What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 01, 2020 (8:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great :-o!!
Hello Manlio. Ottimo  !!
Ciao Manlio. |
| sent on April 01, 2020 (9:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Manlio: I am also amazed at this magical quality that gives this goal. I took it for more to realize why most owners of this lens produce blurry photos. Also on flikr there are groups dedicated to this goal but I did not find a photographer who had posted quqlitably acceptable photos. Probably the production of the first specimens was defective, or it was a matter of calibration , in short, I could not understand. Hello Grazie Manlio: sono esterrefatto anch'io per questa qualità magica che dona questo obiettivo.L'ho preso per altro per rendermi conto del perchè la maggior parte dei possessori di questa lente produce foto sfocate. Anche su flikr ci sono dei gruppi dedicati a questo obiettivo ma non ho trovato un fotografo che avesse postato foto quqlitativamente accettabili. Probabilmente la produzione dei primi esemplari era difettosa, oppure era questione di tarature ,insomma, non sono riuscito a capire. Ciao |
| sent on April 01, 2020 (9:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Really nice and well detailed. I also use the same lens, but of the first series. Let's say it's not an easy target to use, but if used well it has a very good yield up to 15 meters. I always use it from 450 to 500 mm of focal, and I never go below f/9, since after that it already loses slightly. Congratulations. Davvero bella e ben dettagliata. Uso anche io lo stesso obiettivo, ma della prima serie. Diciamo che non é un obiettivo facile da usare, ma se usato bene ha una resa buonissima fino a 15 metri. Io lo uso sempre dai 450 ai 500 mm di focale, e non scendo mai sotto f/9, dato che dopo perde già leggermente. Complimenti. |
| sent on April 01, 2020 (10:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much Gems. Mha! I remain doubtful about the differences in yield at various distances because I have seen landscape photos with an amazing definition and also the fact that from 500 to 600 does not make good for the first tests does not show me. Maybe everything open Drops the surrender but I still have to try it bn. The only negative note for now is the chromatic aberration that in some cases of shooting comes out. Grazie mille Gemme. Mha! Resto dubbiosi sulle differenze di resa alle varie distanze perché ho visto foto di paesaggio dalla definizione strepitosa e anche del fatto che da 500 a 600 non renda bene per le prime prove non mi risulta. Forse tutto aperto Cala la resa ma devo ancora provarlo bn. Unica nota negativa per ora e' l'aberrazione cromatica che in certi casi di ripresa viene fuori. |
| sent on April 01, 2020 (10:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Of course I was talking about yield on birds, where the criterion is slightly different. On the landscape there are no restrictions. I have had a lot of experience with this goal, I have been using it exactly for 5 years. It has its limits... but knowing him well can get around. Ovviamente parlavo della resa sugli uccelli, dove il criterio é leggermente diverso. Sulla paesaggistica non ci sono restrizioni. Io ho fatto molta esperienza con questo obiettivo, lo uso esattamente da 5 anni. Ha i suoi limiti... ma conoscendolo bene si possono aggirare. |
| sent on April 01, 2020 (11:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You are completely right about the difference in criteria on the definition of the plumage of birds and I will tell you that at medium distances I see that it has difficulty in recording details also ends my 300 2.8 with and without dupli. Hello Hai pienamente ragione sulla differenza di criterio sulla definizione del piumaggio degli uccelli e ti dirò che alle medie distanze vedo che ha difficoltà nella registrazione dei dettagli fini anche il mio 300 2,8 con e senza dupli. Ciao |
| sent on April 01, 2020 (13:08) | This comment has been translated
Great shot! |
| sent on April 01, 2020 (15:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Stef Grazie Stef |
| sent on April 17, 2020 (9:56)
Magnificent photo. Beautiful colors. Nice details, beautiful background and composition.
Regards,
Satish. |
| sent on April 17, 2020 (10:45) | This comment has been translated
Wonderful, congrats! |
| sent on April 17, 2020 (11:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great, congratulations.
Hello, Rosario Stupendo, complimenti.
Ciao, Rosario |
| sent on April 17, 2020 (12:00) | This comment has been translated
Super! |
| sent on April 17, 2020 (13:55) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful portrait! |
| sent on April 17, 2020 (18:57) | This comment has been translated
Marvelous, congrats |
| sent on April 18, 2020 (7:43)
Beautiful, congratulations! For colors and elegance of the subject, skillfully caught in excellent posture. A Greetings Pawel |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
