think this is the secret of a perfect portrait and you have reached this milestone.

Bravo.

Hello,
James.

avatarsenior
sent on February 03, 2013 (11:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I find it nice and communicative. for the lights, I would say that depends from the equipment one has.

avatarjunior
sent on February 03, 2013 (16:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you all for the passage ...

I would like to deepen the wrong light. Incidentally no equipment .. only the (very little) light streaming through a window ... and when I say little, it can be compared to the light it emits only television on 2 meters away in a room completely dark.

I could not take the stand because there was not enough space: (I posted mostly because I was impressed with the performance of super bright lens like this.

However, I am looking for criticism in any way (positive or negative) ... but I'd like them to be argued ...

Long live the free interpretation .. but if the light is completely absent for the similarities raffaelliait, perhaps at that moment did not I see the raffaelliano :)

The limited availability of equipment, in this case light, nn is an excuse for me are sincere ... in the sense that if I thought so drastically that it was not totally wrong scatterei. In this case, it did not feel bad because although little (and very cold, balanced later) was soft enough to stand a good complexion and with a good balance in the coverage of the shadows.

@ Moth I'm interested because of the totally wrong.

All this written in the most profound esteem for you and hope to be considered a friend sicero and without malice :)

Alberto

avatarsenior
sent on February 03, 2013 (17:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I repeat that I like very much, the lighting is soft and supple.
I find it very suited to this scene to the photographed subject.

For me it is a nice photo, I also studied carefully during installation and in the eyes of the model that is sensual but at the same time introspective and brooding.
This is what matters most in this photo.


Hello,
James.

avatarjunior
sent on February 03, 2013 (17:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you James .. adding :) As soon as I have a free second I dive into your stream at a quick glance it seems very nice .. I am also quite hyena eh: P but thank you for the time you spend a thoughtful reflection

avatarjunior
sent on February 03, 2013 (18:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Even I find a nice picture from the bottom of my inexperience ...
I agree only shake for charity, but I do not see the reason for so much criticism ...
Hello! ^ __ ^

avatarjunior
sent on February 03, 2013 (20:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for the detailed explanation ...

I've tripped over the edge appreciable ... no .. but it is strictly personal opinion. If appreciable means for light and "shake". By my limit as the side of the message I seem to be able to communicate .. and how literature is full of pictures much more than move without disturbing blur "creative".

Certainly in the technical flaw. Anyway, the "shake" is not identifiable as such: face, with areas most sensitive lips of hair and eyes, it seems to me clear. The hand is clearly move but I thought the key to the look of the photos.

The note on the stand is easily explained. The distance from my subject was the maximum available for this shot ... in specialcific my back to the wall. I do not know how you usually do portraits @ Moth, but being tied to a tripod and no longer able to look through the viewfinder .. In addition, even with the absurd enough space, having the machine "bound" would not allow me to move, change shots quickly and interact with the subject (which is not a mannequin) preventing me to grasp the expression that is my purpose prince.

This is not meant to be a justification for the photo, but the explanation of why actually is not technically accurate.

Not having control of light you're absolutely right you ... My contribution was to try to "limit" the coefficient of uncertainty as much as possible. The shadow of the nose is outlined, but perfectly readable, cos & isevere as the brightest points ... so do not call it "hard".

If we really most of the comments were beyond the limit set dell'apprezzabile (and publishable) I definitely see my tolerance parameters.

Alberto

avatarjunior
sent on February 04, 2013 (18:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I understand you've been very clear :) thanks! :)




Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me